A new, adaptive, self-administered, and generalizable method used to measure visual acuity.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Optometry and Vision Science Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1097/OPX.0000000000002160
Jan Skerswetat, Jingyi He, Jay Bijesh Shah, Nicolas Aycardi, Michelle Freeman, Peter John Bex
{"title":"A new, adaptive, self-administered, and generalizable method used to measure visual acuity.","authors":"Jan Skerswetat, Jingyi He, Jay Bijesh Shah, Nicolas Aycardi, Michelle Freeman, Peter John Bex","doi":"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Angular Indication Measurement (AIM) is an adaptive, self-administered, and generalizable orientation-judgment method designed to interrogate visual functions. We introduce AIM Visual Acuity (VA) and show its features and outcome measures. Angular Indication Measurement VA's ability to detect defocus was comparable with that of an Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter chart and showed greater sensitivity to astigmatic blur.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This proof-of-concept study introduces Angular Indication Measurement and applies it to VA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, we compared the ability of AIM-VA and ETDRS to detect defocus and astigmatic blur in 22 normally sighted adults. Spherical and cylindrical lenses in the dominant eye induced blur. Second, we compared repeatability over two tests of AIM-VA and ETDRS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A repeated-measure analysis of variance showed a main effect for defocus blur and test. For the astigmatism experiment, an interaction between blur and orientation was found. Pairwise comparisons showed that AIM was more sensitive to astigmatic-induced VA loss than ETDRS. Bland-Altman plots showed small bias and no systematic learning effect for either test type and improved repeatability with more than two adaptive steps for AIM-VA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Angular Indication Measurement VA's ability to detect defocus was comparable with that of an ETDRS letter chart and showed greater sensitivity to induced astigmatic blur, and AIM-VA's repeatability is comparable with ETDRS when using two or more adaptive steps. Angular Indication Measurement's self-administered orientation judgment approach is generalizable to interrogate other visual functions, e.g., contrast, color, motion, and stereovision.</p>","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":"101 7","pages":"451-463"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323045/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significance: Angular Indication Measurement (AIM) is an adaptive, self-administered, and generalizable orientation-judgment method designed to interrogate visual functions. We introduce AIM Visual Acuity (VA) and show its features and outcome measures. Angular Indication Measurement VA's ability to detect defocus was comparable with that of an Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter chart and showed greater sensitivity to astigmatic blur.

Purpose: This proof-of-concept study introduces Angular Indication Measurement and applies it to VA.

Methods: First, we compared the ability of AIM-VA and ETDRS to detect defocus and astigmatic blur in 22 normally sighted adults. Spherical and cylindrical lenses in the dominant eye induced blur. Second, we compared repeatability over two tests of AIM-VA and ETDRS.

Results: A repeated-measure analysis of variance showed a main effect for defocus blur and test. For the astigmatism experiment, an interaction between blur and orientation was found. Pairwise comparisons showed that AIM was more sensitive to astigmatic-induced VA loss than ETDRS. Bland-Altman plots showed small bias and no systematic learning effect for either test type and improved repeatability with more than two adaptive steps for AIM-VA.

Conclusions: Angular Indication Measurement VA's ability to detect defocus was comparable with that of an ETDRS letter chart and showed greater sensitivity to induced astigmatic blur, and AIM-VA's repeatability is comparable with ETDRS when using two or more adaptive steps. Angular Indication Measurement's self-administered orientation judgment approach is generalizable to interrogate other visual functions, e.g., contrast, color, motion, and stereovision.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种用于测量视力的全新、自适应、自测和可推广的方法。
意义重大:角度指示测量法(AIM)是一种自适应、自测和可推广的方位判断方法,旨在检查视觉功能。我们介绍了 AIM 视力(VA),并展示了其特点和结果测量。Angular Indication Measurement VA 检测散焦的能力与糖尿病视网膜病变早期治疗研究(ETDRS)字母图相当,对散光模糊的敏感度更高。目的:这项概念验证研究介绍了 Angular Indication Measurement,并将其应用于 VA:首先,我们比较了 AIM-VA 和 ETDRS 检测 22 名视力正常成年人散焦和散光模糊的能力。主视眼的球面镜和圆柱镜都会引起模糊。其次,我们比较了 AIM-VA 和 ETDRS 两次测试的重复性:重复测量方差分析显示,散焦模糊和测试具有主效应。散光实验中,模糊和方向之间存在交互作用。配对比较显示,AIM 对散光引起的视力损失比 ETDRS 更敏感。Bland-Altman图显示,两种测试类型的偏差都很小,没有系统性的学习效应,AIM-VA的重复性在两个以上的自适应步骤中得到改善:角度指示测量 VA 检测散焦的能力与 ETDRS 字母图相当,对诱导散光模糊的敏感度更高,在使用两个或更多自适应步骤时,AIM-VA 的可重复性与 ETDRS 相当。Angular Indication Measurement 的自测方位判断方法可用于检测其他视觉功能,如对比度、颜色、运动和立体视觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Optometry and Vision Science
Optometry and Vision Science 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy comparison of repeated low-level red-light therapy and orthokeratology lenses for myopia control. Exploring cognitive overload in adults with visual impairment: The association between concentration and fatigue. A pilot study of the impact of repeated blink refrainment on ocular surface temperature and the interblink period. Case report: Acute macular neuroretinopathy post-COVID-19 infection. Extended release of ciprofloxacin from commercial silicone-hydrogel and conventional hydrogel contact lenses containing vitamin E diffusion barriers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1