Computer-Controlled Local Anaesthesia Delivery efficacy − a literature review

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Saudi Dental Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.05.012
Katarzyna Janik, Wojciech Niemczyk, Robert Peterek, Rafał Rój, Agnieszka Balicz, Tadeusz Morawiec
{"title":"Computer-Controlled Local Anaesthesia Delivery efficacy − a literature review","authors":"Katarzyna Janik,&nbsp;Wojciech Niemczyk,&nbsp;Robert Peterek,&nbsp;Rafał Rój,&nbsp;Agnieszka Balicz,&nbsp;Tadeusz Morawiec","doi":"10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Minimising pain with effective local anaesthesia is an essential step towards improving the level of dentally anxious patients’ comfort during dental treatment. It can be provided by many different techniques. One of them is using the Computer-Controlled Local Anaesthesia Delivery systems (CCLADs). This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of computerised anaesthesia with the conventional technique in terms of perceived pain. A database literature search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar, covering up the period between 2015 and 2023. Only the studies comparing computerised anaesthesia technique with the use of conventional carpule were included. An overview of 20 relevant studies (n = 1347 subjects) was provided including pediatric patients, as well as the adults. The evaluated parameters were: pain, child’s behaviour, heart rate, blood pressure, level of satisfaction, anxiety, further anaesthesia method preference, need for additional anaesthetic, as well as the duration of anaesthesia, measured by different scales, devices and questionnaires. The present literature review led the authors to the conclusion, that the use of CCLADs is significantly less painful than the traditional anaesthesia and it is a promising technique for helping patients deal with pain perception. However, it is advisable to conduct further research on the use of CCLAD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47246,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Dental Journal","volume":"36 8","pages":"Pages 1066-1071"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905224001688/pdfft?md5=e8ef6f70a710110ad7c5363246ca41ed&pid=1-s2.0-S1013905224001688-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905224001688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Minimising pain with effective local anaesthesia is an essential step towards improving the level of dentally anxious patients’ comfort during dental treatment. It can be provided by many different techniques. One of them is using the Computer-Controlled Local Anaesthesia Delivery systems (CCLADs). This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of computerised anaesthesia with the conventional technique in terms of perceived pain. A database literature search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar, covering up the period between 2015 and 2023. Only the studies comparing computerised anaesthesia technique with the use of conventional carpule were included. An overview of 20 relevant studies (n = 1347 subjects) was provided including pediatric patients, as well as the adults. The evaluated parameters were: pain, child’s behaviour, heart rate, blood pressure, level of satisfaction, anxiety, further anaesthesia method preference, need for additional anaesthetic, as well as the duration of anaesthesia, measured by different scales, devices and questionnaires. The present literature review led the authors to the conclusion, that the use of CCLADs is significantly less painful than the traditional anaesthesia and it is a promising technique for helping patients deal with pain perception. However, it is advisable to conduct further research on the use of CCLAD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机控制的局部麻醉效果--文献综述
通过有效的局部麻醉将疼痛降至最低,是提高牙科焦虑症患者在牙科治疗期间舒适度的重要一步。这可以通过许多不同的技术来实现。其中之一就是使用计算机控制局部麻醉给药系统(CCLADs)。本研究旨在比较计算机化麻醉与传统技术在疼痛感方面的功效。我们在 PubMed、Cochrane Library 和 Google Scholar 上进行了数据库文献检索,时间跨度为 2015 年至 2023 年。仅纳入了将计算机化麻醉技术与传统麻醉技术进行比较的研究。概述了 20 项相关研究(n = 1347 名受试者),包括儿童患者和成人患者。评估参数包括:疼痛、儿童行为、心率、血压、满意度、焦虑、对进一步麻醉方法的偏好、对额外麻醉剂的需求以及麻醉持续时间,这些参数通过不同的量表、设备和问卷进行测量。通过本文献综述,作者得出结论:使用 CCLADs 的痛苦明显少于传统麻醉,是一种帮助患者解决痛觉问题的有前途的技术。不过,最好对 CCLAD 的使用进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Dental Journal
Saudi Dental Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Dental Journal is an English language, peer-reviewed scholarly publication in the area of dentistry. Saudi Dental Journal publishes original research and reviews on, but not limited to: • dental disease • clinical trials • dental equipment • new and experimental techniques • epidemiology and oral health • restorative dentistry • periodontology • endodontology • prosthodontics • paediatric dentistry • orthodontics and dental education Saudi Dental Journal is the official publication of the Saudi Dental Society and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Assessing the quality of AI information from ChatGPT regarding oral surgery, preventive dentistry, and oral cancer: An exploration study An in vitro study of fluoride-preloaded halloysite nanotubes to enhance the fluoride release in conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements Association between dental diseases and stroke Drug delivery systems in periodontitis: A visualization and bibliometric analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1