Capitalism is capitalism, not technofeudalism

Nicholas Gane
{"title":"Capitalism is capitalism, not technofeudalism","authors":"Nicholas Gane","doi":"10.1177/1468795x241269293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is twofold. First, it assesses Yanis Varoufakis’ theory of technofeudalism, and will argue, by way of response, that capitalism has not been displaced by a resurgence of feudalism, but is taking new forms that, increasingly, lie outside the powers of nation-states and of social democracy. Second, it questions the ‘libertarian Marxist’ alternative that Varoufakis proposes in its place, which abdicates any interest in the regulatory powers of the state and, paradoxically, advocates consumer-based political action to damage the market position of big corporate entities, even though markets and profits are said to be no longer central to the operation of technofeudalism.","PeriodicalId":508225,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Classical Sociology","volume":"41 51","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Classical Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795x241269293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is twofold. First, it assesses Yanis Varoufakis’ theory of technofeudalism, and will argue, by way of response, that capitalism has not been displaced by a resurgence of feudalism, but is taking new forms that, increasingly, lie outside the powers of nation-states and of social democracy. Second, it questions the ‘libertarian Marxist’ alternative that Varoufakis proposes in its place, which abdicates any interest in the regulatory powers of the state and, paradoxically, advocates consumer-based political action to damage the market position of big corporate entities, even though markets and profits are said to be no longer central to the operation of technofeudalism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
资本主义就是资本主义,而不是技术封建主义
本文有两个目的。首先,文章评估了亚尼斯-瓦鲁法基斯的技术封建主义理论,并将通过回应的方式论证,资本主义并未被封建主义的复苏所取代,而是正在以新的形式出现,而这些新形式正日益超出民族国家和社会民主的权力范围。其次,它质疑瓦鲁法基斯提出的 "自由主义马克思主义 "替代方案,该方案放弃了对国家监管权力的任何兴趣,并且自相矛盾地主张以消费者为基础的政治行动来损害大企业实体的市场地位,尽管市场和利润据说不再是技术封建主义运作的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Capitalism is capitalism, not technofeudalism The degradation of the analytic-synthetic method in Herbert Spencer’s sociology Translating phenomenology: Alfred Schutz and his many afterlives in American sociology Method for an historical political sociology of religion Max Weber’s Athens: The entanglement between charismatic domination and non-legitimate domination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1