How resilient are regional industrial decarbonization pathways? Insights from the building materials industry in Lower Austria

Nora Voßbeck , Sebastian Fastenrath
{"title":"How resilient are regional industrial decarbonization pathways? Insights from the building materials industry in Lower Austria","authors":"Nora Voßbeck ,&nbsp;Sebastian Fastenrath","doi":"10.1016/j.peg.2024.100019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is often assumed that crises are important catalysts for structural change. In this vein, ‘build back better’ programs are sought to tackle acute crisis and, at the same time, catalyze paths towards less carbon-intense production and consumption. However, little is known about how crises affect ongoing decarbonization efforts in different industry sectors and how this might differ in a variety of regional contexts. The building sector has been identified as one of the largest global contributors to greenhouse gas emissions and resource consumption. That is why a faster uptake of low-carbon building materials such as green cement and wood is a key goal. Based on a qualitative content analysis, which includes expert interviews, this paper traces the uptake of low carbon products in the building materials industry in the Lower Austrian region. To better understand the regional decarbonization pathway and the impact of the COVID-19 crisis, this paper explores key events, processes and related stakeholders that may accelerate or decelerate the dynamics of regional decarbonization pathways. The analysis shows that the industry’s decarbonization efforts have continued, but no significant catalysing effects from the crisis could be identified.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101047,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Economic Geography","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100019"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949694224000130/pdfft?md5=87a1464fc63dba0b39bb100e043b47e4&pid=1-s2.0-S2949694224000130-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Economic Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949694224000130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is often assumed that crises are important catalysts for structural change. In this vein, ‘build back better’ programs are sought to tackle acute crisis and, at the same time, catalyze paths towards less carbon-intense production and consumption. However, little is known about how crises affect ongoing decarbonization efforts in different industry sectors and how this might differ in a variety of regional contexts. The building sector has been identified as one of the largest global contributors to greenhouse gas emissions and resource consumption. That is why a faster uptake of low-carbon building materials such as green cement and wood is a key goal. Based on a qualitative content analysis, which includes expert interviews, this paper traces the uptake of low carbon products in the building materials industry in the Lower Austrian region. To better understand the regional decarbonization pathway and the impact of the COVID-19 crisis, this paper explores key events, processes and related stakeholders that may accelerate or decelerate the dynamics of regional decarbonization pathways. The analysis shows that the industry’s decarbonization efforts have continued, but no significant catalysing effects from the crisis could be identified.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地区工业去碳化道路的弹性如何?下奥地利州建材工业的启示
人们通常认为,危机是结构变革的重要催化剂。因此,"重建得更好 "计划旨在解决严重危机,同时促进减少碳密集型生产和消费。然而,人们对危机如何影响不同行业部门正在进行的去碳化努力,以及在不同地区背景下这种影响可能有何不同知之甚少。建筑行业已被确定为全球温室气体排放和资源消耗的最大贡献者之一。因此,加快采用绿色水泥和木材等低碳建筑材料是一个关键目标。本文基于定性内容分析(包括专家访谈),追溯了下奥地利地区建材行业对低碳产品的采用情况。为了更好地理解地区去碳化路径和 COVID-19 危机的影响,本文探讨了可能加速或减缓地区去碳化路径动态的关键事件、过程和相关利益方。分析表明,该行业的去碳化努力仍在继续,但无法确定危机的重大催化效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cryptocurrencies, a controversial innovation? Unpacking argumentation analysis in economic geography Growing pains in upscaling: A constructive technology assessment of sea lice treatment innovations in the stagnating Norwegian aquaculture regime “If the news is fake, imagine history”: The network state and the second bourgeois revolution Plotting cryptoeconomic imaginaries and counterplotting the network state A stack made in heaven? Exploring AI-blockchain intersections and their implications for labour and value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1