Chondrule sizes within the CM carbonaceous chondrites and measurement methodologies

IF 2.2 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Meteoritics & Planetary Science Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1111/maps.14250
C. J. Floyd, S. Benito, P.-E. Martin, L. E. Jenkins, E. Dunham, L. Daly, M. R. Lee
{"title":"Chondrule sizes within the CM carbonaceous chondrites and measurement methodologies","authors":"C. J. Floyd,&nbsp;S. Benito,&nbsp;P.-E. Martin,&nbsp;L. E. Jenkins,&nbsp;E. Dunham,&nbsp;L. Daly,&nbsp;M. R. Lee","doi":"10.1111/maps.14250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The sizes of chondrules are a valuable tool for understanding relationships between meteorite groups and the affinity of ungrouped chondrites, documenting temporal/spatial variability in the solar nebula, and exploring the effects of parent body processing. Many of the recently reported sizes of chondrules within the CM carbonaceous chondrites differ significantly from the established literature average and are more closely comparable to those of chondrules within CO chondrites. Here, we report an updated analysis of chondrule dimensions within the CM group based on data from 1937 chondrules, obtained across a suite of CM lithologies ranging from petrologic subtypes CM2.2 to CM2.7. Our revised average CM chondrule size is 194 μm. Among the samples examined, a relationship was observed between petrologic subtype and chondrule size such that chondrule long-axis lengths are greater in the more highly aqueously altered lithologies. These findings suggest a greater similarity between the CM and CO chondrites than previously thought and support arguments for a genetic link between the two groups (i.e., the CM-CO clan). Using the 2-D and 3-D data gathered, we also apply numerous stereological corrections to examine their usefulness in correcting 2-D chondrule measurements within the CM chondrites. Alongside this analysis, we present the details of a standardized methodology for 2-D chondrule size measurement to facilitate more reliable inter-study comparisons.</p>","PeriodicalId":18555,"journal":{"name":"Meteoritics & Planetary Science","volume":"59 10","pages":"2769-2788"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/maps.14250","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meteoritics & Planetary Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maps.14250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sizes of chondrules are a valuable tool for understanding relationships between meteorite groups and the affinity of ungrouped chondrites, documenting temporal/spatial variability in the solar nebula, and exploring the effects of parent body processing. Many of the recently reported sizes of chondrules within the CM carbonaceous chondrites differ significantly from the established literature average and are more closely comparable to those of chondrules within CO chondrites. Here, we report an updated analysis of chondrule dimensions within the CM group based on data from 1937 chondrules, obtained across a suite of CM lithologies ranging from petrologic subtypes CM2.2 to CM2.7. Our revised average CM chondrule size is 194 μm. Among the samples examined, a relationship was observed between petrologic subtype and chondrule size such that chondrule long-axis lengths are greater in the more highly aqueously altered lithologies. These findings suggest a greater similarity between the CM and CO chondrites than previously thought and support arguments for a genetic link between the two groups (i.e., the CM-CO clan). Using the 2-D and 3-D data gathered, we also apply numerous stereological corrections to examine their usefulness in correcting 2-D chondrule measurements within the CM chondrites. Alongside this analysis, we present the details of a standardized methodology for 2-D chondrule size measurement to facilitate more reliable inter-study comparisons.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CM 碳质软玉的软骨尺寸和测量方法
对于了解陨石群之间的关系和未分类的软玉的亲缘关系、记录太阳星云的时间/空间变异性以及探索母体加工的影响,软玉的尺寸是一种宝贵的工具。最近报告的CM碳质软粒岩中的许多软粒的尺寸与文献中的平均值有很大不同,与CO软粒岩中的软粒的尺寸更接近。在此,我们根据从岩石学亚型CM2.2到CM2.7的一系列CM岩石中获得的1937颗软玉数据,报告了对CM类软玉尺寸的最新分析。我们修订后的 CM 软骨平均尺寸为 194 μm。在所研究的样品中,我们观察到岩石亚型与软骨大小之间的关系,即在水蚀变程度较高的岩性中,软骨的长轴长度较大。这些发现表明,CM和CO软玉之间的相似性比以前认为的要大,并支持这两类软玉之间存在遗传联系(即CM-CO家族)的论点。利用收集到的二维和三维数据,我们还应用了大量的立体学修正方法,以检验这些方法在修正 CM 硬质岩中的二维软骨测量值方面的实用性。在进行分析的同时,我们还详细介绍了二维软骨尺寸测量的标准化方法,以便进行更可靠的研究间比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Meteoritics & Planetary Science
Meteoritics & Planetary Science 地学天文-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
31.80%
发文量
121
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: First issued in 1953, the journal publishes research articles describing the latest results of new studies, invited reviews of major topics in planetary science, editorials on issues of current interest in the field, and book reviews. The publications are original, not considered for publication elsewhere, and undergo peer-review. The topics include the origin and history of the solar system, planets and natural satellites, interplanetary dust and interstellar medium, lunar samples, meteors, and meteorites, asteroids, comets, craters, and tektites. Our authors and editors are professional scientists representing numerous disciplines, including astronomy, astrophysics, physics, geophysics, chemistry, isotope geochemistry, mineralogy, earth science, geology, and biology. MAPS has subscribers in over 40 countries. Fifty percent of MAPS'' readers are based outside the USA. The journal is available in hard copy and online.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cover Constraints on the impact history of the Apollo 16 landing site: Implications of soil-like breccia noble gas records Issue Information Cover
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1