Revisiting Differences in Fourth-Year Orthopaedic Away Rotation Opportunities and Fees Among Allopathic and Osteopathic Medical Students.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2024-08-05 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00041
Anthony Modica, Adam Kazimierczak, Brandon J Klein, Peter B White, Adam D Bitterman, Randy M Cohn
{"title":"Revisiting Differences in Fourth-Year Orthopaedic Away Rotation Opportunities and Fees Among Allopathic and Osteopathic Medical Students.","authors":"Anthony Modica, Adam Kazimierczak, Brandon J Klein, Peter B White, Adam D Bitterman, Randy M Cohn","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fourth-year away rotations are an important modifiable variable proven to increase students' opportunities to match into orthopaedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in away rotation eligibility requirements and cost of rotation between allopathic and osteopathic students during the 2023 application cycle. Eligibility requirements and fees were then compared with the 2021 application cycle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed during the 2023 application cycle of all nonmilitary, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs (n = 194). Each program's website, affiliated school of medicine's website, visiting student application service portal, and Residency Explorer tool were searched for eligibility criteria, associated rotation fees, and other rotation requirements. Two-sample Z tests for proportions were utilized to compare differences in programs with differing requirements for students based on academic degree type. Data were compared statistically with previously reported data from the 2021 application cycle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2023, there were more programs that restricted osteopathic medical students from away rotations than programs that restricted allopathic medical students (12/194, 6.2% vs. 0/194, 0.0%; p < 0.001). All 12 programs were formerly ACGME-accredited before the integration into a single accreditation system. There was a decrease in the number of programs restricting osteopathic medical students from away rotations compared with the 2021 application cycle (18/194, 9.3% vs. 12/194, 6.2%; p = 0.254). Fees associated with away rotations ranged from $25 to $4,000 for both allopathic and osteopathic students. The number of programs that charged osteopathic medical students higher rotation fees than programs that charged allopathic students when compared with the 2021 application cycles decreased (1/194, 0.5% vs. 5/194, 2.6%; p = 0.049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While some programs continue to have away rotation eligibility requirements that prohibit osteopathic medical students from rotating, only one residency program currently charges osteopathic medical students a higher fee to rotate than allopathic medical students.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11296481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Fourth-year away rotations are an important modifiable variable proven to increase students' opportunities to match into orthopaedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in away rotation eligibility requirements and cost of rotation between allopathic and osteopathic students during the 2023 application cycle. Eligibility requirements and fees were then compared with the 2021 application cycle.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed during the 2023 application cycle of all nonmilitary, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs (n = 194). Each program's website, affiliated school of medicine's website, visiting student application service portal, and Residency Explorer tool were searched for eligibility criteria, associated rotation fees, and other rotation requirements. Two-sample Z tests for proportions were utilized to compare differences in programs with differing requirements for students based on academic degree type. Data were compared statistically with previously reported data from the 2021 application cycle.

Results: In 2023, there were more programs that restricted osteopathic medical students from away rotations than programs that restricted allopathic medical students (12/194, 6.2% vs. 0/194, 0.0%; p < 0.001). All 12 programs were formerly ACGME-accredited before the integration into a single accreditation system. There was a decrease in the number of programs restricting osteopathic medical students from away rotations compared with the 2021 application cycle (18/194, 9.3% vs. 12/194, 6.2%; p = 0.254). Fees associated with away rotations ranged from $25 to $4,000 for both allopathic and osteopathic students. The number of programs that charged osteopathic medical students higher rotation fees than programs that charged allopathic students when compared with the 2021 application cycles decreased (1/194, 0.5% vs. 5/194, 2.6%; p = 0.049).

Conclusions: While some programs continue to have away rotation eligibility requirements that prohibit osteopathic medical students from rotating, only one residency program currently charges osteopathic medical students a higher fee to rotate than allopathic medical students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视全科医学生和骨科医学生在四年级骨科实习机会和费用方面的差异。
导言:第四年的外出轮转是一个重要的可变因素,事实证明它能增加学生进入骨科外科的机会。本研究的目的是确定在 2023 年申请周期内,全科和骨科学生在外出轮转资格要求和轮转费用方面的差异。然后将资格要求和费用与 2021 年申请周期进行比较:在2023年申请周期内,对所有非军事的、经美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)认证的骨科外科住院医师培训项目(n = 194)进行了横断面研究。我们在每个项目的网站、附属医学院的网站、访问学生申请服务门户网站和住院医师资源管理工具上搜索了资格标准、相关轮转费用和其他轮转要求。利用比例的双样本 Z 检验来比较根据学位类型对学生提出不同要求的项目之间的差异。数据与之前报告的 2021 年申请周期的数据进行了统计比较:2023年,限制骨科医学生外出轮转的项目多于限制全科医学生外出轮转的项目(12/194,6.2% vs. 0/194,0.0%;P < 0.001)。在整合为单一认证体系之前,所有 12 个项目都曾获得 ACGME 认证。与2021年申请周期相比,限制骨科医学生外出轮转的项目数量有所减少(18/194,9.3% vs. 12/194,6.2%;p = 0.254)。全科和骨科学生外出轮转的相关费用从 25 美元到 4,000 美元不等。与2021年的申请周期相比,向骨科医学生收取的轮转费高于向全科医学生收取的轮转费的项目数量有所减少(1/194,0.5% vs. 5/194,2.6%;p = 0.049):结论:虽然一些项目仍有禁止骨科医学生轮转的轮转资格要求,但目前只有一个住院医师培训项目向骨科医学生收取的轮转费高于全科医学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Both-Bone Forearm Shaft Fractures Treated with Compression Plate Fixation in Adults: A Systematic Review on Adverse Events and Outcomes. Exploring the Performance of ChatGPT in an Orthopaedic Setting and Its Potential Use as an Educational Tool. Nonoperative Care Versus Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: An Application of a Health Economic Technique to Simulate Head-to-Head Comparisons. Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum Versus Needle Fasciotomy for Primary Metacarpophalangeal Dupuytren Contracture: Five-Year Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Reoperation Rate After Posterior Spinal Fusion Varies Significantly by Lenke Type.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1