Evaluation of university and training standards in clinical perfusion, an European-wide survey.

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivae134
André Giesbrecht, Christian Klüß, Gerdy Debeuckelaere, Maria Angeles Bruño, Folker Wenzel, Matthias Kohl, Filip De Somer, Adrian Bauer
{"title":"Evaluation of university and training standards in clinical perfusion, an European-wide survey.","authors":"André Giesbrecht, Christian Klüß, Gerdy Debeuckelaere, Maria Angeles Bruño, Folker Wenzel, Matthias Kohl, Filip De Somer, Adrian Bauer","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivae134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Adequate theoretical and practical training of prospective clinical perfusionists is essential for maintaining clinical standards and ensuring patient safety during cardiac surgery procedures. Perfusion schools play a crucial role in establishing and maintaining higher education and training standards in clinical perfusion. The aim of this study is to obtain a comprehensive overview of European training standards in clinical perfusion in 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this study, 53 perfusion schools in Europe were found and contacted, of which 30 (56.6%) responded, giving a sample size of n = 30, which were then included in the data analysis. The quantitative data of the survey are analysed using descriptive methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The university and training standards in clinical perfusion in Europe vary in many respects. Starting with the entry criterion for studies (most frequently a required bachelor's degree 36.7% or 2nd most common an university entrance qualification 30%), the duration [from <12 months (13.3%) up to 36 months (13.3%)] and regarding the content of the teaching in clinical perfusion [<30 European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) (33.3%) and more than 180 ECTS (6.7%)]. The mean value for teaching in clinical perfusion content is 62.63 ECTS credits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The obtained results show important differences between countries and schools. As such, they form a valuable database for future discussions establishing a common European curriculum and training standards for perfusionists. For the generalizability of the results, further evaluations and larger samples are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11335367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Adequate theoretical and practical training of prospective clinical perfusionists is essential for maintaining clinical standards and ensuring patient safety during cardiac surgery procedures. Perfusion schools play a crucial role in establishing and maintaining higher education and training standards in clinical perfusion. The aim of this study is to obtain a comprehensive overview of European training standards in clinical perfusion in 2023.

Methods: For this study, 53 perfusion schools in Europe were found and contacted, of which 30 (56.6%) responded, giving a sample size of n = 30, which were then included in the data analysis. The quantitative data of the survey are analysed using descriptive methods.

Results: The university and training standards in clinical perfusion in Europe vary in many respects. Starting with the entry criterion for studies (most frequently a required bachelor's degree 36.7% or 2nd most common an university entrance qualification 30%), the duration [from <12 months (13.3%) up to 36 months (13.3%)] and regarding the content of the teaching in clinical perfusion [<30 European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) (33.3%) and more than 180 ECTS (6.7%)]. The mean value for teaching in clinical perfusion content is 62.63 ECTS credits.

Conclusions: The obtained results show important differences between countries and schools. As such, they form a valuable database for future discussions establishing a common European curriculum and training standards for perfusionists. For the generalizability of the results, further evaluations and larger samples are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全欧洲临床灌注大学和培训标准评估调查。
目的:对未来的临床灌注医师进行充分的理论和实践培训,对于维持临床标准和确保心脏手术过程中的患者安全至关重要。灌注学校在建立和维持临床灌注的高等教育和培训标准方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本研究旨在全面了解 2023 年欧洲临床灌注培训标准:在这项研究中,我们找到并联系了欧洲 53 所灌注学校,其中 30 所(56.6%)做出了回应,样本量为 n = 30,然后将其纳入数据分析。调查的定量数据采用描述性方法进行分析:欧洲临床灌注专业的大学和培训标准在很多方面都存在差异。从入学标准(最常见的是学士学位,占 36.7%;其次是大学入学资格,占 30%)、学制(从少于 12 个月(13.3%)到 36 个月(13.3%))以及临床灌注教学内容(少于 30 个 ECTS(33.3%)和超过 180 个 ECTS(6.7%))开始。临床灌注教学内容的平均值为 62.63 ECTS 学分:所获得的结果显示了不同国家和学校之间的重要差异。因此,它们为今后讨论建立欧洲共同课程和灌注师培训标准提供了一个宝贵的数据库。为了使结果具有普遍性,还需要进一步的评估和更大的样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Return to work after parenting in thoracic surgery: a call to action. Value of observational studies in the outcome evaluation of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement. Prosthesis selection for reconstruction of superior vena cava: comparison of midterm patency rates. Prophylactic ablation during cardiac surgery in patients without atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. A case of superior trunk brachial plexus injury after right mini-thoracotomy mitral valve repair.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1