Review and analysis of history and utilization of panretinal photocoagulation and ranibizumab after publication of protocol S.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Current Opinion in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1097/ICU.0000000000001076
Serena Shah, Brandon Chou, Marissa Patel, Arjun Watane, Lea Shah, Nicolas Yannuzzi, Jayanth Sridhar
{"title":"Review and analysis of history and utilization of panretinal photocoagulation and ranibizumab after publication of protocol S.","authors":"Serena Shah, Brandon Chou, Marissa Patel, Arjun Watane, Lea Shah, Nicolas Yannuzzi, Jayanth Sridhar","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>We describe the history, utilization, and series results of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) and ranibizumab and provide an analysis of PRP and ranibizumab usage before versus after the publication of the 2-year and 5-year results of the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) Protocol S trial.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Number of ranibizumabs performed began to increase and number of PRPs performed began to decrease in 2016. After publication of the 2-year results, there was significant negative trend in PRP services and significant positive trend in ranibizumab services (both P < 0.001). After publication of the 5-year results, there was significant negative trend in PRP services (P = 0.003). There were significant negative trends (all P < 0.001) in reimbursement factors for PRP from 2013 to 2020: average work RVU (wRVU), nonfacility physical expense RVU, facility PE RVU, malpractice RVU (MP RVU).</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Both PRP and ranibizumab have undergone numerous trials comparing their efficacy to other treatment options or no treatment at all. The publication of the 2-year results of Protocol S was associated with an increase in utilization of ranibizumab and decrease in utilization of PRP, with continued decrease after the publication of the 5-year results.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000001076","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: We describe the history, utilization, and series results of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) and ranibizumab and provide an analysis of PRP and ranibizumab usage before versus after the publication of the 2-year and 5-year results of the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) Protocol S trial.

Recent findings: Number of ranibizumabs performed began to increase and number of PRPs performed began to decrease in 2016. After publication of the 2-year results, there was significant negative trend in PRP services and significant positive trend in ranibizumab services (both P < 0.001). After publication of the 5-year results, there was significant negative trend in PRP services (P = 0.003). There were significant negative trends (all P < 0.001) in reimbursement factors for PRP from 2013 to 2020: average work RVU (wRVU), nonfacility physical expense RVU, facility PE RVU, malpractice RVU (MP RVU).

Summary: Both PRP and ranibizumab have undergone numerous trials comparing their efficacy to other treatment options or no treatment at all. The publication of the 2-year results of Protocol S was associated with an increase in utilization of ranibizumab and decrease in utilization of PRP, with continued decrease after the publication of the 5-year results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 S.方案公布后,对泛视网膜光凝术和雷尼珠单抗的历史和使用情况进行回顾和分析。
综述目的:我们描述了泛视网膜光凝(PRP)和雷尼珠单抗的历史、使用情况和系列结果,并对糖尿病视网膜病变临床研究网络(DRCR.net)S协议试验2年和5年结果公布前后的PRP和雷尼珠单抗使用情况进行了分析:2016年,雷尼布单抗的使用次数开始增加,PRP的使用次数开始减少。2 年结果公布后,PRP 服务呈显著的负趋势,而雷尼珠单抗服务呈显著的正趋势(均为 P 摘要:PRP 和雷尼珠单抗都经过了大量试验,比较了它们与其他治疗方案或根本不进行治疗的疗效。S 方案 2 年结果公布后,使用雷尼珠单抗的人数增加,使用 PRP 的人数减少,5 年结果公布后,使用 PRP 的人数继续减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Ophthalmology is an indispensable resource featuring key up-to-date and important advances in the field from around the world. With renowned guest editors for each section, every bimonthly issue of Current Opinion in Ophthalmology delivers a fresh insight into topics such as glaucoma, refractive surgery and corneal and external disorders. With ten sections in total, the journal provides a convenient and thorough review of the field and will be of interest to researchers, clinicians and other healthcare professionals alike.
期刊最新文献
Vision of the future: large language models in ophthalmology. The necessity and role of scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ocular manifestations of mpox. Treatment for dry age-related macular degeneration: where we stand in 2024. Criteria for premium intraocular lens patient selection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1