Epistemologies of corpus linguistics across disciplines

Pascual Pérez-Paredes , Niall Curry
{"title":"Epistemologies of corpus linguistics across disciplines","authors":"Pascual Pérez-Paredes ,&nbsp;Niall Curry","doi":"10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the growing use of corpus linguistics across an ever-growing range of disciplines such as sociology, sports studies, journalism, media discourse or education, there is a dearth of research that examines the epistemological foundations of corpus methods in these disciplines. This paper builds on well-established conceptualisations about research methodology and the role of methods in the wider literature. Drawing on existing discussions about the use of research methods in objectivist and subjectivist conceptualisations of social reality, we seek to bring to the fore the underlying methodological tensions found in the use of corpus linguistics in the application of corpus methods in research that lies outside the interest of major linguistic disciplines. Through this process, we explore how the notions of natural language use and data elicitation are interpreted by current research in order to advance our understanding of how experts from different research camps engage with and epistemologically localise corpus linguistics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101075,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766124000478/pdfft?md5=7ff713268dc0a0ea524fd741853d45d0&pid=1-s2.0-S2772766124000478-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766124000478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the growing use of corpus linguistics across an ever-growing range of disciplines such as sociology, sports studies, journalism, media discourse or education, there is a dearth of research that examines the epistemological foundations of corpus methods in these disciplines. This paper builds on well-established conceptualisations about research methodology and the role of methods in the wider literature. Drawing on existing discussions about the use of research methods in objectivist and subjectivist conceptualisations of social reality, we seek to bring to the fore the underlying methodological tensions found in the use of corpus linguistics in the application of corpus methods in research that lies outside the interest of major linguistic disciplines. Through this process, we explore how the notions of natural language use and data elicitation are interpreted by current research in order to advance our understanding of how experts from different research camps engage with and epistemologically localise corpus linguistics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨学科的语料库语言学认识论
尽管语料库语言学在社会学、体育研究、新闻学、媒体话语或教育学等越来越多的学科中得到越来越广泛的应用,但研究这些学科中语料库方法的认识论基础的研究却十分匮乏。本文以有关研究方法论和方法在更广泛的文献中的作用的成熟概念为基础。借鉴现有的关于在社会现实的客观主义和主观主义概念中使用研究方法的讨论,我们试图揭示语料库语言学在应用语料库方法进行主要语言学学科兴趣之外的研究时所发现的潜在方法论紧张关系。通过这一过程,我们探讨了当前的研究如何解释自然语言使用和数据激发的概念,以促进我们对不同研究阵营的专家如何参与语料库语言学并在认识论上将其本土化的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Toward ethical praxis in longitudinal research with children: Reflecting on ethical tensions in participatory research A conversation analysis-complex dynamics systems theory (CA-CDST) approach for analyzing longitudinal development in L2 pragmatics Categorising speakers’ language background: Theoretical assumptions and methodological challenges for learner corpus research Data from role plays and elicited conversations: What do they show about L2 interactional competence?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1