Social Determinants of Health and the Use of Community-Based Rehabilitation Following Stroke: Methodologic Considerations

Elizabeth R. Mormer MS, CCC-SLP , Sara B. Jones Berkeley PhD, MPH , Anna M. Johnson PhD, MSPH , Kristin Ressel MS, ATC , Shuqi Zhang MS , Amy M. Pastva PT, PhD, MA , Cheryl D. Bushnell MD, MHS , Pamela Duncan PT, PhD , Janet K. Freburger PT, PhD
{"title":"Social Determinants of Health and the Use of Community-Based Rehabilitation Following Stroke: Methodologic Considerations","authors":"Elizabeth R. Mormer MS, CCC-SLP ,&nbsp;Sara B. Jones Berkeley PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Anna M. Johnson PhD, MSPH ,&nbsp;Kristin Ressel MS, ATC ,&nbsp;Shuqi Zhang MS ,&nbsp;Amy M. Pastva PT, PhD, MA ,&nbsp;Cheryl D. Bushnell MD, MHS ,&nbsp;Pamela Duncan PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Janet K. Freburger PT, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social determinants are nonmedical factors frequently used to study disparities in health outcomes but have not been widely explored in regard to rehabilitation service utilization. In our National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development-funded study, Access to and Effectiveness of Community-Based Rehabilitation After Stroke, we reviewed several conceptual models and frameworks for the study of social determinants to inform our work. The overall objective of this special communication is to describe our approach to identifying, selecting, and using area-level measures of social determinants to explore the relationship between social determinants and rehabilitation use. We present our methods for developing a conceptual model and a methodologic framework for the selection of social determinant measures relevant to rehabilitation use, as well as an overview of publicly available data on social determinants. We then discuss the methodologic challenges encountered and future directions for this work.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"6 3","pages":"Article 100358"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524000569/pdfft?md5=8c3e6aa55e5627f9a4cc1549b6c5ed16&pid=1-s2.0-S2590109524000569-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524000569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social determinants are nonmedical factors frequently used to study disparities in health outcomes but have not been widely explored in regard to rehabilitation service utilization. In our National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development-funded study, Access to and Effectiveness of Community-Based Rehabilitation After Stroke, we reviewed several conceptual models and frameworks for the study of social determinants to inform our work. The overall objective of this special communication is to describe our approach to identifying, selecting, and using area-level measures of social determinants to explore the relationship between social determinants and rehabilitation use. We present our methods for developing a conceptual model and a methodologic framework for the selection of social determinant measures relevant to rehabilitation use, as well as an overview of publicly available data on social determinants. We then discuss the methodologic challenges encountered and future directions for this work.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康的社会决定因素与中风后社区康复的使用:方法学考虑因素
社会决定因素是经常用于研究健康结果差异的非医疗因素,但在康复服务利用方面尚未得到广泛探讨。在由美国国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所(National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development)资助的 "中风后社区康复的机会与效果 "研究中,我们回顾了研究社会决定因素的几个概念模型和框架,为我们的工作提供了参考。本特别通讯的总体目标是介绍我们识别、选择和使用地区级社会决定因素测量方法的方法,以探讨社会决定因素与康复使用之间的关系。我们介绍了我们开发概念模型的方法和选择与康复使用相关的社会决定因素测量方法框架,并概述了有关社会决定因素的公开数据。然后,我们讨论了在方法学方面遇到的挑战以及这项工作的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perceived Barriers to Leisure-Time Physical Activity Among Physically Active Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury Psychometrics of Wearable Devices Measuring Physical Activity in Ambulant Children With Gait Abnormalities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Robotic Rigor: Validity of the Kinarm End-Point Robot Visually Guided Reaching Test in Multiple Sclerosis The Effect of Sensory Reweighting on Postural Control and Cortical Activity in Parkinson's Disease: A Pilot Study The Impact of Executive Function on Retention and Compliance in Physical Therapy in Veterans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1