Affluence and the Demand-side for Policy Improvements: Exploring Elite Beliefs About Vulnerability to Societal Problems

The Forum Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1515/for-2024-2007
Alan S. Gerber, Mackenzie Lockhart, E. Patashnik
{"title":"Affluence and the Demand-side for Policy Improvements: Exploring Elite Beliefs About Vulnerability to Societal Problems","authors":"Alan S. Gerber, Mackenzie Lockhart, E. Patashnik","doi":"10.1515/for-2024-2007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n An important stylized fact about American government is that many societal problems persist despite expert recognition that better outcomes are technically feasible. What explains the weakness of the political demand for more effective public policies? This study investigates one factor that may contribute to the attenuated demand for policy improvements: namely, the belief among many affluent citizens that they are personally insulated from societal problems. Drawing on a national public opinion survey, we show that affluent Americans believe their resources and ability to activate powerful social networks affords them a measure of personal insulation from key problems in areas such as education, healthcare and neighborhood safety. We also find that the affluent express a more optimistic view than other respondents of the average citizen’s financial situation and capacity to manage problems in several domains. Taken together, our results have important implications for understanding how highly influential Americans think about public policy in an era of inequality.","PeriodicalId":513080,"journal":{"name":"The Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2024-2007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An important stylized fact about American government is that many societal problems persist despite expert recognition that better outcomes are technically feasible. What explains the weakness of the political demand for more effective public policies? This study investigates one factor that may contribute to the attenuated demand for policy improvements: namely, the belief among many affluent citizens that they are personally insulated from societal problems. Drawing on a national public opinion survey, we show that affluent Americans believe their resources and ability to activate powerful social networks affords them a measure of personal insulation from key problems in areas such as education, healthcare and neighborhood safety. We also find that the affluent express a more optimistic view than other respondents of the average citizen’s financial situation and capacity to manage problems in several domains. Taken together, our results have important implications for understanding how highly influential Americans think about public policy in an era of inequality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
富裕与政策改进的需求方:探索精英对社会问题脆弱性的看法
美国政府的一个重要典型事实是,尽管专家们认识到改善结果在技术上是可行的,但许多社会问题依然存在。是什么原因导致对更有效的公共政策的政治需求疲软呢?本研究调查了可能导致对政策改进的需求减弱的一个因素:即许多富裕公民认为他们个人与社会问题无关。通过一项全国性的民意调查,我们发现富裕的美国人认为,他们的资源和激活强大社会网络的能力使他们在一定程度上与教育、医疗保健和邻里安全等领域的关键问题绝缘。我们还发现,与其他受访者相比,富裕阶层对普通公民的财务状况和处理多个领域问题的能力表达了更乐观的看法。综上所述,我们的研究结果对于理解在不平等时代具有高度影响力的美国人如何看待公共政策具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Ideological Diversity Moderates Republican Support for Voter Suppression Measures: The Cases of Georgia and Alabama Affluence and the Demand-side for Policy Improvements: Exploring Elite Beliefs About Vulnerability to Societal Problems Climate Change Policy Development: A Multiple Streams Analysis of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 Inside the “Administrative State”: The Enigmatic Office for Civil Rights Blame, Policy Feedback, and the Politics of Student Debt Relief Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1