Genomic sequencing in newborn screening: balancing consent with the right of the asymptomatic at-risk child to be found.

IF 3.7 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY European Journal of Human Genetics Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1038/s41431-024-01677-w
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Ana Eliza Bonilha, Anne-Marie Laberge, Arzoo Ahmed, Ainsley J Newson
{"title":"Genomic sequencing in newborn screening: balancing consent with the right of the asymptomatic at-risk child to be found.","authors":"Bartha Maria Knoppers, Ana Eliza Bonilha, Anne-Marie Laberge, Arzoo Ahmed, Ainsley J Newson","doi":"10.1038/s41431-024-01677-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, we explore key aspects of the complex ethical and legal landscape surrounding consent in the context of incorporating genomic sequencing into existing newborn bloodspot screening programs. In particular, we consider the potential impact of genomic sequencing on the health rights of the child in relation to existing consent practices in newborn screening. We begin with an introduction to newborn screening programs and their population health goals. We then discuss public health ethics as a rationale underpinning newborn screening before turning to consent. We go on to describe seven current research projects on genomic sequencing in newborn screening and then introduce the 'right of the asymptomatic at-risk child to be found' as a useful concept to draw on when considering consent to newborn screening. We draw on this novel right to argue for the adoption of \"appropriate consent\" when it comes to certain uses of genomics in newborn screening. We contend that, for 'virtual panels' at least, appropriate consent proportionately balances the ongoing universality of newborn screening for important health conditions with an acknowledgement of the complex outcomes that bringing a complicated diagnostic technology into the screening domain will generate.</p>","PeriodicalId":12016,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Human Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-024-01677-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we explore key aspects of the complex ethical and legal landscape surrounding consent in the context of incorporating genomic sequencing into existing newborn bloodspot screening programs. In particular, we consider the potential impact of genomic sequencing on the health rights of the child in relation to existing consent practices in newborn screening. We begin with an introduction to newborn screening programs and their population health goals. We then discuss public health ethics as a rationale underpinning newborn screening before turning to consent. We go on to describe seven current research projects on genomic sequencing in newborn screening and then introduce the 'right of the asymptomatic at-risk child to be found' as a useful concept to draw on when considering consent to newborn screening. We draw on this novel right to argue for the adoption of "appropriate consent" when it comes to certain uses of genomics in newborn screening. We contend that, for 'virtual panels' at least, appropriate consent proportionately balances the ongoing universality of newborn screening for important health conditions with an acknowledgement of the complex outcomes that bringing a complicated diagnostic technology into the screening domain will generate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿筛查中的基因组测序:平衡同意与发现无症状高危儿童的权利。
在本文中,我们探讨了在将基因组测序纳入现有新生儿血斑筛查计划的背景下,围绕同意权的复杂伦理和法律问题的关键方面。特别是,我们考虑了基因组测序对儿童健康权的潜在影响,以及新生儿筛查中现有的同意做法。我们首先介绍了新生儿筛查项目及其人口健康目标。然后,我们将讨论作为新生儿筛查基础的公共卫生伦理,最后再讨论同意问题。我们接着介绍了目前在新生儿筛查中开展的七个基因组测序研究项目,然后介绍了 "无症状高危儿童被发现的权利",这是在考虑新生儿筛查同意权时可以借鉴的一个有用概念。在新生儿筛查中基因组学的某些用途方面,我们借鉴这一新颖的权利,主张采用 "适当的同意"。我们认为,至少就 "虚拟面板 "而言,适当的同意既能平衡新生儿重要健康状况筛查的持续普遍性,又能承认将复杂的诊断技术引入筛查领域将产生的复杂结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Human Genetics
European Journal of Human Genetics 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
216
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Human Genetics is the official journal of the European Society of Human Genetics, publishing high-quality, original research papers, short reports and reviews in the rapidly expanding field of human genetics and genomics. It covers molecular, clinical and cytogenetics, interfacing between advanced biomedical research and the clinician, and bridging the great diversity of facilities, resources and viewpoints in the genetics community. Key areas include: -Monogenic and multifactorial disorders -Development and malformation -Hereditary cancer -Medical Genomics -Gene mapping and functional studies -Genotype-phenotype correlations -Genetic variation and genome diversity -Statistical and computational genetics -Bioinformatics -Advances in diagnostics -Therapy and prevention -Animal models -Genetic services -Community genetics
期刊最新文献
Polygenic risk scores in the clinic: a systematic review of stakeholders' perspectives, attitudes, and experiences. WDR45-related encephalopathy mimicking Leigh syndrome associated with complex I deficiency: a case report. Huntingtin CAG repeat size variations below the Huntington's disease threshold: associations with depression, anxiety and basal ganglia structure. November in EJHG: looking at genetic counsellor training in Europe, novel clinical guidelines and ancestral impact on variant interpretation Using a behaviour-change approach to support uptake of population genomic screening and management options for breast or prostate cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1