The Turkish version of the Skin Tear Knowledge Assessment Instrument (OASES): Validity and reliability study

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY International Wound Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1111/iwj.70013
Hatice Yüceler Kaçmaz, Ayişe Karadağ, Seda Akutay, Derya Çobanoğlu Aktan
{"title":"The Turkish version of the Skin Tear Knowledge Assessment Instrument (OASES): Validity and reliability study","authors":"Hatice Yüceler Kaçmaz,&nbsp;Ayişe Karadağ,&nbsp;Seda Akutay,&nbsp;Derya Çobanoğlu Aktan","doi":"10.1111/iwj.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study was conducted to adapt the Skin Tear Knowledge Assessment Instrument (OASES) into Turkish and to verify its validity and reliability. This study was conducted on 314 nurses in Türkiye between November 2023 and February 2024 to test the psychometric properties of OASES. The instrument consists of 20 items clustered into six domains. The cultural adaptation process was carried out according to the International Testing Commission guidelines: Turkish translation, expert panel, content validity, translation back to English, preliminary study and the final version of the instrument. To check the validity of the multiple-choice test, item difficulty and discriminating index were analysed. The reliability of the instrument was evaluated to the retest 14 days after the first test. Scale level content validity by 11 experts in wound care was 0,97 (I-CVI = 0.8–1.0). In the item analysed of the OASES, the item difficulty index was 0,51 (<i>p</i>-value = 0.34–0.76) and the discriminating index was 0.40 (<i>D</i>-value = 0.26–0.51). The 2-week test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient of the overall instrument was 0.90 (95% CI = 0.79–0.95). The Turkish version of OASES is a valid and reliable measurement instrument to evaluate nurses' knowledge levels regarding skin tears with acceptable psychometric properties. It can be applied in nursing education, research and practice to evaluate the knowledge of Turkish speaking nurses about skin tears.</p>","PeriodicalId":14451,"journal":{"name":"International Wound Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11292666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.70013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to adapt the Skin Tear Knowledge Assessment Instrument (OASES) into Turkish and to verify its validity and reliability. This study was conducted on 314 nurses in Türkiye between November 2023 and February 2024 to test the psychometric properties of OASES. The instrument consists of 20 items clustered into six domains. The cultural adaptation process was carried out according to the International Testing Commission guidelines: Turkish translation, expert panel, content validity, translation back to English, preliminary study and the final version of the instrument. To check the validity of the multiple-choice test, item difficulty and discriminating index were analysed. The reliability of the instrument was evaluated to the retest 14 days after the first test. Scale level content validity by 11 experts in wound care was 0,97 (I-CVI = 0.8–1.0). In the item analysed of the OASES, the item difficulty index was 0,51 (p-value = 0.34–0.76) and the discriminating index was 0.40 (D-value = 0.26–0.51). The 2-week test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient of the overall instrument was 0.90 (95% CI = 0.79–0.95). The Turkish version of OASES is a valid and reliable measurement instrument to evaluate nurses' knowledge levels regarding skin tears with acceptable psychometric properties. It can be applied in nursing education, research and practice to evaluate the knowledge of Turkish speaking nurses about skin tears.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其版皮肤撕裂知识评估工具(OASES):有效性和可靠性研究。
本研究旨在将皮肤撕裂知识评估工具(OASES)改编成土耳其语,并验证其有效性和可靠性。本研究于 2023 年 11 月至 2024 年 2 月期间对土耳其的 314 名护士进行了测试,以检验 OASES 的心理测量特性。该工具由 20 个项目组成,分为六个领域。文化适应过程根据国际测试委员会的指导方针进行:土耳其语翻译、专家小组、内容效度、翻译成英语、初步研究和最终版本。为了检验多项选择测验的有效性,对题目难度和区分度指数进行了分析。在首次测试 14 天后进行了重测,以评估该工具的可靠性。由 11 位伤口护理专家进行的量表内容效度为 0.97(I-CVI = 0.8-1.0)。在 OASES 的项目分析中,项目难度指数为 0.51(P 值 = 0.34-0.76),区分指数为 0.40(D 值 = 0.26-0.51)。整个工具的两周重复测试类内相关系数为 0.90(95% CI = 0.79-0.95)。土耳其版 OASES 是一种有效、可靠的测量工具,可用于评估护士对皮肤撕裂的认知水平,其心理测量学特性是可以接受的。该工具可用于护理教育、研究和实践,以评估土耳其语护士对皮肤裂伤的了解程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Wound Journal
International Wound Journal DERMATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.90%
发文量
266
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Editors welcome papers on all aspects of prevention and treatment of wounds and associated conditions in the fields of surgery, dermatology, oncology, nursing, radiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and podiatry. The Journal accepts papers in the following categories: - Research papers - Review articles - Clinical studies - Letters - News and Views: international perspectives, education initiatives, guidelines and different activities of groups and societies. Calendar of events The Editors are supported by a board of international experts and a panel of reviewers across a range of disciplines and specialties which ensures only the most current and relevant research is published.
期刊最新文献
A randomised controlled phase II trial to examine the feasibility of using hyper-oxygenated fatty acids (HOFA) to prevent facial pressure injuries from medical devices among adults admitted to intensive care-A research protocol. Advancements in seawater immersion wound management: Current treatments and innovations. Antimicrobial effects of a multimodal wound matrix against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro and an in vivo porcine wound model. Artificial intelligence's suggestions for level of amputation in diabetic foot ulcers are highly correlated with those of clinicians, only with exception of hindfoot amputations. Co-creation and evaluation of an algorithm for the development of a mobile application for wound care among new graduate nurses: A mixed methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1