Milestones in Surgical Complication Reporting: Clavien-Dindo Classification 20 Years and Comprehensive Complication Index 10 Years.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006471
Fariba Abbassi, Matthias Pfister, Katharina L Lucas, Anja Domenghino, Milo A Puhan, Pierre-Alain Clavien
{"title":"Milestones in Surgical Complication Reporting: Clavien-Dindo Classification 20 Years and Comprehensive Complication Index 10 Years.","authors":"Fariba Abbassi, Matthias Pfister, Katharina L Lucas, Anja Domenghino, Milo A Puhan, Pierre-Alain Clavien","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide improved guidance for the consistent application of the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI ® ) in challenging clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Standardized outcome reporting is key for the proper assessment of surgical procedures. A recent consensus conference recommended the CDC and the CCI ® for assessing postoperative morbidity. Several challenging scenarios for grading complications still require evidence-based guidance, and the use of the 2 metrics in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed the use of the CDC and CCI ® as an outcome measure in a systematic literature search. In addition, we asked 163 international surgeons to critically evaluate and independently grade complications in 20 complex clinical scenarios. Finally, a Core Group of 5 experts used this information to develop consistent recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Until July 2023, 1327 RCTs selected the CDC and/or CCI ® to assess morbidity. Annual use was steadily increasing with now over 200 new RCTs per year. However, only a third (n = 335) of published RCTs provided the complete range of CDC grades, including all subgrades. Eighty-nine out of 163 surgeons (response rate: 55%) completed the questionnaire that served as a basis for the recommendations: repetitive interventions that are required to treat one complication, complications followed by further complications, complications occurring before referral, and expected and unrelated complications to the original procedure should all be counted separately and included in the CCI ® . Invasive blank diagnostic interventions should not be considered a complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The increasing use of the CDC and CCI ® in RCTs highlights the importance of their standardized application. The current consensus on various difficult scenarios may offer novel guidance for the consistent use of the CDC and CCI ® , aiming to improve complication reporting and better quality control, ultimately benefiting all health care stakeholders and, first and foremost, all patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006471","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To provide improved guidance for the consistent application of the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI ® ) in challenging clinical scenarios.

Background: Standardized outcome reporting is key for the proper assessment of surgical procedures. A recent consensus conference recommended the CDC and the CCI ® for assessing postoperative morbidity. Several challenging scenarios for grading complications still require evidence-based guidance, and the use of the 2 metrics in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains unexplored.

Methods: We assessed the use of the CDC and CCI ® as an outcome measure in a systematic literature search. In addition, we asked 163 international surgeons to critically evaluate and independently grade complications in 20 complex clinical scenarios. Finally, a Core Group of 5 experts used this information to develop consistent recommendations.

Results: Until July 2023, 1327 RCTs selected the CDC and/or CCI ® to assess morbidity. Annual use was steadily increasing with now over 200 new RCTs per year. However, only a third (n = 335) of published RCTs provided the complete range of CDC grades, including all subgrades. Eighty-nine out of 163 surgeons (response rate: 55%) completed the questionnaire that served as a basis for the recommendations: repetitive interventions that are required to treat one complication, complications followed by further complications, complications occurring before referral, and expected and unrelated complications to the original procedure should all be counted separately and included in the CCI ® . Invasive blank diagnostic interventions should not be considered a complication.

Conclusions: The increasing use of the CDC and CCI ® in RCTs highlights the importance of their standardized application. The current consensus on various difficult scenarios may offer novel guidance for the consistent use of the CDC and CCI ® , aiming to improve complication reporting and better quality control, ultimately benefiting all health care stakeholders and, first and foremost, all patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外科并发症报告的里程碑。Clavien-Dindo 分级 20 年和综合并发症指数 (CCI®) 10 年。
摘要为在具有挑战性的临床场景中一致应用克拉维恩-丁多分类法(CDC)和综合并发症指数(CCI®)提供更好的指导:背景:标准化的结果报告是正确评估外科手术的关键。最近召开的一次共识会议推荐使用 CDC 和 CCI® 评估术后发病率。一些具有挑战性的并发症分级方案仍需要循证指导,而这两个指标在 RCT 中的使用仍有待探索:方法:我们在系统性文献检索中评估了将 CDC 和 CCI® 作为结果衡量标准的使用情况。此外,我们请 163 位国际外科医生对 20 个复杂临床场景中的并发症进行批判性评估和独立分级。最后,由五位专家组成的核心小组利用这些信息制定了一致的建议:截至 2023 年 7 月,共有 1327 项 RCT 选择 CDC 和/或 CCI® 来评估发病率。每年的使用量都在稳步增长,目前每年新增的RCT超过200项。然而,只有三分之一(n=335)的已发表 RCT 提供了完整的 CDC 分级范围,包括所有子等级。163 位外科医生中有 89 位(回复率为 55%)完成了作为建议依据的问卷调查:治疗一种并发症所需的重复性干预、随后出现的并发症、转诊前出现的并发症以及与原始手术无关的预期并发症均应单独计算并纳入CCI®。侵入性空白诊断干预不应视为并发症:CDC和CCI®在RCT中的使用越来越多,这凸显了其标准化应用的重要性。目前就各种困难情况达成的共识可为一致使用 CDC 和 CCI® 提供新的指导,旨在改进并发症报告和更好的质量控制,最终使所有医疗利益相关者,首先是所有患者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
期刊最新文献
The Association Between Pediatric Readiness and Mortality for Injured Children Treated at US Trauma Centers. The Role of Adjuvant Therapy in Duodenal Adenocarcinoma and Intestinal Subtype Ampullary Carcinoma After Curative Resection. Association of Prophylactic Antibiotics With Early Infectious Complications in Children With Cancer Undergoing Central Venous Access Device Placement. Cure Probabilities After Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of 2554 Patients. Pancreatic Cancer: An Exocrine Tumor With Endocrine Characteristics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1