Barriers to Abortion among Women and Girls in Selected Districts of Nepal.

Parash Prasad Phuyal, Tejaswee Bhattarai, Prakash Dev Pant, Bishnu Devkota, Jivan Devkota, Madhav Prasad Dhakal, Sujan Karki, Jagadishwor Ghimire, Brittany Moore
{"title":"Barriers to Abortion among Women and Girls in Selected Districts of Nepal.","authors":"Parash Prasad Phuyal, Tejaswee Bhattarai, Prakash Dev Pant, Bishnu Devkota, Jivan Devkota, Madhav Prasad Dhakal, Sujan Karki, Jagadishwor Ghimire, Brittany Moore","doi":"10.33314/jnhrc.v22i01.4935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Even after two decades of legalization of abortion in Nepal, most women and girls still do not have knowledge on abortion legality and face abortion barriers. This study will explore perceived barriers to safe abortion and the factors associated with it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Mixed method study design was conducted in 30 wards of 20 Municipals of seven districts of Lumbini and Sudurpaschim provinces. Quantitative data was analyzed for 673 women of reproductive age of 15-49 years. For qualitative data, key informant interviews were conducted. The analysis was done on five different barriers and a composite variable was created from them.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most women and girls perceived social (34.6%), followed by family (30.6%), physical (30.6%), personal (29.5%), and health facility (14.9%) barriers to access safe abortion services. The key finding was that women and girls with knowledge on abortion legality were more likely to perceive barriers to abortion (AOR:2.31, CI:1.574-3.394). Women and girls with higher educational and economic status as well as Dalit women were less likely to perceive barriers to abortion services whereas never married women and girls perceived more barriers in accessing abortion services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women and girls perceived several barriers to access safe abortion services. Women who have better knowledge on abortion legality recognize more barriers regarding abortion. This highlights the importance of raising awareness of women and girls on abortion rights to empower them in recognizing and advocating for the removal of the obstacles that stop them from getting abortion services.</p>","PeriodicalId":16380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","volume":"22 1","pages":"12-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v22i01.4935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Even after two decades of legalization of abortion in Nepal, most women and girls still do not have knowledge on abortion legality and face abortion barriers. This study will explore perceived barriers to safe abortion and the factors associated with it.

Methods: A Mixed method study design was conducted in 30 wards of 20 Municipals of seven districts of Lumbini and Sudurpaschim provinces. Quantitative data was analyzed for 673 women of reproductive age of 15-49 years. For qualitative data, key informant interviews were conducted. The analysis was done on five different barriers and a composite variable was created from them.

Results: Most women and girls perceived social (34.6%), followed by family (30.6%), physical (30.6%), personal (29.5%), and health facility (14.9%) barriers to access safe abortion services. The key finding was that women and girls with knowledge on abortion legality were more likely to perceive barriers to abortion (AOR:2.31, CI:1.574-3.394). Women and girls with higher educational and economic status as well as Dalit women were less likely to perceive barriers to abortion services whereas never married women and girls perceived more barriers in accessing abortion services.

Conclusions: Women and girls perceived several barriers to access safe abortion services. Women who have better knowledge on abortion legality recognize more barriers regarding abortion. This highlights the importance of raising awareness of women and girls on abortion rights to empower them in recognizing and advocating for the removal of the obstacles that stop them from getting abortion services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼泊尔部分地区妇女和女孩堕胎的障碍。
背景:即使在尼泊尔堕胎合法化二十年之后,大多数妇女和女孩仍然不了解堕胎的合法性,并面临堕胎障碍。本研究将探讨安全堕胎的认知障碍及其相关因素:在蓝毗尼省和苏都帕斯金省 7 个县 20 个市的 30 个区开展了混合方法研究。对 673 名 15-49 岁育龄妇女的定量数据进行了分析。在定性数据方面,对关键信息提供者进行了访谈。对五种不同的障碍进行了分析,并从中创建了一个综合变量:大多数妇女和女孩认为在获得安全堕胎服务方面存在社会障碍(34.6%),其次是家庭障碍(30.6%)、身体障碍(30.6%)、个人障碍(29.5%)和医疗机构障碍(14.9%)。主要发现是,了解堕胎合法性的妇女和女孩更有可能认为存在堕胎障碍(AOR:2.31,CI:1.574-3.394)。教育程度较高、经济地位较高的妇女和女孩以及贱民妇女不太可能感知到人工流产服务的障碍,而从未结过婚的妇女和女孩在获得人工流产服务方面感知到更多障碍:结论:妇女和女童在获得安全人工流产服务方面存在多种障碍。对堕胎合法性有更多了解的妇女认识到堕胎方面的更多障碍。这凸显了提高妇女和女孩对堕胎权利认识的重要性,从而增强她们的能力,使她们能够认识到并倡导消除阻止她们获得堕胎服务的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles related to researches done in the field of biomedical sciences related to all the discipline of the medical sciences, medical education, public health, health care management, including ethical and social issues pertaining to health. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Editorial, Guest Editorial, Viewpoint and letter to the editor are solicited by the editorial board. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding manuscript submission and processing at JNHRC.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Profile of Peripheral Artery Disease of Patients Attending Shahid Gangalal National Heart Center, Janakpurdham, Nepal. Clinical Profile of posterior segment in high Myopia. Clinical Profile of Thoracoscopic Bullectomy in Treatment of Pneumothorax. Comparison of Lintula Score with Modified Alvarado Score for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Adults. Comparison of Recovery Rate of Otomycosis using One-Percent Gentian Violet and One-Percent Clotrimazole Topical Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1