Is visceral osteopathy therapy effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100729
Luis Ceballos-Laita , Edzard Ernst , Andoni Carrasco-Uribarren , Germán Esteban-Tarcaya , Lucas Mamud-Meroni , Sandra Jiménez-del-Barrio
{"title":"Is visceral osteopathy therapy effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Luis Ceballos-Laita ,&nbsp;Edzard Ernst ,&nbsp;Andoni Carrasco-Uribarren ,&nbsp;Germán Esteban-Tarcaya ,&nbsp;Lucas Mamud-Meroni ,&nbsp;Sandra Jiménez-del-Barrio","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review with meta-analysis aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of visceral osteopathy (VO) in musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two independent reviewers searched in PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in November 2023 and extracted data for randomized controlled trials evaluating the clinical effectiveness of VO. The risk of bias and the certainty of evidence were assessed using the Risk-of-Bias tool 2 and the GRADE Profile, respectively. Meta-analyses were conducted using random effect models using RevMan 5.4. software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifteen studies were included in the qualitative and seven in the quantitative synthesis. For musculoskeletal disorders, the qualitative and quantitative synthesis suggested that VO produces no statistically significant changes in any outcome variable for patients with low back pain, neck pain or urinary incontinence. For non-musculoskeletal conditions, the qualitative synthesis showed that VO was not effective for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome, breast cancer, and very low weight preterm infants. Most of the studies were classified as high risk of bias and the certainty of evidence downgraded to low or very low.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>VO did not show any benefit in any musculoskeletal or non-musculoskeletal condition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 100729"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068924000221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This systematic review with meta-analysis aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of visceral osteopathy (VO) in musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal disorders.

Methods

Two independent reviewers searched in PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in November 2023 and extracted data for randomized controlled trials evaluating the clinical effectiveness of VO. The risk of bias and the certainty of evidence were assessed using the Risk-of-Bias tool 2 and the GRADE Profile, respectively. Meta-analyses were conducted using random effect models using RevMan 5.4. software.

Results

Fifteen studies were included in the qualitative and seven in the quantitative synthesis. For musculoskeletal disorders, the qualitative and quantitative synthesis suggested that VO produces no statistically significant changes in any outcome variable for patients with low back pain, neck pain or urinary incontinence. For non-musculoskeletal conditions, the qualitative synthesis showed that VO was not effective for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome, breast cancer, and very low weight preterm infants. Most of the studies were classified as high risk of bias and the certainty of evidence downgraded to low or very low.

Conclusion

VO did not show any benefit in any musculoskeletal or non-musculoskeletal condition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内脏整骨疗法有效吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析
方法两位独立审稿人于 2023 年 11 月在 PubMed、物理治疗证据数据库、Cochrane 图书馆、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库中进行了检索,并提取了评估内脏整骨疗法(VO)临床疗效的随机对照试验数据。分别使用偏倚风险工具 2 和 GRADE Profile 评估了偏倚风险和证据的确定性。使用 RevMan 5.4 软件的随机效应模型进行了元分析。结果 15 项研究被纳入定性综述,7 项研究被纳入定量综述。对于肌肉骨骼疾病,定性和定量综合研究表明,VO 对腰背痛、颈部疼痛或尿失禁患者的任何结果变量都不会产生统计学意义上的显著变化。对于非肌肉骨骼疾病,定性综述显示,VO 对治疗肠易激综合征、乳腺癌和超低体重早产儿无效。大多数研究被归类为高偏倚风险,证据的确定性降为低或极低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine is a peer-reviewed journal that provides for the publication of high quality research articles and review papers that are as broad as the many disciplines that influence and underpin the principles and practice of osteopathic medicine. Particular emphasis is given to basic science research, clinical epidemiology and health social science in relation to osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine. The Editorial Board encourages submission of articles based on both quantitative and qualitative research designs. The Editorial Board also aims to provide a forum for discourse and debate on any aspect of osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine with the aim of critically evaluating existing practices in regard to the diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neuromusculoskeletal disorders and somatic dysfunction. All manuscripts submitted to the IJOM are subject to a blinded review process. The categories currently available for publication include reports of original research, review papers, commentaries and articles related to clinical practice, including case reports. Further details can be found in the IJOM Instructions for Authors. Manuscripts are accepted for publication with the understanding that no substantial part has been, or will be published elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Dynamometry for the assessment of trunk muscle strength in postpartum women with pregnancy-related posterior pelvic girdle pain: A reliability study Evaluating perspectives, knowledge and behaviors of osteopathic medicine in a United States osteopathic medical school: A study in employee education and changes in understanding An appraisal of neuroimmune changes and potential benefits of osteopathic manipulative treatment integration with therapeutic management of post COVID-19 condition: A literature review Evidence-informed approach of sighs in the scope of osteopathic practice Autonomic nervous system and viscera-related responses to manual therapy: A narrative overview
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1