Use of Standardized Nursing Terminologies to Capture Social Determinants of Health Data: An Integrative Review.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1097/CIN.0000000000001171
Jeanette M Olsen, Emma J Panasuk, Lily J Swenson, Marty Williams
{"title":"Use of Standardized Nursing Terminologies to Capture Social Determinants of Health Data: An Integrative Review.","authors":"Jeanette M Olsen, Emma J Panasuk, Lily J Swenson, Marty Williams","doi":"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Addressing social determinants of health in nursing care is important for improving health outcomes and reducing health inequities. Using standardized nursing terminologies to capture this information generates sharable data that can be used to achieve these goals and create new knowledge. The purpose of this integrative review was to examine use of standardized nursing terminologies for collecting social determinants of health data in nursing research and practice. The CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases were searched using the terms \"social determinants of health\" [and] \"nursing\" [and] \"standardized terminology\" or names for each of the 12 American Nurses Association-approved terminologies. Limiters included peer-reviewed and English language. After removal of duplicates, 120 articles were found and screened for relevance and quality using a three-step process. This yielded a final sample of seven articles. Article data were extracted and analyzed for themes. In all articles, retrospective, observational, or secondary analysis research designs were used to analyze previously collected data from large, deidentified datasets or research studies. The Omaha System was the only standardized nursing terminology represented in the sample. All operational definitions of social determinants of health included behavioral items. In most studies, a social determinants of health index score was calculated, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and visualization methods. Results reported across the articles were diverse; some themes were identified. This review revealed published literature on this topic is limited. More quality improvement and multisite studies that examine the use of standardized nursing terminologies by nurses to collect and use social determinants of health data are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50694,"journal":{"name":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"772-779"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Addressing social determinants of health in nursing care is important for improving health outcomes and reducing health inequities. Using standardized nursing terminologies to capture this information generates sharable data that can be used to achieve these goals and create new knowledge. The purpose of this integrative review was to examine use of standardized nursing terminologies for collecting social determinants of health data in nursing research and practice. The CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases were searched using the terms "social determinants of health" [and] "nursing" [and] "standardized terminology" or names for each of the 12 American Nurses Association-approved terminologies. Limiters included peer-reviewed and English language. After removal of duplicates, 120 articles were found and screened for relevance and quality using a three-step process. This yielded a final sample of seven articles. Article data were extracted and analyzed for themes. In all articles, retrospective, observational, or secondary analysis research designs were used to analyze previously collected data from large, deidentified datasets or research studies. The Omaha System was the only standardized nursing terminology represented in the sample. All operational definitions of social determinants of health included behavioral items. In most studies, a social determinants of health index score was calculated, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and visualization methods. Results reported across the articles were diverse; some themes were identified. This review revealed published literature on this topic is limited. More quality improvement and multisite studies that examine the use of standardized nursing terminologies by nurses to collect and use social determinants of health data are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用标准化护理术语获取健康的社会决定因素数据:综合评述。
在护理工作中处理健康的社会决定因素对于改善健康结果和减少健康不公平现象非常重要。使用标准化护理术语来捕捉这些信息可生成可共享的数据,用于实现这些目标并创造新的知识。本综合综述旨在研究标准化护理术语在护理研究和实践中用于收集健康社会决定因素数据的情况。我们使用 "健康的社会决定因素"[和]"护理"[和]"标准化术语 "或美国护士协会批准的 12 个术语的名称在 CINAHL、MEDLINE 和 Web of Science 数据库中进行了检索。限制条件包括同行评审和英语。在删除重复文章后,共找到 120 篇文章,并采用三步法对文章的相关性和质量进行筛选。最终筛选出 7 篇文章。对文章数据进行了提取和主题分析。所有文章都采用了回顾性、观察性或二次分析研究设计,以分析之前从大型、去标识化数据集或研究中收集的数据。奥马哈系统是样本中唯一的标准化护理术语。健康的社会决定因素的所有操作定义都包括行为项目。大多数研究都计算了健康的社会决定因素指数得分,并使用描述性统计和可视化方法对数据进行了分析。文章中报告的结果多种多样,但也确定了一些主题。本综述显示,有关该主题的已发表文献十分有限。需要进行更多的质量改进和多地点研究,检查护士使用标准化护理术语收集和使用健康社会决定因素数据的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing 工程技术-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 30 years, CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing has been at the interface of the science of information and the art of nursing, publishing articles on the latest developments in nursing informatics, research, education and administrative of health information technology. CIN connects you with colleagues as they share knowledge on implementation of electronic health records systems, design decision-support systems, incorporate evidence-based healthcare in practice, explore point-of-care computing in practice and education, and conceptually integrate nursing languages and standard data sets. Continuing education contact hours are available in every issue.
期刊最新文献
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study to Determine the Effect of Real-Time Videos With Smart Glass on the Performance of the Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. A Question Answering Chatbot for Gastric Cancer Patients After Curative Gastrectomy: Development and Evaluation of User Experience and Performance. Migrating Mobile Applications to the Web: Adult Crash Cart Training. Relationship Between Individual Innovativeness Levels and Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Among Nursing and Midwifery Students. The Content, Reliability, and Quality of Insulin Pen Injection Videos on YouTube as Patient Education Resource.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1