Identifying implementation-oriented models of urban underground space development in China based on fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1016/j.tust.2024.106007
{"title":"Identifying implementation-oriented models of urban underground space development in China based on fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2024.106007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The rapid expansion of urban underground space (UUS) has become increasingly popular in densely populated urban areas worldwide. Although data-driven technology has facilitated the planning process successfully, the implementation mechanism of UUS planning remains obscure, potentially undermining the spatial performance. To address this gap, this study employs fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to analyze the causality of UUS development. Three primary models of UUS development-separate, interconnected, and integrated models-are categorized. Causal conditions and outcomes along with their quantitative metrics are proposed. Subsequently, 30 Chinese cases are analyzed using fsQCA to assess the necessity and sufficiency of UUS development. Three distinct causal paths are identified, namely strong economic strength, robust policy support, and advanced construction technology, which play critical roles in integrated development, while weak economic strength and inadequate policy support lead to separate development. The study underscores the importance of implementing UUS development models and provides valuable insights for UUS planning management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779824004255","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid expansion of urban underground space (UUS) has become increasingly popular in densely populated urban areas worldwide. Although data-driven technology has facilitated the planning process successfully, the implementation mechanism of UUS planning remains obscure, potentially undermining the spatial performance. To address this gap, this study employs fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to analyze the causality of UUS development. Three primary models of UUS development-separate, interconnected, and integrated models-are categorized. Causal conditions and outcomes along with their quantitative metrics are proposed. Subsequently, 30 Chinese cases are analyzed using fsQCA to assess the necessity and sufficiency of UUS development. Three distinct causal paths are identified, namely strong economic strength, robust policy support, and advanced construction technology, which play critical roles in integrated development, while weak economic strength and inadequate policy support lead to separate development. The study underscores the importance of implementing UUS development models and provides valuable insights for UUS planning management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)确定中国城市地下空间开发的实施导向模式
在全球人口稠密的城市地区,城市地下空间(UUS)的快速扩张越来越受欢迎。尽管数据驱动技术成功地推动了规划进程,但地下空间规划的实施机制仍然模糊不清,可能会影响空间绩效。针对这一缺陷,本研究采用模糊集定性比较分析法(fsQCA)来分析 UUS 发展的因果关系。UUS 发展的三种主要模式--分离模式、互联模式和综合模式--被归类。提出了因果条件和结果及其量化指标。随后,使用 fsQCA 分析了 30 个中国案例,以评估 UUS 开发的必要性和充分性。研究发现了三条不同的因果路径,即强大的经济实力、有力的政策支持和先进的建筑技术,它们在综合发展中发挥了关键作用,而薄弱的经济实力和不足的政策支持则导致了各自为政的发展。该研究强调了实施统一城市系统发展模式的重要性,并为统一城市系统的规划管理提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
期刊最新文献
Construction risk probability assessment of shield tunneling projects in karst areas based on improved two-dimensional cloud model Stresses induced in a buried corrugated metal arch culvert due to backfilling compaction efforts Cyclic seismic pushover testing of a multi-story underground station Quantitative interrelations of conditioning and recycling indices of high-saturation clay soils for EPB shield tunnelling Laboratory investigation of rock pillar reinforcement against impact loading by using high-tensile-strength polyurea with different coating thicknesses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1