Assessment of Missing Data on Glaucoma Severity Among Participants in the NIH All of Us Research Program of the United States.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Glaucoma Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002480
Kaela N Acuff, Bharanidharan Radha Saseendrakumar, Robert N Weinreb, Sally L Baxter
{"title":"Assessment of Missing Data on Glaucoma Severity Among Participants in the NIH All of Us Research Program of the United States.","authors":"Kaela N Acuff, Bharanidharan Radha Saseendrakumar, Robert N Weinreb, Sally L Baxter","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>There were statistically significant differences across multiple socioeconomic characteristics and self-reported barriers to care among primary glaucoma patients with severity staging data versus those missing this data in the NIH All of Us database.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize missing data among glaucoma patients within All of Us .</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We used diagnosis codes to define cohorts of primary glaucoma patients with and without severity staging specified. Descriptive analyses were conducted by presence of disease severity stage. Analysis of missing data was conducted using a set intersection plot and the Little Test of Missing Completely at Random. T tests were performed to evaluate differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2982 participants, 1714 (57%) did not have glaucoma severity stage specified, and 11 of 23 analyzed variables had missing data. The Little Test indicated data was not missing completely at random ( P <0.001). Significant differences existed between the 2 cohorts with respect to age, age of first glaucoma diagnosis, gender, ethnicity, education, income, insurance, history of glaucoma surgery and medication use, and answers regarding the ability to afford eyeglasses and having seen an eye care provider in the last 12 months (all P- values ≤0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were significant differences between glaucoma participants with glaucoma severity stage specified versus those with unstaged disease across multiple socioeconomic characteristics and self-reported barriers to care. Glaucoma severity staging data was not missing completely at random. The unstaged cohort included higher rates of multiple underrepresented communities, which may potentially contribute to bias in ophthalmology research as participants from vulnerable populations may be disproportionately excluded from electronic health records or claims data studies where diagnosis codes with severity/staging levels are used to examine risk factors for disease, progression, and treatment efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":"39-46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002480","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prcis: There were statistically significant differences across multiple socioeconomic characteristics and self-reported barriers to care among primary glaucoma patients with severity staging data versus those missing this data in the NIH All of Us database.

Purpose: To characterize missing data among glaucoma patients within All of Us .

Materials and methods: We used diagnosis codes to define cohorts of primary glaucoma patients with and without severity staging specified. Descriptive analyses were conducted by presence of disease severity stage. Analysis of missing data was conducted using a set intersection plot and the Little Test of Missing Completely at Random. T tests were performed to evaluate differences.

Results: Of 2982 participants, 1714 (57%) did not have glaucoma severity stage specified, and 11 of 23 analyzed variables had missing data. The Little Test indicated data was not missing completely at random ( P <0.001). Significant differences existed between the 2 cohorts with respect to age, age of first glaucoma diagnosis, gender, ethnicity, education, income, insurance, history of glaucoma surgery and medication use, and answers regarding the ability to afford eyeglasses and having seen an eye care provider in the last 12 months (all P- values ≤0.01).

Conclusion: There were significant differences between glaucoma participants with glaucoma severity stage specified versus those with unstaged disease across multiple socioeconomic characteristics and self-reported barriers to care. Glaucoma severity staging data was not missing completely at random. The unstaged cohort included higher rates of multiple underrepresented communities, which may potentially contribute to bias in ophthalmology research as participants from vulnerable populations may be disproportionately excluded from electronic health records or claims data studies where diagnosis codes with severity/staging levels are used to examine risk factors for disease, progression, and treatment efficacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国国立卫生研究院 "我们所有人 "研究计划参与者青光眼严重程度缺失数据评估。
摘要:在美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)All of Us数据库中,有严重程度分期数据的原发性青光眼患者与缺失该数据的患者在多种社会经济特征和自我报告的护理障碍方面存在统计学意义上的显著差异:我们使用诊断代码定义了有严重程度分期数据和无严重程度分期数据的原发性青光眼患者群组。根据是否存在疾病严重程度分期进行描述性分析。使用集合交集图和利特尔随机完全缺失检验对缺失数据进行分析。对差异进行 T 检验:在 2982 名参与者中,有 1714 人(57%)没有说明青光眼严重程度分期,23 个分析变量中有 11 个数据缺失。利特尔检验表明,数据并非完全随机缺失:已明确青光眼严重程度分期的青光眼患者与未分期的青光眼患者在多种社会经济特征和自我报告的就医障碍方面存在明显差异。青光眼严重程度分期数据并非完全随机缺失。未分期队列中多个代表性不足群体的比例较高,这可能会造成眼科研究中的偏差,因为弱势人群的参与者可能会被过多地排除在电子健康记录或索赔数据研究之外,而这些研究使用带有严重程度/分期水平的诊断代码来检查疾病的风险因素、病情发展和治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
期刊最新文献
Association of Social Determinants of Health With the Likelihood of Treatment With Laser Trabeculoplasty in a US Database. Neighborhood Poverty and Clinic Attendance in the Michigan Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and Eye Health Through Telemedicine Program. Wipe-Out Following Gonioscopy-Assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy Combined With Phacoemulsification. Assessment of Missing Data on Glaucoma Severity Among Participants in the NIH All of Us Research Program of the United States. Compliance With International Council of Ophthalmology Guidelines for Glaucoma Eye Care in Pakistan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1