CDA Cancer Screening Strategies For Anxiety Health Checkup Cancer Screening

Anne Gracia
{"title":"CDA Cancer Screening Strategies For Anxiety Health Checkup Cancer Screening","authors":"Anne Gracia","doi":"10.59888/ajosh.v2i10.354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to find out how anxiety affects cancer detection and how early detection efforts are carried out in conjunction with screening. The mixed methods study was conducted on 1002 random subjects. In addition, qualitative research models were conducted on laboratory specialists, health examiners and oncologists on CDA screening methods. This method does not cause reports of disease, but shows that there is a good tendency to cancer. The results of the study were processed using SEM PLS analysis using SmartPLS and expert opinion analysis using Facets. The expert source's opinion (expert decision) on the transfer of detection perception to screening using the CDA method is considered feasible and constructive. Reliability is calculated by the FACETS Program as a measure of sample variance, therefore, low values among a sample of raters indicate that the raters in the assessment are relatively homogeneous, with heterogeneous raters. There are no problems with convergent validity on the tested models; the AVE value of each construct exceeds 0.5, which means that the construct has good reliability. The results of PLS bootstrapping calculations showed a significant direct relationship between variables, suggesting a link between anxiety and health screenings.CDA screening can be an option to overcome health screening anxiety because it informs test results with a tendency between healthy findings and the likelihood of cancer appearing, rather than active cancer cells.","PeriodicalId":513076,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Social and Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Social and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v2i10.354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out how anxiety affects cancer detection and how early detection efforts are carried out in conjunction with screening. The mixed methods study was conducted on 1002 random subjects. In addition, qualitative research models were conducted on laboratory specialists, health examiners and oncologists on CDA screening methods. This method does not cause reports of disease, but shows that there is a good tendency to cancer. The results of the study were processed using SEM PLS analysis using SmartPLS and expert opinion analysis using Facets. The expert source's opinion (expert decision) on the transfer of detection perception to screening using the CDA method is considered feasible and constructive. Reliability is calculated by the FACETS Program as a measure of sample variance, therefore, low values among a sample of raters indicate that the raters in the assessment are relatively homogeneous, with heterogeneous raters. There are no problems with convergent validity on the tested models; the AVE value of each construct exceeds 0.5, which means that the construct has good reliability. The results of PLS bootstrapping calculations showed a significant direct relationship between variables, suggesting a link between anxiety and health screenings.CDA screening can be an option to overcome health screening anxiety because it informs test results with a tendency between healthy findings and the likelihood of cancer appearing, rather than active cancer cells.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CDA 癌症筛查 焦虑策略 健康检查 癌症筛查
本研究旨在了解焦虑如何影响癌症检测,以及如何结合筛查开展早期检测工作。这项混合方法研究的对象是 1002 名随机受试者。此外,还就 CDA 筛查方法对实验室专家、体检人员和肿瘤学家进行了定性研究模型。这种方法不会导致疾病报告,但却显示出癌症的良好趋势。研究结果使用 SmartPLS 的 SEM PLS 分析和 Facets 的专家意见分析进行处理。专家来源关于使用 CDA 方法将检测感知转移到筛查的意见(专家决定)被认为是可行和有建设性的。FACETS 程序计算的信度是样本方差的度量,因此,评分者样本中的低值表明评估中的评分者是相对同质的,评分者是异质的。测试模型的收敛效度没有问题;每个构念的 AVE 值都超过了 0.5,这意味着构念具有良好的信度。PLS引导计算的结果表明,变量之间存在显著的直接关系,这表明焦虑与健康检查之间存在联系。CDA筛查可以作为克服健康检查焦虑的一种选择,因为它告知检查结果的是健康结果与癌症出现的可能性之间的趋势,而不是活跃的癌细胞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strategies For The Use Of Social Media In Promotions On Poyalisa Island, Batu Daka District, Tojo Una-Una District, Central Sulawesi Legal Review of Investment Implementation In Vietnam and In Indonesia Is Reviewed Based On Investment Regulations In Each Country Principal's Leadership Style In The Era Of Globalization In An Effort To Improve Teachers' Performance Teacher Performance at SMP Teuku Nyak Arif Fatih Bilingual School Pentahelix Model Collaboration In Shaping The Independence of Vagrants and Beggars CDA Cancer Screening Strategies For Anxiety Health Checkup Cancer Screening
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1