Which Position for Novice Surgeons? Effect of Supine and Prone Positions on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Learning Curve

Q4 Medicine Medicina Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.3390/medicina60081292
Ender Cem Bulut, Uğur Aydın, Çağrı Coşkun, Serhat Çetin, Ali Ünsal, Fazlı Polat, Bora Küpeli
{"title":"Which Position for Novice Surgeons? Effect of Supine and Prone Positions on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Learning Curve","authors":"Ender Cem Bulut, Uğur Aydın, Çağrı Coşkun, Serhat Çetin, Ali Ünsal, Fazlı Polat, Bora Küpeli","doi":"10.3390/medicina60081292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a current treatment method with high success rates and low complication rates in treating large kidney stones. It can be conducted in different positions, especially supine and prone positions. PCNL in the supine position is becoming increasingly common due to its advantages, such as simultaneous retrograde intervention and better anesthesia management. This study aimed to assess how the choice of position impacts the PCNL learning curve. Materials and Methods: The results of the first 50 consecutive PCNL cases performed by two separate chief residents as primary surgeons in supine and prone positions in a reference center for stone treatment between August 2021 and January 2023 were evaluated. The two groups’ demographic and clinical data, stone-free rates, operation times, and fluoroscopy times were compared. Results: While the mean operation time was 94.6 ± 9.8 min in the supine PCNL group, it was 129.9 ± 20.3 min in the prone PCNL group (p < 0.001). Median fluoroscopy times in the supine PCNL and prone PCNL groups were 31 (10–89) seconds and 48 (23–156) seconds, respectively (p = 0.001). During the operation, the plateau was reached after the 10th case in the supine PCNL group, while it was reached after the 40th case in the prone PCNL group. Conclusions: For surgeons who are novices in performing PCNL, supine PCNL may offer both better results and a faster learning curve. Prospective and randomized studies can provide more robust conclusions on this subject.","PeriodicalId":18512,"journal":{"name":"Medicina","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60081292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a current treatment method with high success rates and low complication rates in treating large kidney stones. It can be conducted in different positions, especially supine and prone positions. PCNL in the supine position is becoming increasingly common due to its advantages, such as simultaneous retrograde intervention and better anesthesia management. This study aimed to assess how the choice of position impacts the PCNL learning curve. Materials and Methods: The results of the first 50 consecutive PCNL cases performed by two separate chief residents as primary surgeons in supine and prone positions in a reference center for stone treatment between August 2021 and January 2023 were evaluated. The two groups’ demographic and clinical data, stone-free rates, operation times, and fluoroscopy times were compared. Results: While the mean operation time was 94.6 ± 9.8 min in the supine PCNL group, it was 129.9 ± 20.3 min in the prone PCNL group (p < 0.001). Median fluoroscopy times in the supine PCNL and prone PCNL groups were 31 (10–89) seconds and 48 (23–156) seconds, respectively (p = 0.001). During the operation, the plateau was reached after the 10th case in the supine PCNL group, while it was reached after the 40th case in the prone PCNL group. Conclusions: For surgeons who are novices in performing PCNL, supine PCNL may offer both better results and a faster learning curve. Prospective and randomized studies can provide more robust conclusions on this subject.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哪种体位适合外科医生新手?仰卧位和俯卧位对经皮肾镜取石术学习曲线的影响
背景和目的:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是目前治疗大块肾结石的一种成功率高、并发症少的方法。它可以在不同体位下进行,尤其是仰卧位和俯卧位。仰卧位 PCNL 因其同时逆行介入和更好的麻醉管理等优点而越来越普遍。本研究旨在评估体位选择对 PCNL 学习曲线的影响。材料和方法:在 2021 年 8 月至 2023 年 1 月期间,在一家结石治疗参考中心,由两名不同的住院总医师作为主刀医师,分别采用仰卧位和俯卧位进行了前 50 例连续 PCNL 手术,并对手术结果进行了评估。比较了两组的人口统计学和临床数据、无石率、手术时间和透视时间。结果显示仰卧 PCNL 组的平均手术时间为 94.6 ± 9.8 分钟,而俯卧 PCNL 组为 129.9 ± 20.3 分钟(P < 0.001)。仰卧 PCNL 组和俯卧 PCNL 组的中位透视时间分别为 31(10-89)秒和 48(23-156)秒(p = 0.001)。在手术过程中,仰卧 PCNL 组在第 10 个病例后达到高峰,而俯卧 PCNL 组在第 40 个病例后达到高峰。结论对于 PCNL 手术新手来说,仰卧 PCNL 可能会带来更好的效果和更快的学习曲线。前瞻性随机研究可就此得出更可靠的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina
Medicina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Publicada con el apoyo del Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva. Medicina no tiene propósitos comerciales. El objeto de su creación ha sido propender al adelanto de la medicina argentina. Los beneficios que pudieran obtenerse serán aplicados exclusivamente a ese fin.
期刊最新文献
Insights into the Two Most Common Cancers of Primitive Gut-Derived Structures and Their Microbial Connections Intravital Position Study of the Clinical Anatomy of the Middle Lobe and Superior Poles of the Thyroid Gland An Analysis of Emergency Surgical Outcomes for Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: A Ten-Year Single-Institute Retrospective Study in Taiwan Evaluation of Left Atrial Electromechanical Delay and Left Atrial Phasic Functions in Patients Undergoing Treatment with Cardiotoxic Chemotherapeutic Agents Self-Reported Gastrointestinal Symptoms Associated with NSAIDs and Caffeine Consumption in a Jordanian Subpopulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1