Educators’ Perceptions on the Involvement of Students With Complex Support Needs in PBIS: The Role of Educational Placement

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-07-28 DOI:10.1177/15407969241263515
Alison L. Zagona, Motoaki Hara, Sheldon L. Loman, Jennifer A. Kurth, Virginia L. Walker
{"title":"Educators’ Perceptions on the Involvement of Students With Complex Support Needs in PBIS: The Role of Educational Placement","authors":"Alison L. Zagona, Motoaki Hara, Sheldon L. Loman, Jennifer A. Kurth, Virginia L. Walker","doi":"10.1177/15407969241263515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is an evidence-based practice that promotes positive academic and behavioral outcomes for all students and is intended to support the needs of all students across three tiers of support. However, research suggests students with complex support needs have limited access to Tier 1 PBIS. Teachers’ perceptions of the appropriateness of PBIS to meet the needs of students with complex support needs has been hypothesized to impact the extent to which educators provide access to Tier 1. Using data from a national survey of 644 educators, we sought to determine the extent to which educational placement of students with complex support needs impacted teacher perception of the importance of providing Tier 1 PBIS. Our results suggest educators across placements agree students with complex support needs should be involved in PBIS, including acknowledgment systems and response and data plans. Educators differed in their ideas of how to teach school-wide rules and expectations and how to document behavioral violations. We discuss implications of these findings for research and practice.","PeriodicalId":47213,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969241263515","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is an evidence-based practice that promotes positive academic and behavioral outcomes for all students and is intended to support the needs of all students across three tiers of support. However, research suggests students with complex support needs have limited access to Tier 1 PBIS. Teachers’ perceptions of the appropriateness of PBIS to meet the needs of students with complex support needs has been hypothesized to impact the extent to which educators provide access to Tier 1. Using data from a national survey of 644 educators, we sought to determine the extent to which educational placement of students with complex support needs impacted teacher perception of the importance of providing Tier 1 PBIS. Our results suggest educators across placements agree students with complex support needs should be involved in PBIS, including acknowledgment systems and response and data plans. Educators differed in their ideas of how to teach school-wide rules and expectations and how to document behavioral violations. We discuss implications of these findings for research and practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育工作者对有复杂支持需求的学生参与 PBIS 的看法:教育安置的作用
积极行为干预与支持(PBIS)是一种循证实践,旨在促进所有学生取得积极的学业和行为成果,并通过三级支持满足所有学生的需求。然而,研究表明,有复杂支持需求的学生获得第一层 PBIS 支持的机会有限。根据假设,教师对 PBIS 是否适合满足有复杂支持需求的学生的看法,会影响教育工作者提供第一层支持的程度。通过对全国 644 名教育工作者的调查数据,我们试图确定有复杂支持需求的学生的教育安置在多大程度上影响了教师对提供第一级 PBIS 的重要性的认识。我们的调查结果表明,不同教育机构的教育工作者都认为有复杂支持需求的学生应该参与到 PBIS 中,包括确认系统和响应及数据计划。在如何教授全校范围的规则和期望以及如何记录违反行为方面,教育工作者的想法各不相同。我们将讨论这些发现对研究和实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Teacher-Implemented Modified Schema-Based Instruction with Middle-Grade Students with Autism and Intellectual Disability.” A Call to Action: Extending the Research on Trauma Assessment and Treatment for Children With Intellectual Disabilities and Extensive Support Needs Experiences of Elementary Students with Complex Support Needs in Segregated Special Education Classrooms: A Mixed Methods Study Students Educated With Alternate Curriculum in Elementary School: Timing, Switching, and Educational Placements Educators’ Perceptions on the Involvement of Students With Complex Support Needs in PBIS: The Role of Educational Placement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1