Estimating global article processing charges paid to six publishers for open access between 2019 and 2023

Stefanie Haustein, Eric Schares, Juan Pablo Alperin, Madelaine Hare, Leigh-Ann Butler, Nina Schönfelder
{"title":"Estimating global article processing charges paid to six publishers for open access between 2019 and 2023","authors":"Stefanie Haustein, Eric Schares, Juan Pablo Alperin, Madelaine Hare, Leigh-Ann Butler, Nina Schönfelder","doi":"arxiv-2407.16551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents estimates of the global expenditure on article processing\ncharges (APCs) paid to six publishers for open access between 2019 and 2023.\nAPCs are fees charged for publishing in some fully open access journals (gold)\nand in subscription journals to make individual articles open access (hybrid).\nThere is currently no way to systematically track institutional, national or\nglobal expenses for open access publishing due to a lack of transparency in APC\nprices, what articles they are paid for, or who pays them. We therefore curated\nand used an open dataset of annual APC list prices from Elsevier, Frontiers,\nMDPI, PLOS, Springer Nature, and Wiley in combination with the number of open\naccess articles from these publishers indexed by OpenAlex to estimate that,\nglobally, a total of \\$8.349 billion (\\$8.968 billion in 2023 US dollars) were\nspent on APCs between 2019 and 2023. We estimate that in 2023 MDPI (\\$681.6\nmillion), Elsevier (\\$582.8 million) and Springer Nature (\\$546.6) generated\nthe most revenue with APCs. After adjusting for inflation, we also show that\nannual spending almost tripled from \\$910.3 million in 2019 to \\$2.538 billion\nin 2023, that hybrid exceed gold fees, and that the median APCs paid are higher\nthan the median listed fees for both gold and hybrid. Our approach addresses\nmajor limitations in previous efforts to estimate APCs paid and offers much\nneeded insight into an otherwise opaque aspect of the business of scholarly\npublishing. We call upon publishers to be more transparent about OA fees.","PeriodicalId":501285,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.16551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents estimates of the global expenditure on article processing charges (APCs) paid to six publishers for open access between 2019 and 2023. APCs are fees charged for publishing in some fully open access journals (gold) and in subscription journals to make individual articles open access (hybrid). There is currently no way to systematically track institutional, national or global expenses for open access publishing due to a lack of transparency in APC prices, what articles they are paid for, or who pays them. We therefore curated and used an open dataset of annual APC list prices from Elsevier, Frontiers, MDPI, PLOS, Springer Nature, and Wiley in combination with the number of open access articles from these publishers indexed by OpenAlex to estimate that, globally, a total of \$8.349 billion (\$8.968 billion in 2023 US dollars) were spent on APCs between 2019 and 2023. We estimate that in 2023 MDPI (\$681.6 million), Elsevier (\$582.8 million) and Springer Nature (\$546.6) generated the most revenue with APCs. After adjusting for inflation, we also show that annual spending almost tripled from \$910.3 million in 2019 to \$2.538 billion in 2023, that hybrid exceed gold fees, and that the median APCs paid are higher than the median listed fees for both gold and hybrid. Our approach addresses major limitations in previous efforts to estimate APCs paid and offers much needed insight into an otherwise opaque aspect of the business of scholarly publishing. We call upon publishers to be more transparent about OA fees.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估算 2019 年至 2023 年向六家出版商支付的全球开放存取文章处理费
本研究估算了2019年至2023年间全球支付给六家出版商的开放存取文章处理费(APC)的支出。APC是在一些完全开放存取期刊(黄金期刊)上发表文章以及在订阅期刊上发表单篇文章以实现开放存取(混合期刊)所收取的费用。由于APC价格缺乏透明度,哪些文章需要支付APC,或由谁支付APC,目前还没有办法系统地跟踪机构、国家或全球在开放存取出版方面的支出。因此,我们整理并使用了爱思唯尔、Frontiers、MDPI、PLOS、施普林格-自然(Springer Nature)和威利(Wiley)的年度APC清单价格公开数据集,结合OpenAlex索引的这些出版商的开放获取文章数量,估算出2019年至2023年全球在APC上的支出总额为83.49亿美元(按2023年美元计算为89.68亿美元)。我们估计,2023 年,MDPI(6.816 亿美元)、Elsevier(5.828 亿美元)和 Springer Nature(5.466 亿美元)的 APCs 收入最多。在对通货膨胀进行调整后,我们还表明,每年的支出几乎增加了两倍,从 2019 年的(9.103 亿美元)增加到 2023 年的(25.38 亿美元),混合收费超过了黄金收费,而且支付的 APC 中位数高于黄金收费和混合收费的上市收费中位数。我们的方法解决了以往估算 APC 费用的主要局限性,并为学术出版业务的不透明方面提供了亟需的洞察力。我们呼吁出版商提高 OA 收费的透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Publishing Instincts: An Exploration-Exploitation Framework for Studying Academic Publishing Behavior and "Home Venues" Research Citations Building Trust in Wikipedia Evaluating the Linguistic Coverage of OpenAlex: An Assessment of Metadata Accuracy and Completeness Towards understanding evolution of science through language model series Ensuring Adherence to Standards in Experiment-Related Metadata Entered Via Spreadsheets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1