A Comparative Study on Characteristics and Antibacterial Capacity of Cotton Fabrics Dyed with Reactive Dye and Diospyros Mollis Extract.

IF 2.5 4区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ChemistryOpen Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1002/open.202400130
Trong Tuan Nguyen, Thuy Chinh Nguyen, Thi Thu Trang Nguyen, Manh Ha Nguyen, Hoang Thai
{"title":"A Comparative Study on Characteristics and Antibacterial Capacity of Cotton Fabrics Dyed with Reactive Dye and Diospyros Mollis Extract.","authors":"Trong Tuan Nguyen, Thuy Chinh Nguyen, Thi Thu Trang Nguyen, Manh Ha Nguyen, Hoang Thai","doi":"10.1002/open.202400130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article focuses on comparing the characteristics of cotton fabric dyed with Diospyros mollis extract (DME) solution and that of cotton fabric dyed with the reactive dye. The parameters of the cotton fabric after dyeing with both types of dyes were assessed, including color strength (K/S), structural morphology, infrared spectrum, antibacterial properties, UV resistance, color fastness to washing, rubbing, light, moisture absorption, breathability, and wastewater indices. The obtained results show that the K/S value of cotton fabric dyed with DME solution is slightly lower than that of cotton fabric dyed with the reactive dye, 18.52 and 19.36, respectively. The cotton fabric dyed with the reactive dye does not exhibit antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, whereas the antibacterial effectiveness against these bacteria for cotton fabric dyed with DME solution is 99.99 %. The UV protection capability of cotton fabric dyed with DME solution is superior to cotton fabric dyed with the reactive dye. The BOD/COD ratio of wastewater from the dyeing process with DME is higher than that of the reactive dye, with values of 0.70 and 0.32, respectively. The findings of this study indicate the superior ability of using DME solution as compared to the reactive dye, which is promising as a natural dye for fabric in medical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9831,"journal":{"name":"ChemistryOpen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemistryOpen","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/open.202400130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on comparing the characteristics of cotton fabric dyed with Diospyros mollis extract (DME) solution and that of cotton fabric dyed with the reactive dye. The parameters of the cotton fabric after dyeing with both types of dyes were assessed, including color strength (K/S), structural morphology, infrared spectrum, antibacterial properties, UV resistance, color fastness to washing, rubbing, light, moisture absorption, breathability, and wastewater indices. The obtained results show that the K/S value of cotton fabric dyed with DME solution is slightly lower than that of cotton fabric dyed with the reactive dye, 18.52 and 19.36, respectively. The cotton fabric dyed with the reactive dye does not exhibit antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, whereas the antibacterial effectiveness against these bacteria for cotton fabric dyed with DME solution is 99.99 %. The UV protection capability of cotton fabric dyed with DME solution is superior to cotton fabric dyed with the reactive dye. The BOD/COD ratio of wastewater from the dyeing process with DME is higher than that of the reactive dye, with values of 0.70 and 0.32, respectively. The findings of this study indicate the superior ability of using DME solution as compared to the reactive dye, which is promising as a natural dye for fabric in medical applications.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用活性染料和洋金花提取物染色的棉织物的特性和抗菌能力比较研究
本文主要比较了用麝香草提取物(DME)溶液染色的棉织物和用活性染料染色的棉织物的特性。对两种染料染色后棉织物的各项参数进行了评估,包括染色强度(K/S)、结构形态、红外光谱、抗菌性、抗紫外线性、耐洗色牢度、耐摩擦色牢度、耐光色牢度、吸湿性、透气性和废水指数。结果表明,用二甲醚溶液染色的棉织物的 K/S 值略低于用活性染料染色的棉织物,分别为 18.52 和 19.36。用活性染料染色的棉织物对大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌没有抗菌活性,而用二甲醚溶液染色的棉织物对这些细菌的抗菌效果为 99.99%。用二甲醚溶液染色的棉织物的防紫外线能力优于用活性染料染色的棉织物。用二甲醚染色过程中产生的废水的生化需氧量/化学需氧量比值分别为 0.70 和 0.32,高于活性染料。这项研究结果表明,与活性染料相比,二甲醚溶液的染色能力更强,有望成为医疗织物的天然染料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ChemistryOpen
ChemistryOpen CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: ChemistryOpen is a multidisciplinary, gold-road open-access, international forum for the publication of outstanding Reviews, Full Papers, and Communications from all areas of chemistry and related fields. It is co-owned by 16 continental European Chemical Societies, who have banded together in the alliance called ChemPubSoc Europe for the purpose of publishing high-quality journals in the field of chemistry and its border disciplines. As some of the governments of the countries represented in ChemPubSoc Europe have strongly recommended that the research conducted with their funding is freely accessible for all readers (Open Access), ChemPubSoc Europe was concerned that no journal for which the ethical standards were monitored by a chemical society was available for such papers. ChemistryOpen fills this gap.
期刊最新文献
Quantitative Spermidine Detection in Cosmetics using an Organic Transistor-based Chemical Sensor. Facile Determination of Aluminum Content in Industrial Brine by Investigating the Effects of Buffer Systems. Interplay of Na Substitution in Magnetic Interaction and Photocatalytic Properties of Ca1-xNaxTi0.5Ta0.5O3 Perovskite Nanoparticles. Oxidation of Cyclohexane to Cyclohexanol/Cyclohexanone Using Sol-Gel-Encapsulated Unspecific Peroxygenase from Agrocybe aegerita. Utilization of Cobalt and its Oxide/Hydroxide Mediated by Ionic Liquids/Deep Eutectic Solvents as Catalysts in Water Splitting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1