Effectiveness of caring behaviours course on decision-making and caring behaviours in undergraduate nursing students: An experimental study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1111/scs.13288
Cahide Ayik, Gülşah Gürol Arslan
{"title":"Effectiveness of caring behaviours course on decision-making and caring behaviours in undergraduate nursing students: An experimental study.","authors":"Cahide Ayik, Gülşah Gürol Arslan","doi":"10.1111/scs.13288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although caring is a core principle of the nursing profession, students often lack the knowledge, comprehension and ability to integrate care into all aspects of nursing practice. Students may have few opportunities to practise caring behaviours on patients who create the impression of providing care and elicit a feeling of receiving care. Studies of strategies to enhance caring behaviours in nursing education are limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This experimental study aimed to examine the effect of nursing caring behaviours course based on interactive learning strategies on the caring behaviours and decision-making abilities of nursing students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A purposive sample of 50 undergraduate students was recruited from a faculty of nursing. Students in the intervention group (n = 24) received 2 h of training per week for 14 weeks in accordance with caring behaviours course based on interactive learning strategies including discussion, brainstorming, concept mapping, reflection and simulation training. Nursing students in the control group (n = 26) received training according to other elective courses in the curriculum. Data were measured at the baseline time point, 7th week and 14th week with the Caring Behaviours Inventory and Nursing Decision-Making Instrument. Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Friedman test and mixed repeated measures ANOVA were used to assess the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was determined in terms of baseline caring behaviours and decision-making scores between the intervention and control groups (p > 0.05). A significant difference in caring behaviours between the two groups and time effect was not found (p > 0.05). However, there was a significant interaction between time and groups (F = 3.484, p = 0.047). There was a significant increase in the decision-making in intervention groups over time (F = 9.372, p < 0.001) and interaction between time and groups (F = 4.160, p = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A deliberate strategy to raise students' awareness of caring behaviours and incorporate interactive learning methods into education enhances both caring behaviours and clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":48171,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"864-875"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.13288","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although caring is a core principle of the nursing profession, students often lack the knowledge, comprehension and ability to integrate care into all aspects of nursing practice. Students may have few opportunities to practise caring behaviours on patients who create the impression of providing care and elicit a feeling of receiving care. Studies of strategies to enhance caring behaviours in nursing education are limited.

Aim: This experimental study aimed to examine the effect of nursing caring behaviours course based on interactive learning strategies on the caring behaviours and decision-making abilities of nursing students.

Methods: A purposive sample of 50 undergraduate students was recruited from a faculty of nursing. Students in the intervention group (n = 24) received 2 h of training per week for 14 weeks in accordance with caring behaviours course based on interactive learning strategies including discussion, brainstorming, concept mapping, reflection and simulation training. Nursing students in the control group (n = 26) received training according to other elective courses in the curriculum. Data were measured at the baseline time point, 7th week and 14th week with the Caring Behaviours Inventory and Nursing Decision-Making Instrument. Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Friedman test and mixed repeated measures ANOVA were used to assess the data.

Results: No significant difference was determined in terms of baseline caring behaviours and decision-making scores between the intervention and control groups (p > 0.05). A significant difference in caring behaviours between the two groups and time effect was not found (p > 0.05). However, there was a significant interaction between time and groups (F = 3.484, p = 0.047). There was a significant increase in the decision-making in intervention groups over time (F = 9.372, p < 0.001) and interaction between time and groups (F = 4.160, p = 0.019).

Conclusions: A deliberate strategy to raise students' awareness of caring behaviours and incorporate interactive learning methods into education enhances both caring behaviours and clinical decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关爱行为课程对护理本科生决策和关爱行为的影响:一项实验研究。
背景:虽然护理是护理专业的核心原则,但学生往往缺乏将护理融入护理实践各个方面的知识、理解和能力。学生可能很少有机会在病人身上练习护理行为,而病人会给他们留下提供护理的印象,并引起接受护理的感觉。本实验研究旨在探讨基于互动学习策略的护理关怀行为课程对护理专业学生关怀行为和决策能力的影响:方法:从护理学院招募 50 名本科生作为目的性样本。干预组的学生(n = 24)在为期 14 周的时间里,每周接受 2 小时的护理行为课程培训,培训采用互动学习策略,包括讨论、头脑风暴、概念图、反思和模拟训练。对照组的护理专业学生(26 人)则根据课程中的其他选修课程接受培训。在基线时间点、第 7 周和第 14 周使用 "护理行为量表 "和 "护理决策工具 "测量数据。数据评估采用了卡方检验、曼-惠特尼 U 检验、弗里德曼检验和混合重复测量方差分析:结果:干预组和对照组的基线护理行为和决策得分无明显差异(P>0.05)。干预组和对照组在护理行为和时间效应方面没有发现明显差异(P > 0.05)。然而,时间与组别之间存在明显的交互作用(F = 3.484,p = 0.047)。随着时间的推移,干预组的决策能力明显提高(F = 9.372,p 结论:干预组的决策能力明显提高:有意识地提高学生对护理行为的认识,并将互动学习方法纳入教学,可增强护理行为和临床决策能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences is an established quarterly, peer reviewed Journal with an outstanding international reputation. As the official publication of the Nordic College of Caring Science, the Journal shares their mission to contribute to the development and advancement of scientific knowledge on caring related to health, well-being, illness and the alleviation of human suffering. The emphasis is on research that has a patient, family and community focus and which promotes an interdisciplinary team approach. Of special interest are scholarly articles addressing and initiating dialogue on theoretical, empirical and methodological concerns related to critical issues. All articles are expected to demonstrate respect for human dignity and accountability to society. In addition to original research the Journal also publishes reviews, meta-syntheses and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Exploring young adults' experiences with food allergy during their teenage years: A practice research study. Factors influencing job satisfaction and professional competencies in clinical practice among internationally educated nurses during the migration journey: A mixed-methods systematic review. Navigating parenthood in the face of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A qualitative exploration of partner experiences. Meaning-oriented thematic analysis grounded in reflective lifeworld research-A holistic approach for caring science research. Catalysts for change: A qualitative study of middle managers' perception of nursing professional competence in primary healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1