Engaging in literature review, synthesis, and meta-analysis: A few considerations for family scholars

IF 3.2 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Family Theory & Review Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1111/jftr.12581
Todd M. Jensen
{"title":"Engaging in literature review, synthesis, and meta-analysis: A few considerations for family scholars","authors":"Todd M. Jensen","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Given their value, literature reviews and syntheses are featured in numerous family-centered academic journals, including the flagship journals of the National Council on Family Relations. Although literature reviews and syntheses, including meta-analyses, have been published in family-centered academic journals for decades, the application of these methods to topics germane to family science has increased substantially over time. This trend—coupled with a desire to support the conduct of high-quality literature reviews and syntheses in family science—prompted the development of this article, which aims to provide an efficient, didactic overview of common literature review and synthesis approaches, including meta-analysis. This article also offers several considerations intended to support family scholars' efforts to develop strong literature reviews, syntheses, and meta-analyses, particularly ones intended for publication in family-centered academic journals. The skillful application of these methods will support family scholars' continued efforts to enrich, guide, and advance family science.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jftr.12581","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given their value, literature reviews and syntheses are featured in numerous family-centered academic journals, including the flagship journals of the National Council on Family Relations. Although literature reviews and syntheses, including meta-analyses, have been published in family-centered academic journals for decades, the application of these methods to topics germane to family science has increased substantially over time. This trend—coupled with a desire to support the conduct of high-quality literature reviews and syntheses in family science—prompted the development of this article, which aims to provide an efficient, didactic overview of common literature review and synthesis approaches, including meta-analysis. This article also offers several considerations intended to support family scholars' efforts to develop strong literature reviews, syntheses, and meta-analyses, particularly ones intended for publication in family-centered academic journals. The skillful application of these methods will support family scholars' continued efforts to enrich, guide, and advance family science.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与文献回顾、综合和荟萃分析:家庭学者的几点考虑
鉴于文献综述的价值,许多以家庭为中心的学术期刊,包括全国家庭关系委员会的旗舰期刊,都会刊登文献综述。尽管以家庭为中心的学术期刊发表文献综述(包括荟萃分析)已有几十年的历史,但随着时间的推移,这些方法在与家庭科学相关的主题上的应用已大幅增加。这种趋势--加上支持在家庭科学中进行高质量文献综述和综合的愿望--促使了本文的产生,本文旨在对常见的文献综述和综合方法(包括荟萃分析)提供一个高效的、说教式的概述。本文还提供了一些注意事项,旨在支持家庭学者努力撰写有说服力的文献综述、综述和荟萃分析,尤其是打算在以家庭为中心的学术期刊上发表的文献综述、综述和荟萃分析。熟练应用这些方法将支持家庭学者继续努力丰富、指导和推进家庭科学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Intergenerational coparenting and child development outcomes: A systematic review Parent–child discrepancies in mate preferences: A three‐level meta‐analysis Don't skip class: A new conceptual model for examining classism among adolescents and families Bringing birth fathers to the forefront: A two‐decade scoping review of birth father experiences in adoption Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1