When, What, and how should generative artificial intelligence explain to Users?

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Telematics and Informatics Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1016/j.tele.2024.102175
Soobin Jang , Haeyoon Lee , Yujin Kim , Daeho Lee , Jungwoo Shin , Jungwoo Nam
{"title":"When, What, and how should generative artificial intelligence explain to Users?","authors":"Soobin Jang ,&nbsp;Haeyoon Lee ,&nbsp;Yujin Kim ,&nbsp;Daeho Lee ,&nbsp;Jungwoo Shin ,&nbsp;Jungwoo Nam","doi":"10.1016/j.tele.2024.102175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the commercialization of <em>ChatGPT</em>, generative artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied almost everywhere in our lives. However, even though generative AI has become a daily technology that anyone can use, most non-majors need to know the process and reason for the results because it can be misused due to lack of sufficient knowledge and misunderstanding. Therefore, this study investigated users’ preferences for when, what, and how generative AI should provide explanations about the process of generating and the reasoning behind the results, using conjoint method and mixed logit analysis. The results show that users are most sensitive to the timing of providing eXplainable AI (XAI), and that users want additional information only when they ask for explanations during the process of using generative AI. The results of this study will help shape the XAI design of future generative AI from a user perspective and improve usability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48257,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 102175"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585324000790","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the commercialization of ChatGPT, generative artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied almost everywhere in our lives. However, even though generative AI has become a daily technology that anyone can use, most non-majors need to know the process and reason for the results because it can be misused due to lack of sufficient knowledge and misunderstanding. Therefore, this study investigated users’ preferences for when, what, and how generative AI should provide explanations about the process of generating and the reasoning behind the results, using conjoint method and mixed logit analysis. The results show that users are most sensitive to the timing of providing eXplainable AI (XAI), and that users want additional information only when they ask for explanations during the process of using generative AI. The results of this study will help shape the XAI design of future generative AI from a user perspective and improve usability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生成式人工智能应该在何时、做什么、如何向用户解释?
随着 ChatGPT 的商业化,生成式人工智能(AI)在我们生活中的应用几乎无处不在。然而,尽管生成式人工智能已成为人人都能使用的日常技术,大多数非专业人士仍需要了解其过程和结果的原因,因为缺乏足够的知识和误解可能会导致误用。因此,本研究采用联合法和混合对数分析法,调查了用户对生成式人工智能应在何时、提供什么以及如何提供生成过程和结果背后原因的解释的偏好。研究结果表明,用户对提供可解释人工智能(XAI)的时间最为敏感,只有在使用生成式人工智能的过程中要求解释时,用户才会希望获得额外信息。这项研究的结果将有助于从用户角度出发,塑造未来生成式人工智能的 XAI 设计,并提高可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Telematics and Informatics
Telematics and Informatics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Telematics and Informatics is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge theoretical and methodological research exploring the social, economic, geographic, political, and cultural impacts of digital technologies. It covers various application areas, such as smart cities, sensors, information fusion, digital society, IoT, cyber-physical technologies, privacy, knowledge management, distributed work, emergency response, mobile communications, health informatics, social media's psychosocial effects, ICT for sustainable development, blockchain, e-commerce, and e-government.
期刊最新文献
Towards harmonization of EU and UN methodologies for the assessment of eGovernment The silence of the LLMs: Cross-lingual analysis of guardrail-related political bias and false information prevalence in ChatGPT, Google Bard (Gemini), and Bing Chat How to fight loneliness: The importance of networked friendship quality and self-esteem differs with age Overcoming social and ethical challenges of AI through organizational resilience. A PLS-SEM approach Understanding online shopping fraud among Chinese elderly: Extending routine activity theory in the online context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1