Does shrinkage have an impact on urban livability? An empirical analysis from Northeast China

IF 10.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Sustainable Cities and Society Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2024.105725
{"title":"Does shrinkage have an impact on urban livability? An empirical analysis from Northeast China","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2024.105725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Urban shrinkage has emerged as a global socioeconomic development issue, presenting new challenges for countries in advancing the construction of livable cities. To investigate whether urban shrinkage has an impact on urban livability (UL), along with its underlying mechanisms and transmission paths, this study employed comparative inductive analysis and took Northeast China as a case for theoretical discussion and empirical validation. The results indicated that: (1) Shrinkage did have an impact on UL, which was dominated by negative effects and supplemented by positive effects. Furthermore, it exhibited characteristics of phased and dimensional heterogeneity, with significant spatial differentiation. (2) The impact of shrinkage on UL was essentially a comprehensive result of the interplay between the positive and negative effects arising from changes in urban development capacity and per capita occupancy caused by shrinkage. This process involved both variable transmission paths and stock transmission paths, jointly explaining the positive and negative shrinkage effects. This study provides a new perspective on rational cognition for coping with shrinkage effects and their generative logic, as well as theoretical insights for other countries around the world to optimize UL in shrinkage scenarios.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221067072400550X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban shrinkage has emerged as a global socioeconomic development issue, presenting new challenges for countries in advancing the construction of livable cities. To investigate whether urban shrinkage has an impact on urban livability (UL), along with its underlying mechanisms and transmission paths, this study employed comparative inductive analysis and took Northeast China as a case for theoretical discussion and empirical validation. The results indicated that: (1) Shrinkage did have an impact on UL, which was dominated by negative effects and supplemented by positive effects. Furthermore, it exhibited characteristics of phased and dimensional heterogeneity, with significant spatial differentiation. (2) The impact of shrinkage on UL was essentially a comprehensive result of the interplay between the positive and negative effects arising from changes in urban development capacity and per capita occupancy caused by shrinkage. This process involved both variable transmission paths and stock transmission paths, jointly explaining the positive and negative shrinkage effects. This study provides a new perspective on rational cognition for coping with shrinkage effects and their generative logic, as well as theoretical insights for other countries around the world to optimize UL in shrinkage scenarios.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
萎缩对城市宜居性有影响吗?来自中国东北地区的实证分析
城市萎缩已成为全球性的社会经济发展问题,对各国推进宜居城市建设提出了新的挑战。为探究城市萎缩是否对城市宜居性(UL)产生影响及其内在机制和传导路径,本研究采用比较归纳分析法,以中国东北地区为例进行理论探讨和实证验证。研究结果表明(1) 城市收缩确实对城市宜居性产生了影响,这种影响以负面效应为主,正面效应为辅。此外,它还表现出阶段性和维度异质性的特点,空间差异显著。(2) 缩小对超低容量的影响本质上是缩小引起的城市发展能力和人均居住面积变化所产生的正负效应相互作用的综合结果。这一过程涉及变量传导路径和存量传导路径,共同解释了萎缩的正负效应。这项研究为应对萎缩效应的理性认知及其生成逻辑提供了新的视角,也为世界其他国家在萎缩情景下优化 UL 提供了理论启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Cities and Society
Sustainable Cities and Society Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
13.70%
发文量
810
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including: 1. Smart cities and resilient environments; 2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management; 3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management); 4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities; 5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments; 6. Green infrastructure and BMPs; 7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management; 8. Urban agriculture and forestry; 9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure; 10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy; 11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities; 12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities; 13. Health monitoring and improvement; 14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies; 15. Smart city governance; 16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society; 17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies; 18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems. 19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management; 20. Waste reduction and recycling; 21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling; 22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;
期刊最新文献
How sustainable is electric vehicle adoption? Insights from a PRISMA review A tri-level hybrid stochastic-IGDT dynamic planning model for resilience enhancement of community-integrated energy systems Non-locality and spillover effects of residential flood damage on community recovery: Insights from high-resolution flood claim and mobility data Enhanced modeling of vehicle-induced turbulence and pollutant dispersion in urban street canyon: Large-eddy simulation via dynamic overset mesh approach Dynamic integrated simulation of carbon emission reduction potential in China's building sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1