Awake Early Manual Reduction Is Highly Effective for Subaxial Cervical Spine Dislocation.

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY Spine Surgery and Related Research Pub Date : 2023-12-27 eCollection Date: 2024-07-27 DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2023-0229
Takuya Taoka, Tomoyuki Takigawa, Takuya Morita, Genta Fukumoto, Yukihisa Yagata, Keitarou Tada, Takahiko Ishimaru, Takeshi Ishihara, Yasuo Ito
{"title":"Awake Early Manual Reduction Is Highly Effective for Subaxial Cervical Spine Dislocation.","authors":"Takuya Taoka, Tomoyuki Takigawa, Takuya Morita, Genta Fukumoto, Yukihisa Yagata, Keitarou Tada, Takahiko Ishimaru, Takeshi Ishihara, Yasuo Ito","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2023-0229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Guidelines published in 2013 recommend early closed reduction for cervical spine dislocation. There are two types of closed reduction: manual reduction and traction. Manual reduction can be performed early. In addition, it can correct rotation and requires a short time for complete reduction. We perform manual reduction for cervical spine dislocation. This study aimed to evaluate early manual reduction's success rate and safety for cervical dislocation. We also examined the relationship between time to reduction and improvement in paralysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 361 patients with cervical spine injuries treated at our hospital between July 2010 and December 2021. We assigned patients to the early group if the time from injury to reduction was ≤6 hours and to the late group if >6 hours. We performed awake manual reduction on the patients. Furthermore, we compared reduction's success rate and safety, including neurological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 46 patients were included in the study: 31 and 15 in the early and late groups, respectively. The success rate of reduction was 93%, and no neurological complications from reduction were observed. The neurological outcomes and reduction success rates were significantly superior in the early group than in the late group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neurological outcomes were significantly superior when reduction was performed within 6 hours than after 6 hours. Manual reduction can be performed early, safely, and easily. It is effective for cervical spine dislocation requiring early reduction for an excellent neurologic prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":"8 4","pages":"383-390"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2023-0229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Guidelines published in 2013 recommend early closed reduction for cervical spine dislocation. There are two types of closed reduction: manual reduction and traction. Manual reduction can be performed early. In addition, it can correct rotation and requires a short time for complete reduction. We perform manual reduction for cervical spine dislocation. This study aimed to evaluate early manual reduction's success rate and safety for cervical dislocation. We also examined the relationship between time to reduction and improvement in paralysis.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 361 patients with cervical spine injuries treated at our hospital between July 2010 and December 2021. We assigned patients to the early group if the time from injury to reduction was ≤6 hours and to the late group if >6 hours. We performed awake manual reduction on the patients. Furthermore, we compared reduction's success rate and safety, including neurological outcomes.

Results: Overall, 46 patients were included in the study: 31 and 15 in the early and late groups, respectively. The success rate of reduction was 93%, and no neurological complications from reduction were observed. The neurological outcomes and reduction success rates were significantly superior in the early group than in the late group.

Conclusions: Neurological outcomes were significantly superior when reduction was performed within 6 hours than after 6 hours. Manual reduction can be performed early, safely, and easily. It is effective for cervical spine dislocation requiring early reduction for an excellent neurologic prognosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈椎轴下脱位的清醒早期手法复位疗效显著
导言:2013 年发布的指南建议尽早对颈椎脱位进行闭合复位。闭合复位有两种类型:人工复位和牵引。手法复位可在早期进行。此外,它还能纠正旋转,并且只需很短的时间就能完全复位。我们对颈椎脱位实施手法复位。本研究旨在评估早期手法复位治疗颈椎脱位的成功率和安全性。我们还研究了复位时间与瘫痪改善之间的关系:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了 2010 年 7 月至 2021 年 12 月期间在我院接受治疗的 361 名颈椎损伤患者。如果从受伤到复位的时间≤6小时,我们将患者归入早期组;如果超过6小时,我们将患者归入晚期组。我们对患者进行了清醒状态下的人工复位。此外,我们还比较了还原术的成功率和安全性,包括神经系统结果:研究共纳入 46 名患者:结果:总共有 46 名患者参与了研究:早期组和晚期组分别有 31 名和 15 名患者。缩窄术的成功率为 93%,没有观察到缩窄术引起的神经系统并发症。早期组的神经功能预后和缩窄成功率明显优于晚期组:结论:在 6 小时内进行手法复位,神经功能结果明显优于 6 小时后。手法复位可以早期、安全、简便地进行。对于需要尽早复位以获得良好神经预后的颈椎脱位患者来说,这是一种有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Case of Early Onset Scoliosis with Trisomy 1q and Monosomy 21q. Artificial Intelligence Classification for Detecting and Grading Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration. A Case of Desmoplastic Fibroma of the Thoracic Spine with Incomplete Paralysis of both Lower Limbs. Transcostal Microendoscopic Discectomy for Central Thoracic Disc Herniation Causing Myelopathy: A Technical Note. Posterior Column Reconstruction of the Lumbar Spine Using En Bloc Resected Vertebral Arch in Spinal Tumor and Deformity Surgeries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1