Inspection as a Means of Evidence in Administrative Judiciary

Abstract

 Inspection is considered one of the most important methods of proof and direct evidence by the judiciary, because it relates to proven facts, in order to prove the truth in judicial disputes brought by the judiciary. Inspection may be carried out by the court itself, by asking one of the other litigants to inspect the disputed objects, whether they are Movable or immovable, or, if possible, by bringing it to court to do so or by changing the judge who undertakes it, it has jurisdiction over the subject of the dispute. Inspection is the most important method of proof approved by the Egyptian legislator, as it allows judges to personally inspect the subject of the dispute to ensure the validity of the other party’s claims, and it is a direct means of proof in administrative lawsuits . This study aimed to clarify the legal nature of inspection in Egyptian legislation, as well as to explain its importance, its controls, and the relationship between it and the judge’s ruling with his knowledge. The problem of