Enhancing infection preventionist certification success through a structured training program.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES American journal of infection control Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2024.07.015
Kelly Holmes, Kelley M Boston, Jennifer McCarty, Sandi Steinfeld, Virginia Kennedy
{"title":"Enhancing infection preventionist certification success through a structured training program.","authors":"Kelly Holmes, Kelley M Boston, Jennifer McCarty, Sandi Steinfeld, Virginia Kennedy","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2024.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Certification in infection control (CIC) is a standardized indicator of the knowledge and competencies essential for effective infection prevention practice. Evidence measuring success of training programs for certfication in infection control is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2017 through 2023, 51 novice infection preventionists (IPs) were enrolled in a training program that combined didactic learning, application of knowledge in practice, and mentorship from advanced-practice and near-peer IPs. Participants were tracked through completion of certification examination and pass rates were compared with rates for 2023 CIC candidates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants engaged in the training program attempted the CIC examination. The training group had a pass rate of 98%. This is 27% higher than the most recent rate published by Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) of 71%.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Participants were significantly more likely to pass the CIC exam on the first try, showing that a supported, competency-based training program can be successful in supporting novice IPs in certification success.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Building foundational knowledge on key concepts in infection prevention and control and enhancing learning through supervised, direct application of skills improves CIC certification exam pass rates and supports progression of early career IPs to more independent practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2024.07.015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Certification in infection control (CIC) is a standardized indicator of the knowledge and competencies essential for effective infection prevention practice. Evidence measuring success of training programs for certfication in infection control is limited.

Methods: From 2017 through 2023, 51 novice infection preventionists (IPs) were enrolled in a training program that combined didactic learning, application of knowledge in practice, and mentorship from advanced-practice and near-peer IPs. Participants were tracked through completion of certification examination and pass rates were compared with rates for 2023 CIC candidates.

Results: All participants engaged in the training program attempted the CIC examination. The training group had a pass rate of 98%. This is 27% higher than the most recent rate published by Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) of 71%.

Discussion: Participants were significantly more likely to pass the CIC exam on the first try, showing that a supported, competency-based training program can be successful in supporting novice IPs in certification success.

Conclusions: Building foundational knowledge on key concepts in infection prevention and control and enhancing learning through supervised, direct application of skills improves CIC certification exam pass rates and supports progression of early career IPs to more independent practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过结构化培训计划提高感染预防师认证的成功率。
背景:感染控制和预防认证(CIC)是衡量有效预防感染实践所必需的知识和能力的标准化指标。衡量感染控制认证培训项目成功与否的证据十分有限:从 2017 年到 2023 年,51 名感染预防新手(IP)参加了一项培训计划,该计划结合了说教式学习、实践中的知识应用以及高级实践和近似 IP 的指导。对参加者完成认证考试的情况进行跟踪,并将通过率与 2023 年 CIC 候选人的通过率进行比较:结果:所有参加培训计划的学员都参加了CIC考试。培训组的通过率为 98%。这比感染控制与流行病学认证委员会(CBIC)公布的最新通过率 71% 高出 27%:讨论:学员首次通过 CIC 考试的几率明显增加,这表明基于能力的支持性培训计划可以成功帮助 IP 新手成功通过认证:结论:建立感染预防与控制关键概念的基础知识,并通过监督、直接应用技能来加强学习,可提高 CIC 认证考试的通过率,并支持职业生涯初期的 IP 逐步走向更独立的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
期刊最新文献
Spine surgical site infection outcome with preoperative application of a pre-saturated 10% povidone-iodine nasal decolonization product in a 32-bed surgical hospital. Total Outward Leakage of Face-Worn Products Used by The General Public for Source Control. Ralstonia mannitolilytica infection in a tertiary care centre: an outbreak report. Integrating Residents' Rights and Infection Prevention in Nursing Homes: Summary of the Infection Control Advocate and Resident Education (ICARE) Learning Modules Pilot for Long-term Care Ombudsmen, Residents, and Other Nursing Home Advocates. Integration of an electronic hand hygiene auditing system with electronic health records using machine learning to predict hospital-acquired infection in a healthcare setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1