COVID-19 impact on food consumption of low-skilled employees in India

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1016/j.gfs.2024.100791
Bita Afsharinia , Anjula Gurtoo
{"title":"COVID-19 impact on food consumption of low-skilled employees in India","authors":"Bita Afsharinia ,&nbsp;Anjula Gurtoo","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2024.100791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic adversely affected several aspects of daily life including economic, social, interpersonal, food and health. In India, low skilled employees experienced significantly higher levels of adversity including income loss and food security risks. This study investigates the relationship between pandemic led economic changes and food consumption among low-skilled employees, mediated by pandemic specific variables like government support and emotional distress. We argue and contend current literature provides a simple linear analysis between pandemic impacted economic status and food consumption. Several other significant variables in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic play a significant mediating role in the relationship.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A longitudinal survey of 2830 low skill (unskilled and semi-skilled) employees during two time periods of July–November 2019 and December–January 2020-21 was conducted. The survey respondents included drivers, domestic workers, delivery personnels, beauticians, street vendors, small business owners, and self-employed individuals. Face-to-face interviews collected data on the variables under the UN Security Framework (2016) including economic, food, health, environment, personal, community, and political security. Paired t-tests analyzed the changes in economic status, Wilcoxon's signed rank test compared the food consumption scores (FCS), and Structural equation models (SEM) explored the direct and indirect impacts of the pandemic on food consumption.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The lockdown significantly reduced monthly earnings compared to pre-lockdown levels (p &lt; 00.001). FCS shifted towards borderline, indicating decreased dairy intake. SEM revealed indirect effects of economic status on food consumption through increased emotional distress, and insufficiency of government support for economic status and food consumption during the pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Tailored government programs are essential in addressing food insecurity among low employees. Priority should be given in addressing emotional distress during crises and reevaluate the role of government interventions on their effectiveness and reach. Reevaluating program fairness and increasing support for low-income employees are crucial steps in mitigating food insecurity risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48741,"journal":{"name":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100791"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912424000531","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic adversely affected several aspects of daily life including economic, social, interpersonal, food and health. In India, low skilled employees experienced significantly higher levels of adversity including income loss and food security risks. This study investigates the relationship between pandemic led economic changes and food consumption among low-skilled employees, mediated by pandemic specific variables like government support and emotional distress. We argue and contend current literature provides a simple linear analysis between pandemic impacted economic status and food consumption. Several other significant variables in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic play a significant mediating role in the relationship.

Methods

A longitudinal survey of 2830 low skill (unskilled and semi-skilled) employees during two time periods of July–November 2019 and December–January 2020-21 was conducted. The survey respondents included drivers, domestic workers, delivery personnels, beauticians, street vendors, small business owners, and self-employed individuals. Face-to-face interviews collected data on the variables under the UN Security Framework (2016) including economic, food, health, environment, personal, community, and political security. Paired t-tests analyzed the changes in economic status, Wilcoxon's signed rank test compared the food consumption scores (FCS), and Structural equation models (SEM) explored the direct and indirect impacts of the pandemic on food consumption.

Results

The lockdown significantly reduced monthly earnings compared to pre-lockdown levels (p < 00.001). FCS shifted towards borderline, indicating decreased dairy intake. SEM revealed indirect effects of economic status on food consumption through increased emotional distress, and insufficiency of government support for economic status and food consumption during the pandemic.

Conclusion

Tailored government programs are essential in addressing food insecurity among low employees. Priority should be given in addressing emotional distress during crises and reevaluate the role of government interventions on their effectiveness and reach. Reevaluating program fairness and increasing support for low-income employees are crucial steps in mitigating food insecurity risks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 对印度低技能雇员食品消费的影响
COVID-19 大流行对日常生活的多个方面造成了不利影响,包括经济、社会、人际、食品和健康。在印度,低技能雇员经历的逆境程度明显更高,包括收入损失和食品安全风险。本研究调查了大流行导致的经济变化与低技能员工的食品消费之间的关系,以及大流行病特定变量(如政府支持和情绪困扰)的中介作用。我们认为,目前的文献对大流行病影响下的经济状况与食品消费之间进行了简单的线性分析。在 COVID-19 大流行的背景下,其他几个重要变量在这一关系中发挥了重要的中介作用。在 2019 年 7 月至 11 月和 2020 年 12 月至 21 年 1 月两个时间段内,对 2830 名低技能(非熟练和半熟练)雇员进行了纵向调查。调查对象包括司机、家政工人、送货员、美容师、街头小贩、小企业主和个体经营者。面对面访谈收集了联合国安全框架(2016 年)下的变量数据,包括经济、食品、健康、环境、个人、社区和政治安全。配对 t 检验分析了经济状况的变化,Wilcoxon 签名等级检验比较了食品消费得分(FCS),结构方程模型(SEM)探讨了大流行病对食品消费的直接和间接影响。与封锁前相比,封锁大大降低了月收入(p < 00.001)。FCS 转向边界线,表明乳制品摄入量减少。SEM 显示,经济状况对食物消费的间接影响包括情绪困扰的增加,以及大流行病期间政府对经济状况和食物消费的支持不足。有针对性的政府计划对于解决低收入人群的食物不安全问题至关重要。应优先解决危机期间的情绪困扰问题,并重新评估政府干预措施的有效性和覆盖范围。重新评估计划的公平性并增加对低收入员工的支持是降低粮食不安全风险的关键步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Global Food Security plays a vital role in addressing food security challenges from local to global levels. To secure food systems, it emphasizes multifaceted actions considering technological, biophysical, institutional, economic, social, and political factors. The goal is to foster food systems that meet nutritional needs, preserve the environment, support livelihoods, tackle climate change, and diminish inequalities. This journal serves as a platform for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to access and engage with recent, diverse research and perspectives on achieving sustainable food security globally. It aspires to be an internationally recognized resource presenting cutting-edge insights in an accessible manner to a broad audience.
期刊最新文献
Revealing the power of green leafy vegetables: Cultivating diversity for health, environmental benefits, and sustainability Do diverse crops or diverse market purchases matter more for women's diet quality in farm households of Mali? How to monitor the ‘success’ of agricultural sustainability: A perspective Defining and measuring policy coherence for food system transformation: A scoping review Resilient and inclusive rural transformation in sub-Saharan Africa under climate, demographic, and social change: Challenges and opportunities for income growth and job creation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1