Advance directives in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1186/s12904-024-01524-1
Anne Lisa Mangal, Martin Mücke, Roman Rolke, Iris Appelmann
{"title":"Advance directives in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Anne Lisa Mangal, Martin Mücke, Roman Rolke, Iris Appelmann","doi":"10.1186/s12904-024-01524-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease of the upper and lower motoneuron. It is associated with a life expectancy of 2-4 years after diagnosis. Individuals experience paralysis, dysphagia, respiratory failure and loss of communicative function, rendering advance care planning (ACP) critically important. This systematic review primarily aimed to internationally compare the application of advance directives (AD) and ACP in ALS. Its secondary aim was to identify ACP preferences, identify fields for future research and to generate recommendations for improving patient care through ACP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Five electronic databases (Embase, Medline, Scopus, PsycInfo and CENTRAL) were searched for qualitative and quantitative primary literature from 1999 to 2024. Cross-references were used to identify additional publications. Study selection was performed based on inclusion criteria. Number and content of AD were extracted systematically. After statistical analysis consecutive meta-analysis was performed for international differences and changes over time. Quality assessment of studies was performed using the MMAT (Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool). PROSPERO Registration (June 07, 2021) : CRD42021248040.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 998 records was screened of which 26 were included in the synthesis. An increase in publication numbers of 88.9% was observed from 1999 to 2024. Results regarding use and content of AD were heterogeneous and international differences were detected. AD were signed in 60.4% of records (1,629 / 2,696 patients). The number of AD decreased over time when separating the review period in two decades (1st 1999-2011: 78% vs. 2nd 2012-2024: 42%). Study quality was superior in qualitative and mixed method designs compared to quantitative studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further prospective studies should include detailed analyses on preferences regarding ventilation and artificial nutrition in ALS and should encompass countries of the global south. Despite the complexity of ACP with regard to individual patient needs, ACP should be part of each individual support plan for ALS patients and should specifically comprise a discussion on the preferred place of death. The available disease-specific AD documents should be preferred.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"23 1","pages":"191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11285133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01524-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease of the upper and lower motoneuron. It is associated with a life expectancy of 2-4 years after diagnosis. Individuals experience paralysis, dysphagia, respiratory failure and loss of communicative function, rendering advance care planning (ACP) critically important. This systematic review primarily aimed to internationally compare the application of advance directives (AD) and ACP in ALS. Its secondary aim was to identify ACP preferences, identify fields for future research and to generate recommendations for improving patient care through ACP.

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Five electronic databases (Embase, Medline, Scopus, PsycInfo and CENTRAL) were searched for qualitative and quantitative primary literature from 1999 to 2024. Cross-references were used to identify additional publications. Study selection was performed based on inclusion criteria. Number and content of AD were extracted systematically. After statistical analysis consecutive meta-analysis was performed for international differences and changes over time. Quality assessment of studies was performed using the MMAT (Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool). PROSPERO Registration (June 07, 2021) : CRD42021248040.

Results: A total of 998 records was screened of which 26 were included in the synthesis. An increase in publication numbers of 88.9% was observed from 1999 to 2024. Results regarding use and content of AD were heterogeneous and international differences were detected. AD were signed in 60.4% of records (1,629 / 2,696 patients). The number of AD decreased over time when separating the review period in two decades (1st 1999-2011: 78% vs. 2nd 2012-2024: 42%). Study quality was superior in qualitative and mixed method designs compared to quantitative studies.

Conclusion: Further prospective studies should include detailed analyses on preferences regarding ventilation and artificial nutrition in ALS and should encompass countries of the global south. Despite the complexity of ACP with regard to individual patient needs, ACP should be part of each individual support plan for ALS patients and should specifically comprise a discussion on the preferred place of death. The available disease-specific AD documents should be preferred.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肌萎缩侧索硬化症的预嘱--系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症(ALS)是一种上下运动神经元的神经退行性疾病。确诊后患者的预期寿命为 2-4 年。患者会出现瘫痪、吞咽困难、呼吸衰竭和丧失交流功能等症状,因此预先护理计划(ACP)至关重要。本系统综述的主要目的是在国际范围内比较预先医疗指示 (AD) 和预先医疗计划在 ALS 中的应用。其次是确定 ACP 偏好,确定未来研究领域,并提出通过 ACP 改善患者护理的建议:我们进行了系统的文献综述和荟萃分析。我们在五个电子数据库(Embase、Medline、Scopus、PsycInfo 和 CENTRAL)中检索了 1999 年至 2024 年期间的定性和定量主要文献。交叉引用用于识别其他出版物。根据纳入标准对研究进行筛选。系统地提取了 AD 的数量和内容。经过统计分析后,对国际差异和随时间推移的变化进行了连续的荟萃分析。研究质量评估采用 MMAT(混合方法评估工具)进行。PROSPERO注册(2021年6月7日):CRD42021248040.结果:结果:共筛选出998条记录,其中26条被纳入综述。从 1999 年到 2024 年,发表论文的数量增加了 88.9%。关于AD的使用和内容的研究结果各不相同,并发现了国际差异。60.4%的记录(1629/2696 名患者)签署了 AD。将审查期分为两个十年,随着时间的推移,AD的数量有所减少(1999-2011年第一阶段:78%;2012-2024年第二阶段:42%)。与定量研究相比,定性和混合方法设计的研究质量更高:进一步的前瞻性研究应包括对 ALS 通气和人工营养偏好的详细分析,并应涵盖全球南部国家。尽管 ACP 与患者的个体需求有关,具有一定的复杂性,但 ACP 应成为 ALS 患者个体支持计划的一部分,并应特别包括对首选死亡地点的讨论。应首选现有的针对特定疾病的 AD 文件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
期刊最新文献
Communication about incurable illness and remaining life between spouses and patients with incurable illness receiving specialized home care: effects of a family caregiver-targeted web-based psycho-educational intervention. Correction: Adapting the serious illness conversation guide for unhoused older adults: a rapid qualitative study. Online education in palliative care - A national exploratory multimethod study. The family talk intervention prevent the feeling of loneliness - a long term follow up after a parents life-threatening illness. Is the use of antibiotic stewardship measures in the context of specialized outpatient palliative care sensible and feasible? An interview-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1