When being smart trumps AI: An exploration into consumer preferences for smart vs. AI-powered products

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108405
MyungJin Chung Smale , Joseph D. Fox , Alexa K. Fox
{"title":"When being smart trumps AI: An exploration into consumer preferences for smart vs. AI-powered products","authors":"MyungJin Chung Smale ,&nbsp;Joseph D. Fox ,&nbsp;Alexa K. Fox","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Prior to the rapid growth of Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) in the consumer market, smart products received great attention from marketers and consumers. Given the recent increase in attention to AI technologies, this research explores consumers' preferences and intentions when products are framed as “smart” versus “AI-powered.” While previous literature has explored AI products and smart products individually, little is known about consumers’ preferences between the two products simultaneously. Three empirical experiments demonstrate that consumers show preference for products labeled as “smart” over those labeled as “AI-powered.” This preference is mediated by enhanced learning anxiety related to AI. The findings provide insights for marketers applying message framing, suggesting that labeling products as “smart” may evoke more favorable consumer behavior compared to the “AI-powered” label. Moreover, this research significantly contributes to the existing literature on perceptions and intentions related to AI and smart products by concurrently exploring consumer preferences regarding both smart products and AI-powered products.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 108405"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224002735/pdfft?md5=afb365db2fb65566e8a092c88efb4c8e&pid=1-s2.0-S0747563224002735-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224002735","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior to the rapid growth of Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) in the consumer market, smart products received great attention from marketers and consumers. Given the recent increase in attention to AI technologies, this research explores consumers' preferences and intentions when products are framed as “smart” versus “AI-powered.” While previous literature has explored AI products and smart products individually, little is known about consumers’ preferences between the two products simultaneously. Three empirical experiments demonstrate that consumers show preference for products labeled as “smart” over those labeled as “AI-powered.” This preference is mediated by enhanced learning anxiety related to AI. The findings provide insights for marketers applying message framing, suggesting that labeling products as “smart” may evoke more favorable consumer behavior compared to the “AI-powered” label. Moreover, this research significantly contributes to the existing literature on perceptions and intentions related to AI and smart products by concurrently exploring consumer preferences regarding both smart products and AI-powered products.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当智能战胜人工智能:消费者对智能产品与人工智能产品的偏好探索
在人工智能("AI")在消费市场迅速发展之前,智能产品受到了营销人员和消费者的极大关注。鉴于近来人工智能技术受到越来越多的关注,本研究探讨了当产品被定义为 "智能 "与 "人工智能驱动 "时,消费者的偏好和意图。以往的文献对人工智能产品和智能产品进行了单独探讨,但对消费者同时对这两种产品的偏好却知之甚少。三项实证实验证明,消费者对标有 "智能 "的产品比标有 "人工智能驱动 "的产品更有偏好。这种偏好是由与人工智能相关的学习焦虑增强所促成的。研究结果为营销人员应用信息框架提供了启示,表明与 "AI-powered "标签相比,贴上 "smart "标签的产品可能会唤起消费者更多的行为偏好。此外,这项研究通过同时探讨消费者对智能产品和人工智能驱动产品的偏好,对现有关于人工智能和智能产品相关认知和意图的文献做出了重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
期刊最新文献
What makes an app authentic? Determining antecedents of perceived authenticity in an AI-powered service app The effects of self-explanation on game-based learning: Evidence from eye-tracking analyses Avatars at risk: Exploring public response to sexual violence in immersive digital spaces Perception of non-binary social media users towards authentic non-binary social media influencers Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1