Efficacy and safety of sarilumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis stratified by age (<65 and ≥65 years): A post hoc analysis of Japanese Phase 3 clinical trials.
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of sarilumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis stratified by age (<65 and ≥65 years): A post hoc analysis of Japanese Phase 3 clinical trials.","authors":"Yoshiya Tanaka, Toshiya Takahashi, Hubert van Hoogstraten, Naoto Kato, Hideto Kameda","doi":"10.1093/mr/roae057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of sarilumab in older patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a post hoc analysis of KAKEHASI (NCT02293902) and HARUKA (NCT02373202) trials with stratification by age (<65 and ≥65 years). Patients with moderately to severely active RA were treated with sarilumab in combination with methotrexate or with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or as monotherapy. The primary end points in KAKEHASI and HARUKA trials were the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) responses at Week 24 and safety, respectively. Secondary end points were other RA disease activity measures, including Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 20% of patients were aged ≥65 years in treatment arms across both trials, except the sarilumab + csDMARD arm (40%, 12/30). ACR20 response rates were similar between age groups across sarilumab treatment arms, and similar results were obtained for the CDAI scores. Safety profiles were similar between age groups except for a higher incidence of serious adverse events in patients aged ≥65 years in the sarilumab + methotrexate arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Japanese patients with RA enrolled in Phase 3 studies for sarilumab, no clear difference in efficacy or safety was observed between patients aged <65 and ≥65 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":18705,"journal":{"name":"Modern Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"34-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roae057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of sarilumab in older patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of KAKEHASI (NCT02293902) and HARUKA (NCT02373202) trials with stratification by age (<65 and ≥65 years). Patients with moderately to severely active RA were treated with sarilumab in combination with methotrexate or with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or as monotherapy. The primary end points in KAKEHASI and HARUKA trials were the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) responses at Week 24 and safety, respectively. Secondary end points were other RA disease activity measures, including Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI).
Results: Approximately 20% of patients were aged ≥65 years in treatment arms across both trials, except the sarilumab + csDMARD arm (40%, 12/30). ACR20 response rates were similar between age groups across sarilumab treatment arms, and similar results were obtained for the CDAI scores. Safety profiles were similar between age groups except for a higher incidence of serious adverse events in patients aged ≥65 years in the sarilumab + methotrexate arm.
Conclusions: In Japanese patients with RA enrolled in Phase 3 studies for sarilumab, no clear difference in efficacy or safety was observed between patients aged <65 and ≥65 years.
期刊介绍:
Modern Rheumatology publishes original papers in English on research pertinent to rheumatology and associated areas such as pathology, physiology, clinical immunology, microbiology, biochemistry, experimental animal models, pharmacology, and orthopedic surgery.
Occasional reviews of topics which may be of wide interest to the readership will be accepted. In addition, concise papers of special scientific importance that represent definitive and original studies will be considered.
Modern Rheumatology is currently indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Google Scholar, EBSCO, CSA, Academic OneFile, Current Abstracts, Elsevier Biobase, Gale, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, SCImago, Summon by Serial Solutions