Collaborative grazing land science: using the nominal group technique (NGT) to facilitate decision making

Alia N. DeLong , Claire Friedrichsen , Elizabeth H. Boughton , Hilary Swain , Maria Silveira, , Brent Sellers
{"title":"Collaborative grazing land science: using the nominal group technique (NGT) to facilitate decision making","authors":"Alia N. DeLong ,&nbsp;Claire Friedrichsen ,&nbsp;Elizabeth H. Boughton ,&nbsp;Hilary Swain ,&nbsp;Maria Silveira, ,&nbsp;Brent Sellers","doi":"10.1016/j.rala.2024.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>Rapid changes in science require rapid development of solutions. Working with diverse groups of stakeholders is important for developing robust research programs.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Collaborative production (or coproduction) of knowledge can integrate multiple sources of knowledge from stakeholder groups such as farmers and ranchers, service providers, technical advisors, and nonprofit representatives.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>The nominal group technique (NGT) is one tool in coproduction of knowledge and is a simple and feasible methodology rangeland scientists can adopt in complex decision-making contexts.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>The Archbold-University of Florida Long-term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network used NGT with an advisory council of stakeholder representatives to develop priorities for their research program, particularly high-priority treatments and measurements.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Coproduced science identifies potential solutions more quickly than any group working on their own. Researchers can use NGT during collaborative processes to incorporate multiple sources of expert knowledge to create a more complete picture of a given situation.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":101057,"journal":{"name":"Rangelands","volume":"46 5","pages":"Pages 155-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangelands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052824000385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  • Rapid changes in science require rapid development of solutions. Working with diverse groups of stakeholders is important for developing robust research programs.
  • Collaborative production (or coproduction) of knowledge can integrate multiple sources of knowledge from stakeholder groups such as farmers and ranchers, service providers, technical advisors, and nonprofit representatives.
  • The nominal group technique (NGT) is one tool in coproduction of knowledge and is a simple and feasible methodology rangeland scientists can adopt in complex decision-making contexts.
  • The Archbold-University of Florida Long-term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network used NGT with an advisory council of stakeholder representatives to develop priorities for their research program, particularly high-priority treatments and measurements.
  • Coproduced science identifies potential solutions more quickly than any group working on their own. Researchers can use NGT during collaborative processes to incorporate multiple sources of expert knowledge to create a more complete picture of a given situation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合作牧场科学:利用名义小组技术(NGT)促进决策制定
-科学发展日新月异,需要迅速制定解决方案。与不同的利益相关者群体合作对于制定稳健的研究计划非常重要。-知识的合作生产(或共同生产)可以整合利益相关者群体(如农民和牧场主、服务提供商、技术顾问和非营利组织代表)的多种知识来源。-名义小组技术(NGT)是知识共同生产的一种工具,是牧场科学家在复杂的决策环境中可以采用的一种简单可行的方法。-Archbold-佛罗里达大学长期农业生态系统研究(LTAR)网络与利益相关者代表组成的咨询委员会一起使用 NGT 来制定研究计划的优先事项,特别是高度优先的处理和测量方法。研究人员可以在协作过程中使用 NGT,将多个专家知识来源结合起来,以更全面地了解特定情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Rangeland management practices in Somaliland: lessons learned from the Aroori Grazing Reserve Rates of change in invasive annual grass cover to inform management actions in sagebrush ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1