Imaginaries and Normativities. Experimental Impulses for Digital and Public Theologies

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION Open Theology Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1515/opth-2024-0010
Florian Höhne
{"title":"Imaginaries and Normativities. Experimental Impulses for Digital and Public Theologies","authors":"Florian Höhne","doi":"10.1515/opth-2024-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article explores how Digital and Public Theologies, two separate but overlapping discourses, can combine empirical and normative efforts. The article highlights the role that the sensitivity for context should play in the development of each of these theologies. To better understand the role of the context, the category of the imaginary is outlined with reference to Charles Taylor and Cornelius Castoriadis. This category helps to describe and criticize imaginaries that determine the social, psychological, political, and contextual realities which theology reflects on – this will be called the reflective or critical task of theology. The category also helps to describe and criticize the imaginaries that determine theological thinking itself, the perspective of a given theology as well as the orientations it suggests. This is the self-critical task of theology. Furthermore, I will suggest to see it as a constant and remaining task of theology to make its imaginations explicit and open to critique because these imaginations are the source of orientations that theology articulates. This calls for theologies that understand themselves as dynamic, unfinished, and discursive.","PeriodicalId":42436,"journal":{"name":"Open Theology","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2024-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article explores how Digital and Public Theologies, two separate but overlapping discourses, can combine empirical and normative efforts. The article highlights the role that the sensitivity for context should play in the development of each of these theologies. To better understand the role of the context, the category of the imaginary is outlined with reference to Charles Taylor and Cornelius Castoriadis. This category helps to describe and criticize imaginaries that determine the social, psychological, political, and contextual realities which theology reflects on – this will be called the reflective or critical task of theology. The category also helps to describe and criticize the imaginaries that determine theological thinking itself, the perspective of a given theology as well as the orientations it suggests. This is the self-critical task of theology. Furthermore, I will suggest to see it as a constant and remaining task of theology to make its imaginations explicit and open to critique because these imaginations are the source of orientations that theology articulates. This calls for theologies that understand themselves as dynamic, unfinished, and discursive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
想象与规范。数字与公共神学的实验动力
文章探讨了数字神学和公共神学这两种相互独立但又相互重叠的论述如何将经验性和规范性工作结合起来。文章强调了对语境的敏感性在这两种神学的发展中所应发挥的作用。为了更好地理解语境的作用,文章参考了查尔斯-泰勒和科尼利厄斯-卡斯托里亚迪斯的观点,概述了想象的范畴。这一范畴有助于描述和批判决定神学所反思的社会、心理、政治和语境现实的想象--这将被称为神学的反思或批判任务。这一类别还有助于描述和批判决定神学思维本身的想象力、特定神学的视角及其建议的取向。这就是神学的自我批判任务。此外,我将建议把明确其想象并接受批判视为神学的一项持续的任务,因为这些想象是神学所阐明的取向的源泉。这就要求神学将自身理解为动态的、未完成的和辨证的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Theology
Open Theology RELIGION-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Theology is an international Open Access, peer-reviewed academic journal that welcomes contributions written in English addressing religion in its various forms and aspects: historical, theological, sociological, psychological, and other. The journal encompasses all major disciplines of Theology and Religious Studies, presenting doctrine, history, organization and everyday life of various types of religious groups and the relations between them. We publish articles from the field of Theology as well as Philosophy, Sociology and Psychology of Religion and also dialogue between Religion and Science. The Open Theology does not present views of any particular theological school nor of a particular religious organization. The contributions are written by researchers who represent different religious views. The authors present their research concerning the old religious traditions as well as new religious movements. The aim of the journal is to promote an international and interdisciplinary dialogue in the field of Theology and Religious Studies. The journal seeks also to provide researchers, pastors and other interested persons with the fruits of academic studies.
期刊最新文献
“Teachers of Good Things”: Origen on Women as Teachers Constructive After Systematic? On Doing Theology in South Africa Today Blood Lines: Biopolitics, Patriarchy, Myth A Militant Bride: Gender-Loaded Metaphors in Jerome’s Writings to Ascetic Men and Women “The Remedy for a World Without Transcendence”: Georges Bataille on Sacrifice and the Theology of Transgression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1