{"title":"Bone conducted cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: comparison of tone burst stimulus vs chirp stimulus.","authors":"Ceren Karaçaylı, Ercan Karababa, Bülent Satar","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-08886-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) is a test used to evaluate the function of otolith organs. In healthy individuals, air-conducted (AC) responses are obtained, whereas, in conductive hearing loss, the inability to transmit the signal well enough with AC stimuli has led to the need for bone-conducted (BC) stimuli. This study aimed to compare 500 Hz Chirp and Tone Burst stimuli in terms of latency and amplitude in BC cVEMP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational case control study included 35 healthy participants (70 ears) between the age of 20-50. Participants underwent VEMP testing with BC 500 Hz Tone Burst stimulus and 500 Hz narrow band Chirp stimulus without changing the position of the bone conducted vibrator. The intensity of the stimuli was 50 dB nHL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rate of 500 Hz TB Stimulus was 51.4% and 95.7% in Chirp stimulus. It was observed that significantly more responses were obtained with Chirp stimulus than TB stimulus (p < 0.001). In terms of p1 latency, n1 latency, both latencies were significantly shorter in Chirp stimulus (p < 0.001). p1n1 amplitude was found significantly larger in Chirp stimulus (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to 500 Hz TB stimulus, 500 Hz Chirp stimulus results in a higher response rate, larger p1n1 amplitude, and shorter p1 and n1 latency. A higher response rate may provide a more accurate assessment of otolith organs, reducing false negatives due to signal transmission in patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"6391-6395"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11564278/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08886-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) is a test used to evaluate the function of otolith organs. In healthy individuals, air-conducted (AC) responses are obtained, whereas, in conductive hearing loss, the inability to transmit the signal well enough with AC stimuli has led to the need for bone-conducted (BC) stimuli. This study aimed to compare 500 Hz Chirp and Tone Burst stimuli in terms of latency and amplitude in BC cVEMP.
Methods: This prospective observational case control study included 35 healthy participants (70 ears) between the age of 20-50. Participants underwent VEMP testing with BC 500 Hz Tone Burst stimulus and 500 Hz narrow band Chirp stimulus without changing the position of the bone conducted vibrator. The intensity of the stimuli was 50 dB nHL.
Results: Response rate of 500 Hz TB Stimulus was 51.4% and 95.7% in Chirp stimulus. It was observed that significantly more responses were obtained with Chirp stimulus than TB stimulus (p < 0.001). In terms of p1 latency, n1 latency, both latencies were significantly shorter in Chirp stimulus (p < 0.001). p1n1 amplitude was found significantly larger in Chirp stimulus (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Compared to 500 Hz TB stimulus, 500 Hz Chirp stimulus results in a higher response rate, larger p1n1 amplitude, and shorter p1 and n1 latency. A higher response rate may provide a more accurate assessment of otolith organs, reducing false negatives due to signal transmission in patients.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of
European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board
Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery
"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level.
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.