Modeling passenger comfort in turboprop aircraft using objective measures.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.3233/WOR-230700
Yu Wolf Song, Anna S Reichherzer, Xinhe Yao, Gerbera Vledder, Britta Herbig, Michael Bellmann, Victor Norrefeldt, Peter Vink, Neil Mansfield
{"title":"Modeling passenger comfort in turboprop aircraft using objective measures.","authors":"Yu Wolf Song, Anna S Reichherzer, Xinhe Yao, Gerbera Vledder, Britta Herbig, Michael Bellmann, Victor Norrefeldt, Peter Vink, Neil Mansfield","doi":"10.3233/WOR-230700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A quantitative comfort model will aid in evaluating comfort levels of various target groups before the actual flight of an airplane. However, constructing the model is always a challenge due to the complexity of the phenomenon.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this paper, we present quantitative comfort models to predict the (dis)comfort of passengers flying with turboprops based on objective measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-seven participants took part in two experiments conducted during real flights, during which forty of them had environmental and personal factors recorded using (self-developed) measurement tools. The collected data were analyzed to model the relations between objective measures and subjective feelings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two preliminary models based on gradient boosting regression were developed. The models were able to predict the changes in comfort and discomfort of individual passengers with an accuracy of 0.12±0.01 and 0.21±0.01 regarding normalized comfort and discomfort scores, respectively. Additionally, contributions of different factors were highlighted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The outcomes of the models show that we took a step forward in modeling the human comfort experience using objective measurements. Anthropometry (including age), seat positions, time duration, and row (noise) emerged as leading factors influencing the feeling of (dis)comfort in turboprop planes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-230700","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A quantitative comfort model will aid in evaluating comfort levels of various target groups before the actual flight of an airplane. However, constructing the model is always a challenge due to the complexity of the phenomenon.

Objectives: In this paper, we present quantitative comfort models to predict the (dis)comfort of passengers flying with turboprops based on objective measures.

Methods: Ninety-seven participants took part in two experiments conducted during real flights, during which forty of them had environmental and personal factors recorded using (self-developed) measurement tools. The collected data were analyzed to model the relations between objective measures and subjective feelings.

Results: Two preliminary models based on gradient boosting regression were developed. The models were able to predict the changes in comfort and discomfort of individual passengers with an accuracy of 0.12±0.01 and 0.21±0.01 regarding normalized comfort and discomfort scores, respectively. Additionally, contributions of different factors were highlighted.

Conclusion: The outcomes of the models show that we took a step forward in modeling the human comfort experience using objective measurements. Anthropometry (including age), seat positions, time duration, and row (noise) emerged as leading factors influencing the feeling of (dis)comfort in turboprop planes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用客观指标模拟涡轮螺旋桨飞机的乘客舒适度。
背景:定量舒适度模型有助于在飞机实际飞行前评估不同目标群体的舒适度。然而,由于现象的复杂性,构建模型始终是一项挑战:本文介绍了基于客观测量的定量舒适度模型,以预测乘坐涡轮螺旋桨飞机的乘客的(不)舒适度:方法:97 名参与者参加了在实际飞行中进行的两次实验,其中 40 人使用(自行开发的)测量工具记录了环境和个人因素。对收集到的数据进行分析,以建立客观测量和主观感受之间的关系模型:结果:建立了两个基于梯度提升回归的初步模型。这些模型能够预测单个乘客舒适度和不适度的变化,归一化舒适度和不适度评分的准确度分别为 0.12±0.01 和 0.21±0.01。此外,不同因素的贡献也得到了强调:这些模型的结果表明,我们在利用客观测量数据建立人体舒适度模型方面向前迈进了一步。人体测量(包括年龄)、座位位置、持续时间和行列(噪音)成为影响涡轮螺旋桨飞机舒适感的主要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
期刊最新文献
Participatory risk diagnosis: A preliminary approach to confined space work in the oil, gas, and petrochemical industries. A study on the correlation between annual noise exposure (ANE) and auditory attention, as well as hearing loss in military personnel. The relationship between night shift-work and thyroid nodule: a field study among the employees of Yazd Electricity Company. Cognitive failures and hand/neck discomfort: Does smartphone addiction contribute? 35 years of excellence: Celebrating WORK's journey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1