Qualitative and quantitative return-to-sport test battery and second anterior cruciate ligament injury risk factors.

IF 3.9 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002000
Lauren Butler, Alexa Martinez, Mina Entessari, Gabriel Cardenas, Margaret Wright, Dai Sugimoto
{"title":"Qualitative and quantitative return-to-sport test battery and second anterior cruciate ligament injury risk factors.","authors":"Lauren Butler, Alexa Martinez, Mina Entessari, Gabriel Cardenas, Margaret Wright, Dai Sugimoto","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine risk factors for second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury following primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) using return-to-sport (RTS) tests consisting of qualitative and quantitative measures in young athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case-control study design was used, and a retrospective review of adolescent athletes after primary ACLR was performed. All athletes completed an RTS test consisting of qualitative and quantitative assessments and psychological assessments with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. Athlete demographics, surgical characteristics and sports participation were also examined. A binary logistic regression was performed to verify an independent association between risk factors and second ACL injury using adjusted OR (aORs), 95% CI and p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 72 eligible athletes, 12 (16.7%) suffered a second ACL injury. The mean Tegner activity level was 8.4+1.1, and the mean time from ACLR to RTS test completion was 10.4+2.9 months. One variable that showed the lowest p-value in the preliminary analysis was entered into the binary logistic regression model, which resulted in that qualitative assessment of knee valgus during the sidestep cut was associated with second ACL injury (aOR=4.64, 95% CI: 1.18 to 18.23, p=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Athletes who demonstrated excessive dynamic knee valgus on the involved limb during the sidestep cut were approximately 4.6 times more likely to suffer a second ACL injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11298729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective: To determine risk factors for second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury following primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) using return-to-sport (RTS) tests consisting of qualitative and quantitative measures in young athletes.

Methods: A case-control study design was used, and a retrospective review of adolescent athletes after primary ACLR was performed. All athletes completed an RTS test consisting of qualitative and quantitative assessments and psychological assessments with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. Athlete demographics, surgical characteristics and sports participation were also examined. A binary logistic regression was performed to verify an independent association between risk factors and second ACL injury using adjusted OR (aORs), 95% CI and p<0.05.

Results: In 72 eligible athletes, 12 (16.7%) suffered a second ACL injury. The mean Tegner activity level was 8.4+1.1, and the mean time from ACLR to RTS test completion was 10.4+2.9 months. One variable that showed the lowest p-value in the preliminary analysis was entered into the binary logistic regression model, which resulted in that qualitative assessment of knee valgus during the sidestep cut was associated with second ACL injury (aOR=4.64, 95% CI: 1.18 to 18.23, p=0.03).

Conclusion: Athletes who demonstrated excessive dynamic knee valgus on the involved limb during the sidestep cut were approximately 4.6 times more likely to suffer a second ACL injury.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定性和定量重返运动场测试电池和第二前十字韧带损伤风险因素。
摘要:目的:通过对青少年运动员进行由定性和定量测量组成的恢复运动(RTS)测试,确定初级前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)术后造成第二次前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤的风险因素:方法:采用病例对照研究设计,对青少年运动员进行前交叉韧带初次重建后的回顾性研究。所有运动员都完成了由定性和定量评估组成的 RTS 测试,并使用坦帕运动恐惧量表进行了心理评估。此外,还检查了运动员的人口统计学特征、手术特征和运动参与情况。采用二元逻辑回归法来验证风险因素与第二次前交叉韧带损伤之间的独立关联,采用的是调整后的OR(aORs)、95% CI和pResults:在 72 名符合条件的运动员中,有 12 人(16.7%)第二次前十字韧带受伤。平均泰格纳活动水平为 8.4+1.1,从十字韧带修复到完成 RTS 测试的平均时间为 10.4+2.9 个月。初步分析中显示出最低 p 值的一个变量被输入二元逻辑回归模型,结果是侧方切入时膝关节外翻的定性评估与第二次前交叉韧带损伤有关(aOR=4.64,95% CI:1.18 至 18.23,p=0.03):结论:在侧步切入过程中,受累肢体表现出过度动态膝内翻的运动员遭受第二次前十字韧带损伤的几率大约是前十字韧带损伤几率的 4.6 倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
106
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cardiac health in breast cancer (CHiB): protocol for a single-centre, randomised controlled trial. It's about timing: how density can benefit future research on the optimal dosage of acute physical exercise breaks in esports. 24-hour Movement Behaviour study-Lithuanian protocol: a comprehensive overview of behaviours and health outcomes in adolescents. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of therapeutic exercise versus myofascial trigger point therapy in the treatment of shoulder tendinopathies: a randomised controlled trial. Correction: Differences in the technical performance of heading between men and women football players during FIFA World Cup 2022 and FIFA Women's World Cup 2023 matches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1