Kinematic and Kinetic Differences Between Ball Rotational Exercises and the Throwing Motion in Collegiate Baseball Athletes.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000004879
Joseph A Mylott, Emily M Potts, Jakob H Wolf, Garrett S Bullock, Kristen F Nicholson
{"title":"Kinematic and Kinetic Differences Between Ball Rotational Exercises and the Throwing Motion in Collegiate Baseball Athletes.","authors":"Joseph A Mylott, Emily M Potts, Jakob H Wolf, Garrett S Bullock, Kristen F Nicholson","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000004879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Mylott, JA, Potts, EM, Wolf, JH, Bullock, GS, and Nicholson, KF. Kinematic and kinetic differences between ball rotational exercises and the throwing motion in collegiate baseball athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-The purpose of this study was to observe the associations that medicine ball pushes and chops have on the lower extremities regarding ground reaction forces (GRF) and lead knee flexion angles and to compare these values with a regular baseball overhead throw. Lower extremity kinetics and kinematics were obtained via force plates and marker motion capture. Subjects (n = 35) included baseball players (age 19.7 ± 1.5 years). Five medicine ball movements of each type along with at least 3 pitches or 5 throws off the mound were recorded for data collection. Statistical parametric mapping, including analysis of variance and 2-way t-tests, was used to compare the variables of interest between the movements for continuous time data. All kinematic and kinetic variables were significantly different (p < 0.05) for some time during the motion between the different trial types of medicine ball exercises and throws. A medicine ball chop can increase peak drive leg GRF, whereas a push can help an athlete keep greater driver leg GRF and maintain ground connection into foot plant. A push helps train lead leg deficiencies in the delivery. Both the medicine ball chop and push have benefits for training lead leg stabilization and extension.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004879","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Mylott, JA, Potts, EM, Wolf, JH, Bullock, GS, and Nicholson, KF. Kinematic and kinetic differences between ball rotational exercises and the throwing motion in collegiate baseball athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-The purpose of this study was to observe the associations that medicine ball pushes and chops have on the lower extremities regarding ground reaction forces (GRF) and lead knee flexion angles and to compare these values with a regular baseball overhead throw. Lower extremity kinetics and kinematics were obtained via force plates and marker motion capture. Subjects (n = 35) included baseball players (age 19.7 ± 1.5 years). Five medicine ball movements of each type along with at least 3 pitches or 5 throws off the mound were recorded for data collection. Statistical parametric mapping, including analysis of variance and 2-way t-tests, was used to compare the variables of interest between the movements for continuous time data. All kinematic and kinetic variables were significantly different (p < 0.05) for some time during the motion between the different trial types of medicine ball exercises and throws. A medicine ball chop can increase peak drive leg GRF, whereas a push can help an athlete keep greater driver leg GRF and maintain ground connection into foot plant. A push helps train lead leg deficiencies in the delivery. Both the medicine ball chop and push have benefits for training lead leg stabilization and extension.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学棒球运动员旋转球练习与投掷动作之间的运动学和动力学差异。
摘要:Mylott、JA、Potts、EM、Wolf、JH、Bullock、GS 和 Nicholson、KF。大学棒球运动员在球旋转练习和投掷动作之间的运动学和动力学差异。J Strength Cond Res XX(X):000-000,2024-本研究的目的是观察药球推和劈对下肢地面反作用力(GRF)和膝关节前屈角度的影响,并将这些值与常规棒球高空投掷进行比较。通过力板和标记运动捕捉获得下肢动力学和运动学数据。受试者(n = 35)包括棒球运动员(年龄 19.7 ± 1.5 岁)。每种类型的五次药球运动以及至少 3 次投球或 5 次从投手丘上抛球都被记录下来以收集数据。统计参数映射(包括方差分析和双向 t 检验)用于比较连续时间数据中各动作之间的相关变量。在药球练习和投掷的不同试验类型之间,所有运动学和动力学变量在运动过程中的某些时间段都存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。劈药球可以增加驱动腿GRF峰值,而推举则可以帮助运动员保持更大的驱动腿GRF,并在脚掌着地时保持地面连接。推球有助于训练投掷过程中驱动腿的缺陷。药球劈腿和推举对训练前导腿的稳定和伸展都有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
期刊最新文献
Does Cathodal Preconditioning Enhance the Effects of Subsequent Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability and Grip Strength? Evaluation of Trunk Oblique Muscle Activities in Baseball Batters Using T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Frequency of Velocity-Based-Training Frequency Impacts Changes in Muscle Morphology, Neuromuscular Performance, and Functional Capability in Persons With Parkinson's Disease. Position-Specific Differences in Speed Profiles Among National Football League Scouting Combine Participants. Prediction of Snatch and Clean and Jerk Performance From Physical Performance Measures in Elite Male Weightlifters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1