Comparison of Effectiveness of Lignocaine and Lignocaine with Pre-Operative Oral Ibuprofen for Pulpectomy in 5 to 9-Year-Old Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Endodontic Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.14744/eej.2023.18480
Zeel Gandhi, Subhadra Hn
{"title":"Comparison of Effectiveness of Lignocaine and Lignocaine with Pre-Operative Oral Ibuprofen for Pulpectomy in 5 to 9-Year-Old Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Zeel Gandhi, Subhadra Hn","doi":"10.14744/eej.2023.18480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Childhood experiences of pain associated with dental treatment can induce dental anxiety. Inferior alveolar nerve blocks are eight times more likely to fail in patients with irreversible pulpitis.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective was to compare the effectiveness of lignocaine and lignocaine with pre-operative oral ibuprofen for pulpectomy in 5 to 9-year-old children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and twenty-two children requiring pulpectomy in mandibular posterior teeth were included. The children were assigned to one of the two groups, Treatment group A: Pre-operative with oral ibuprofen and local anaesthesia with 2% lignocaine (with adrenaline 1: 80000); Treatment group B: Pre-operative with oral placebo and local anaesthesia with 2% lignocaine (with 1: 80000 adrenaline). Pain and pulse rate were recorded at baseline, one hour after administration of oral medication, fifteen minutes following administration of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block (IANB), and also during the course pulpectomy. The results were statistically analysed using chi square test and repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) Results: In treatment group A, 90.16% children had IANB success. In treatment group B, 9.83% had IANB success. The difference in the success rate between two groups was statistically significant (p<0.001) with an odds ratio of 84.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oral medication with ibuprofen is effective in increasing the success rate of IANB with lignocaine for the treatment of irreversible pulpitis of 5 to 9-year-old children. (EEJ-2023-09-122).</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2023.18480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Childhood experiences of pain associated with dental treatment can induce dental anxiety. Inferior alveolar nerve blocks are eight times more likely to fail in patients with irreversible pulpitis.

Purpose: The objective was to compare the effectiveness of lignocaine and lignocaine with pre-operative oral ibuprofen for pulpectomy in 5 to 9-year-old children.

Methods: One hundred and twenty-two children requiring pulpectomy in mandibular posterior teeth were included. The children were assigned to one of the two groups, Treatment group A: Pre-operative with oral ibuprofen and local anaesthesia with 2% lignocaine (with adrenaline 1: 80000); Treatment group B: Pre-operative with oral placebo and local anaesthesia with 2% lignocaine (with 1: 80000 adrenaline). Pain and pulse rate were recorded at baseline, one hour after administration of oral medication, fifteen minutes following administration of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block (IANB), and also during the course pulpectomy. The results were statistically analysed using chi square test and repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) Results: In treatment group A, 90.16% children had IANB success. In treatment group B, 9.83% had IANB success. The difference in the success rate between two groups was statistically significant (p<0.001) with an odds ratio of 84.

Conclusion: Oral medication with ibuprofen is effective in increasing the success rate of IANB with lignocaine for the treatment of irreversible pulpitis of 5 to 9-year-old children. (EEJ-2023-09-122).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 5-9 岁儿童肺部切除术中使用木质素卡因和木质素卡因与术前口服布洛芬的效果比较:随机对照试验。
简介儿童时期与牙科治疗相关的疼痛经历会诱发牙科焦虑。目的:本研究旨在比较木质素卡因和木质素卡因与术前口服布洛芬对5至9岁儿童进行牙槽切除术的效果:纳入了122名需要进行下颌后牙脉冲切除术的儿童。这些儿童被分配到两组中的一组,即治疗组 A:治疗 A 组:术前口服布洛芬,并用 2% 的木质素(肾上腺素 1:80000)进行局部麻醉;治疗 B 组:术前口服安慰剂,并用 2% 的木质素(肾上腺素 1:80000)进行局部麻醉。在基线、口服药物一小时后、下齿槽神经阻滞(IANB)15 分钟后以及脉冲切除术过程中记录疼痛和脉搏。结果采用卡方检验和重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)进行统计分析:在治疗组 A 中,90.16% 的儿童 IANB 成功。在治疗 B 组中,9.83% 的儿童获得了 IANB 成功。两组的成功率差异有统计学意义(p 结论:布洛芬口服药物能有效提高木质素注射液治疗5至9岁儿童不可逆牙髓炎的成功率。(EEJ-2023-09-122)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Effect of Final Irrigation Solutions on Mechanical Properties of Root Canal Dentine Running title: Final Irrigation on Mechanical Properties. Calcium silicate-based intracanal medication: Physicochemical properties and effectiveness of techniques for removing medication from the human root canal. Increasing the Apical Sizes of Root Enlarged for Root Canal Obturation Influences the Outcome of Single-Root-Canal Teeth Affected by Apical Periodontitis. Regenerative Treatment of Mature Teeth with Pulp Necrosis and Apical Periodontitis Using Biodentine Compared with MTA: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Controversial terminology in root and canal anatomy: A comprehensive review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1