Percutaneous Achilles tendon tenotomy in clubfoot with a blade or a needle: a single-centre randomized controlled noninferiority trial.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Bone & Joint Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.106B8.BJJ-2024-0094.R1
Manon Pigeolet, Jabbar Ghufran Syed, Sadia Ahmed, Muhammad A Chinoy, Mansoor A Khan
{"title":"Percutaneous Achilles tendon tenotomy in clubfoot with a blade or a needle: a single-centre randomized controlled noninferiority trial.","authors":"Manon Pigeolet, Jabbar Ghufran Syed, Sadia Ahmed, Muhammad A Chinoy, Mansoor A Khan","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B8.BJJ-2024-0094.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The gold standard for percutaneous Achilles tendon tenotomy during the Ponseti treatment for idiopathic clubfoot is a tenotomy with a No. 15 blade. This trial aims to establish the technique where the tenotomy is performed with a large-bore needle as noninferior to the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomized feet from children aged below 36 months with idiopathic clubfoot on a 1:1 basis in either the blade or needle group. Follow-up was conducted at three weeks and three months postoperatively, where dorsiflexion range, Pirani scores, and complications were recorded. The noninferiority margin was set at 4° difference in dorsiflexion range at three months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The blade group had more dorsiflexion at both follow-up consultations: 18.36° versus 18.03° (p = 0.115) at three weeks and 18.96° versus 18.26° (p = 0.001) at three months. The difference of the mean at three months 0.7° is well below the noninferiority margin of 4°. There was no significant difference in Pirani scores. The blade group had more extensive scar marks at three months than the needle group (8 vs 2). No major complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The needle tenotomy is noninferior to the blade tenotomy for usage in Ponseti treatment for idiopathic clubfoot in children aged below 36 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 8","pages":"871-878"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B8.BJJ-2024-0094.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The gold standard for percutaneous Achilles tendon tenotomy during the Ponseti treatment for idiopathic clubfoot is a tenotomy with a No. 15 blade. This trial aims to establish the technique where the tenotomy is performed with a large-bore needle as noninferior to the gold standard.

Methods: We randomized feet from children aged below 36 months with idiopathic clubfoot on a 1:1 basis in either the blade or needle group. Follow-up was conducted at three weeks and three months postoperatively, where dorsiflexion range, Pirani scores, and complications were recorded. The noninferiority margin was set at 4° difference in dorsiflexion range at three months postoperatively.

Results: The blade group had more dorsiflexion at both follow-up consultations: 18.36° versus 18.03° (p = 0.115) at three weeks and 18.96° versus 18.26° (p = 0.001) at three months. The difference of the mean at three months 0.7° is well below the noninferiority margin of 4°. There was no significant difference in Pirani scores. The blade group had more extensive scar marks at three months than the needle group (8 vs 2). No major complications were recorded.

Conclusion: The needle tenotomy is noninferior to the blade tenotomy for usage in Ponseti treatment for idiopathic clubfoot in children aged below 36 months.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用刀片还是针头对足癣进行经皮跟腱腱鞘切除术:单中心随机对照非劣效性试验。
目的:在Ponseti治疗特发性马蹄内翻足的过程中,经皮跟腱腱鞘切开术的金标准是使用15号刀片进行腱鞘切开术。本试验旨在确定使用大口径针头进行腱膜切开术的技术不逊于金标准:方法:我们按 1:1 的比例将 36 个月以下的特发性马蹄内翻足患儿的脚随机分为刀片组和针组。术后三周和三个月进行随访,记录足背伸范围、皮拉尼评分和并发症。术后三个月时的背屈幅度相差 4°为非劣效边际:结果:在两次复诊时,刀片组的背屈幅度更大:三周时为 18.36° 对 18.03° (p = 0.115),三个月时为 18.96° 对 18.26° (p = 0.001)。三个月时的平均差异为 0.7°,远低于 4°的非劣效界限。皮拉尼评分无明显差异。刀片组在三个月时的疤痕比针头组更广泛(8 对 2)。无重大并发症记录:针式腱膜切开术在用于 36 个月以下儿童特发性马蹄内翻足的 Ponseti 治疗中并不逊色于刀式腱膜切开术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Contemporary insights into spinopelvic mechanics. Core Outcome Domains for Elbow Replacement (CODER). Defining multilevel developmental cervical spinal stenosis using MRI. Delayed fixation of distal radial fractures beyond three weeks after initial failed closed reduction increases the odds of reoperation. Detection, classification, and characterization of proximal humerus fractures on plain radiographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1