Preliminary assessment of augmentative and alternative communication‐related stereotypy

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behavioral Interventions Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1002/bin.2042
Natalie R. Andzik, Stephen F. Walker, Cassandra A. O’Hara, Samantha A. Camacho, Lacey Landmeier, Mary Brander
{"title":"Preliminary assessment of augmentative and alternative communication‐related stereotypy","authors":"Natalie R. Andzik, Stephen F. Walker, Cassandra A. O’Hara, Samantha A. Camacho, Lacey Landmeier, Mary Brander","doi":"10.1002/bin.2042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improving social communication and reducing challenging forms of restricted and repetitive behaviors (i.e., stereotypy) are often the focus of behavioral interventions for individuals with autism and other developmental disabilities. Interventions incorporating augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems are utilized to improve independent communication. However, using electronic AAC devices (e.g., iPads) may increase stereotypic behaviors (i.e., pressing the same icon on an AAC device two or more times within 2 s), which may impact the development and maintenance of communication skills. There is a shortage of research focusing on AAC‐related stereotypy, with only one study that includes a systematic assessment and treatment evaluation (Cook et al., 2017). The purpose of the current investigation was to conduct a functional analysis screening procedure that only included play and no‐interaction conditions to adequately assess the function of AAC‐related stereotypy. We sought to ask, how client‐specific modifications to functional assessment procedures affect the outcomes of functional assessments of AAC‐related stereotypy. Initial findings suggest that AAC‐related stereotypy is often automatically reinforced, but its occurrence can be sensitive to the presence/absence of specific environmental stimuli.","PeriodicalId":47138,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Interventions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.2042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improving social communication and reducing challenging forms of restricted and repetitive behaviors (i.e., stereotypy) are often the focus of behavioral interventions for individuals with autism and other developmental disabilities. Interventions incorporating augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems are utilized to improve independent communication. However, using electronic AAC devices (e.g., iPads) may increase stereotypic behaviors (i.e., pressing the same icon on an AAC device two or more times within 2 s), which may impact the development and maintenance of communication skills. There is a shortage of research focusing on AAC‐related stereotypy, with only one study that includes a systematic assessment and treatment evaluation (Cook et al., 2017). The purpose of the current investigation was to conduct a functional analysis screening procedure that only included play and no‐interaction conditions to adequately assess the function of AAC‐related stereotypy. We sought to ask, how client‐specific modifications to functional assessment procedures affect the outcomes of functional assessments of AAC‐related stereotypy. Initial findings suggest that AAC‐related stereotypy is often automatically reinforced, but its occurrence can be sensitive to the presence/absence of specific environmental stimuli.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对与辅助和替代性交流有关的刻板印象的初步评估
改善社交沟通、减少具有挑战性的限制和重复行为(即刻板行为)通常是自闭症和其他发育障碍患者行为干预的重点。采用辅助和替代性交流(AAC)系统进行干预,可以提高独立交流的能力。然而,使用电子辅助和替代性交流设备(如 iPad)可能会增加刻板行为(即在 2 秒钟内按压辅助和替代性交流设备上的同一图标两次或两次以上),这可能会影响交流技能的发展和维持。目前关注与 AAC 相关的刻板行为的研究还很缺乏,只有一项研究包含了系统评估和治疗评价(Cook 等人,2017 年)。当前调查的目的是进行功能分析筛选程序,只包括游戏和无互动条件,以充分评估与 AAC 相关的刻板行为的功能。我们试图探究,针对特定客户对功能评估程序的修改会如何影响与 AAC 相关的刻板行为的功能评估结果。初步研究结果表明,与自动言语交流相关的刻板行为通常会自动得到强化,但其发生可能对特定环境刺激的存在/不存在很敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral Interventions PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Behavioral Interventions aims to report research and practice involving the utilization of behavioral techniques in the treatment, education, assessment and training of students, clients or patients, as well as training techniques used with staff. Behavioral Interventions publishes: (1) research articles, (2) brief reports (a short report of an innovative technique or intervention that may be less rigorous than a research report), (3) topical literature reviews and discussion articles, (4) book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating video feedback to improve eSports performance in Street Fighter V Discrepancies between treatment preference and effectiveness Effects of an online group‐based intervention on effort tolerance in general education Further analysis of fixed‐lean approaches to reinforcement schedule thinning Token economies: Evidence‐based recommendations for practitioners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1