[Study of the mucosal morphological difference of distal-extension of mandibular dentition defect impressions taken by intra-oral digital scanning and selective pressure impression technique].

Q4 Medicine 上海口腔医学 Pub Date : 2024-06-01
Zhi-Cheng Gong, Yan Peng, Qun Zhong, Xue-Ying Wu, Shuo-Bo Fang
{"title":"[Study of the mucosal morphological difference of distal-extension of mandibular dentition defect impressions taken by intra-oral digital scanning and selective pressure impression technique].","authors":"Zhi-Cheng Gong, Yan Peng, Qun Zhong, Xue-Ying Wu, Shuo-Bo Fang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the mucosal morphological difference in distal-extension area of mandibular dentition defect taken by intra-oral digital scanning and selective pressure impression techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen patients with Kennedy Class I and Class II dentition defect in lower jaw were included, including twenty-two distal-extensions. Intraoral digital scanning and functional impression technique were taken in each patients, respectively. Laboratory cast scanner was used to scan the plaster casts made from the selective pressure impression to obtain the three-dimensional data. All the data were stored in STL format. The 3D data collecting from intra-oral digital scanning and selective pressure impression from the same patient were compared by Geomagic Control 2014 software. Root mean square of 2.5mm diameter area was calculated in 5,10,15 mm from terminal tooth. Pearson's correlation test was used to analyze the correlation of the distance and morphological difference with SPSS 20.0 software package.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean mucosal morphological difference of jaw distal-extension edentulous area taken by intra-oral digital scanning and selective pressure impression techniques was (0.37±0.12) mm. There was positive correlation between distance from terminal tooth and mucosal morphological difference(P<0.05). Morphological differences in 5, 10, 15 mm from terminal tooth were (0.14±0.11) mm, (0.22±0.13) mm and (0.39±0.16) mm, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, there was positive correlation between the length of distal-extension edentulous area and mucosal morphological difference, while the kind of ridge defect and mucosal thickness may also affect the morphological difference quantity.</p>","PeriodicalId":21709,"journal":{"name":"上海口腔医学","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"上海口腔医学","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the mucosal morphological difference in distal-extension area of mandibular dentition defect taken by intra-oral digital scanning and selective pressure impression techniques.

Methods: Seventeen patients with Kennedy Class I and Class II dentition defect in lower jaw were included, including twenty-two distal-extensions. Intraoral digital scanning and functional impression technique were taken in each patients, respectively. Laboratory cast scanner was used to scan the plaster casts made from the selective pressure impression to obtain the three-dimensional data. All the data were stored in STL format. The 3D data collecting from intra-oral digital scanning and selective pressure impression from the same patient were compared by Geomagic Control 2014 software. Root mean square of 2.5mm diameter area was calculated in 5,10,15 mm from terminal tooth. Pearson's correlation test was used to analyze the correlation of the distance and morphological difference with SPSS 20.0 software package.

Results: Mean mucosal morphological difference of jaw distal-extension edentulous area taken by intra-oral digital scanning and selective pressure impression techniques was (0.37±0.12) mm. There was positive correlation between distance from terminal tooth and mucosal morphological difference(P<0.05). Morphological differences in 5, 10, 15 mm from terminal tooth were (0.14±0.11) mm, (0.22±0.13) mm and (0.39±0.16) mm, respectively.

Conclusions: In this study, there was positive correlation between the length of distal-extension edentulous area and mucosal morphological difference, while the kind of ridge defect and mucosal thickness may also affect the morphological difference quantity.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[口内数字扫描和选择性压力印模技术下颌牙缺损远端延伸印模粘膜形态差异研究]。
目的:比较口内数字扫描和选择性压力印模技术在下颌骨牙列缺损远端伸展区的粘膜形态差异:方法:纳入 17 例肯尼迪下颌Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类牙列缺损患者,包括 22 例远伸区患者。分别对每位患者进行口内数字扫描和功能性印模技术。使用实验室石膏扫描仪对选择性压力印模制作的石膏模型进行扫描,以获得三维数据。所有数据均以 STL 格式存储。通过 Geomagic Control 2014 软件对同一患者口内数字扫描和选择性压力印模采集的三维数据进行比较。计算了距末端牙齿 5、10、15 毫米处 2.5 毫米直径区域的均方根。用 SPSS 20.0 软件包进行皮尔逊相关检验,分析距离与形态差异的相关性:通过口内数字扫描和选择性压力印模技术测量的下颌远端伸展无牙颌区域的平均粘膜形态差异为(0.37±0.12)毫米。距终牙距离与粘膜形态差异呈正相关(P<0.05)。距离顶牙 5、10、15 mm 的形态差异分别为(0.14±0.11)mm、(0.22±0.13)mm 和(0.39±0.16)mm:本研究中,远端延伸缺牙区长度与粘膜形态差异呈正相关,牙脊缺损类型和粘膜厚度也可能影响形态差异量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
上海口腔医学
上海口腔医学 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5299
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[A correlation study between the occlusal cant and temporomandibular joint space in patients with mandibular lateral deviation]. [Application of small intestinal submucosa absorbable biofilm in the repair of alveolar bone defects]. [Clincopathological analysis of 171 patients with osteochondroma and malignant transformation in maxillofacial bone]. [Clinical anatomy of the free latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and its application in the restoration of giant defects of the head and neck]. [Clinical effect of MB-PDT assisted initial therapy on alveolar angle absorption of lower anterior teeth].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1