Functional Outcomes Following Interposition Elbow Arthroplasty Using Fascia Lata Graft for Post-Traumatic Elbow Osteoarthritis Without Ligament Reconstruction: A Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up Study

Iman W. Aminata MD , Dina Aprilya MD , Erica Kholinne MD, PhD , Holong Mangasah MD , Jansen Lee MD
{"title":"Functional Outcomes Following Interposition Elbow Arthroplasty Using Fascia Lata Graft for Post-Traumatic Elbow Osteoarthritis Without Ligament Reconstruction: A Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up Study","authors":"Iman W. Aminata MD ,&nbsp;Dina Aprilya MD ,&nbsp;Erica Kholinne MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Holong Mangasah MD ,&nbsp;Jansen Lee MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Elbow osteoarthritis is a debilitating disease for patients. Surgical options are to be considered when conservative management becomes unsatisfactory. Total elbow arthroplasty is an effective surgical option for patients older than 65 years and those with a sedentary lifestyle. Meanwhile, interposition elbow arthroplasty is suitable for young, high-demand patients. The retrospective study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of interposition elbow arthroplasty for elbow osteoarthritis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eight patients who underwent interposition elbow arthroplasty from 2018 to 2020 in our center were retrospectively reviewed. Interposition elbow arthroplasty was performed using fascia lata autografts. Mayo elbow performance score; disability of arm, shoulder, and hand scores; and range of motion were evaluated and compared with that of the preoperative state.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean Mayo elbow performance score significantly improved from 53.7 ± 14.6 (before surgery) to 85.6 ± 12.1 (after surgery). The mean disability of arm, shoulder, and hand score also significantly improved from 93.1 ± 11.8 (before surgery) to 57.5 ± 15.9 (after surgery). The mean arc of motion increased by 85.8°, from a mean before surgery value of 6.2° ± 5.8° to 92.0° ± 34.0° after surgery. Satisfaction rate was 92.5%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Interposition elbow arthroplasty is a nonprosthetic reconstruction that respects the joint and does not burn any bridge for further total elbow arthroplasty if needed. It provides favorable surgical outcomes with high satisfaction rates among young patients with elbow osteoarthritis.</p></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><p>Therapeutic IV.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"6 4","pages":"Pages 571-576"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514124001063/pdfft?md5=e78a67555748c043d732cce1b46166f8&pid=1-s2.0-S2589514124001063-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514124001063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Elbow osteoarthritis is a debilitating disease for patients. Surgical options are to be considered when conservative management becomes unsatisfactory. Total elbow arthroplasty is an effective surgical option for patients older than 65 years and those with a sedentary lifestyle. Meanwhile, interposition elbow arthroplasty is suitable for young, high-demand patients. The retrospective study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of interposition elbow arthroplasty for elbow osteoarthritis.

Methods

Eight patients who underwent interposition elbow arthroplasty from 2018 to 2020 in our center were retrospectively reviewed. Interposition elbow arthroplasty was performed using fascia lata autografts. Mayo elbow performance score; disability of arm, shoulder, and hand scores; and range of motion were evaluated and compared with that of the preoperative state.

Results

The mean Mayo elbow performance score significantly improved from 53.7 ± 14.6 (before surgery) to 85.6 ± 12.1 (after surgery). The mean disability of arm, shoulder, and hand score also significantly improved from 93.1 ± 11.8 (before surgery) to 57.5 ± 15.9 (after surgery). The mean arc of motion increased by 85.8°, from a mean before surgery value of 6.2° ± 5.8° to 92.0° ± 34.0° after surgery. Satisfaction rate was 92.5%.

Conclusions

Interposition elbow arthroplasty is a nonprosthetic reconstruction that respects the joint and does not burn any bridge for further total elbow arthroplasty if needed. It provides favorable surgical outcomes with high satisfaction rates among young patients with elbow osteoarthritis.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用筋膜移植治疗创伤后肘关节骨性关节炎而不进行韧带重建的肘关节置换术后的功能效果:最短 3 年随访研究
目的肘关节骨关节炎是一种使患者衰弱的疾病。当保守治疗效果不理想时,应考虑手术治疗。全肘关节置换术对于 65 岁以上和久坐不动的患者来说是一种有效的手术选择。同时,肘关节置换术适用于年轻、需求量大的患者。该回顾性研究旨在评估肘关节置换术治疗肘关节骨性关节炎的手术效果。方法回顾性分析2018年至2020年在本中心接受肘关节置换术的8例患者。使用筋膜自体移植进行肘关节置换术。对Mayo肘关节性能评分、手臂、肩部和手部残疾评分以及活动范围进行了评估,并与术前状态进行了比较。结果Mayo肘关节性能评分的平均值从53.7±14.6(术前)显著改善至85.6±12.1(术后)。手臂、肩部和手部的平均残疾评分也从术前的 93.1 ± 11.8 显著提高到术后的 57.5 ± 15.9。平均活动弧度增加了 85.8°,从术前的 6.2° ± 5.8°增加到术后的 92.0° ± 34.0°。结论间位肘关节置换术是一种非假体重建术,既尊重关节,又不会在必要时为进一步的全肘关节置换术搭建桥梁。它为年轻的肘关节骨性关节炎患者提供了良好的手术效果和较高的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Scaphoid Fractures and Nonunion: A Survey-based Review of Hand Surgeon’s Practice and the Evidence Hook of Hamate Regrowth After Surgical Excision: A Report of Two Cases Possible Bupivacaine Induced Hepatitis Following Wide Awake, Local Anesthesia, No Tourniquet Carpal Tunnel Surgery: A Case Report Digital Papillary Adenocarcinoma: A Case Presentation and Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1