Treatment accuracy of standard linear accelerator-based prostate SBRT: the delivered dose assessment of patients treated within two major clinical trials using an in-house position monitoring system

Sankar Arumugam, T. Young, Catherine Jones, David Pryor, M. Sidhom
{"title":"Treatment accuracy of standard linear accelerator-based prostate SBRT: the delivered dose assessment of patients treated within two major clinical trials using an in-house position monitoring system","authors":"Sankar Arumugam, T. Young, Catherine Jones, David Pryor, M. Sidhom","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2024.1372968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to assess the dosimetric improvements achieved in prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment within the PROMETHEUS and NINJA trials using an in-house real-time position monitoring system, SeedTracker.This study considered a total of 127 prostate SBRT patients treated in the PROMETHEUS (ACTRN12615000223538) and NINJA (ACTRN12618001806257) clinical trials. The SeedTracker position monitoring system was utilized for real-time position monitoring with a 3-mm position tolerance. The doses delivered to the clinical target volume (CTV), rectum, and bladder were assessed by incorporating the actual target position during treatment. The dose that would have been delivered without monitoring was also assessed by incorporating the observed position deviations.Treatment with position corrections resulted in a mean (range) CTV D99 difference of −0.3 (−1.0 to 0.0) Gy between the planned and delivered dose. Without corrections, this difference would have been −0.6 (−3.7 to 0.0) Gy. Not correcting for position deviations resulted in a statistically significant difference between the planned and delivered CTV D99 (p < 0.05). The mean (range) dose difference between the planned and delivered D2cc of the rectum and bladder for treatment with position corrections was −0.1 (−3.7 to 4.7) Gy and −0.1 (−1.7 to 0.5) Gy, respectively. Without corrections, these differences would have been −0.6 (−6.1 to 4.7) Gy and −0.2 (−2.5 to 0.9) Gy.SeedTracker improved clinical dose volume compliance in prostate SBRT. Without monitoring and corrections, delivered dose would significantly differ from the planned dose.","PeriodicalId":507440,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"84 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1372968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the dosimetric improvements achieved in prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment within the PROMETHEUS and NINJA trials using an in-house real-time position monitoring system, SeedTracker.This study considered a total of 127 prostate SBRT patients treated in the PROMETHEUS (ACTRN12615000223538) and NINJA (ACTRN12618001806257) clinical trials. The SeedTracker position monitoring system was utilized for real-time position monitoring with a 3-mm position tolerance. The doses delivered to the clinical target volume (CTV), rectum, and bladder were assessed by incorporating the actual target position during treatment. The dose that would have been delivered without monitoring was also assessed by incorporating the observed position deviations.Treatment with position corrections resulted in a mean (range) CTV D99 difference of −0.3 (−1.0 to 0.0) Gy between the planned and delivered dose. Without corrections, this difference would have been −0.6 (−3.7 to 0.0) Gy. Not correcting for position deviations resulted in a statistically significant difference between the planned and delivered CTV D99 (p < 0.05). The mean (range) dose difference between the planned and delivered D2cc of the rectum and bladder for treatment with position corrections was −0.1 (−3.7 to 4.7) Gy and −0.1 (−1.7 to 0.5) Gy, respectively. Without corrections, these differences would have been −0.6 (−6.1 to 4.7) Gy and −0.2 (−2.5 to 0.9) Gy.SeedTracker improved clinical dose volume compliance in prostate SBRT. Without monitoring and corrections, delivered dose would significantly differ from the planned dose.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于标准直线加速器的前列腺 SBRT 的治疗精确度:使用内部位置监测系统对两项主要临床试验中接受治疗的患者进行剂量评估
本研究的目的是评估在 PROMETHEUS 和 NINJA 试验中使用内部实时位置监测系统 SeedTracker 对前列腺立体定向体放射治疗 (SBRT) 所取得的剂量学改进。本研究考虑了在 PROMETHEUS (ACTRN12615000223538) 和 NINJA (ACTRN12618001806257) 临床试验中接受治疗的 127 例前列腺 SBRT 患者。SeedTracker 位置监测系统用于实时位置监测,位置误差为 3 毫米。通过结合治疗过程中的实际靶点位置,对临床靶体积(CTV)、直肠和膀胱的剂量进行了评估。在进行位置校正治疗后,计划剂量和实际剂量之间的 CTV D99 平均值(范围)差异为 -0.3(-1.0 至 0.0)Gy。如果不进行校正,这一差异将为-0.6(-3.7 至 0.0)Gy。如果不对位置偏差进行校正,则计划的 CTV D99 剂量与投放的 CTV D99 剂量之间的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。位置校正后,直肠和膀胱的计划 D2cc 剂量与交付 D2cc 剂量之间的平均(范围)差异分别为-0.1(-3.7 至 4.7)Gy 和-0.1(-1.7 至 0.5)Gy。如果没有校正,这些差异将分别为-0.6(-6.1 到 4.7)Gy 和-0.2(-2.5 到 0.9)Gy。如果不进行监测和校正,投放剂量将与计划剂量相差甚远。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical experience with adaptive MRI-guided pancreatic SBRT and the use of abdominal compression to reduce treatment volume Frequency of pathogenic germline variants in pediatric medulloblastoma survivors Long segment ureterectomy with tapered demucosalized ileum replacement of ureter for ureteral cancer: a case report and literature review Application of λ esophagojejunostomy in total gastrectomy under laparoscopy: a modified technique for post-gastrectomy reconstruction Treatment accuracy of standard linear accelerator-based prostate SBRT: the delivered dose assessment of patients treated within two major clinical trials using an in-house position monitoring system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1