Barriers and Facilitators to Staff Recruitment and Retention for ACT Teams: Perspectives of Staff and Participants.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1007/s11414-024-09898-z
Miriam C Tepper, Mariah Le Beau, Gary Clark, Helle Thorning, Leah G Pope
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators to Staff Recruitment and Retention for ACT Teams: Perspectives of Staff and Participants.","authors":"Miriam C Tepper, Mariah Le Beau, Gary Clark, Helle Thorning, Leah G Pope","doi":"10.1007/s11414-024-09898-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The behavioral health workforce has been experiencing deepening problems with recruitment and retention, particularly in publicly funded settings serving individuals with serious mental illnesses. This quality improvement project gathered Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) participant (service user) and provider perspectives on workforce challenges. The authors conducted 8 interviews with ACT participants and 9 focus groups with ACT current staff, team leaders, and former staff. Interviewees discussed barriers to recruitment and retention, including inadequate compensation, work becoming more task-oriented during periods of short staffing, a lack of understanding of what ACT work entails, and elements of the team-based model of care; and facilitators of recruitment and retention, including other aspects of the team-based model of care, connections with colleagues and ACT participants, and flexibility. ACT participants had variable experiences regarding availability of their teams. Recommendations from focus groups and interviews include increasing flexibility, improving awareness of ACT work, optimizing team functioning, addressing staff wellness, and attending to risk. Findings include key insights that may help address the critical workforce shortages in public behavioral health settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-024-09898-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The behavioral health workforce has been experiencing deepening problems with recruitment and retention, particularly in publicly funded settings serving individuals with serious mental illnesses. This quality improvement project gathered Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) participant (service user) and provider perspectives on workforce challenges. The authors conducted 8 interviews with ACT participants and 9 focus groups with ACT current staff, team leaders, and former staff. Interviewees discussed barriers to recruitment and retention, including inadequate compensation, work becoming more task-oriented during periods of short staffing, a lack of understanding of what ACT work entails, and elements of the team-based model of care; and facilitators of recruitment and retention, including other aspects of the team-based model of care, connections with colleagues and ACT participants, and flexibility. ACT participants had variable experiences regarding availability of their teams. Recommendations from focus groups and interviews include increasing flexibility, improving awareness of ACT work, optimizing team functioning, addressing staff wellness, and attending to risk. Findings include key insights that may help address the critical workforce shortages in public behavioral health settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ACT 小组招聘和留住工作人员的障碍和促进因素:工作人员和参与者的观点。
行为健康工作人员在招聘和留用方面遇到的问题越来越严重,尤其是在为患有严重精神疾病的个人提供服务的政府资助机构中。本质量改进项目收集了主动社区治疗(ACT)参与者(服务使用者)和提供者对劳动力挑战的看法。作者与 ACT 参与者进行了 8 次访谈,并与 ACT 现任员工、团队领导和前员工进行了 9 次焦点小组讨论。受访者讨论了招聘和留住人员的障碍,包括报酬不足、在人员短缺期间工作变得更加以任务为导向、对 ACT 工作的内涵和团队护理模式的要素缺乏了解;以及招聘和留住人员的促进因素,包括团队护理模式的其他方面、与同事和 ACT 参与者的联系以及灵活性。ACT 参与者在团队可用性方面的经历各不相同。焦点小组和访谈中提出的建议包括增加灵活性、提高对 ACT 工作的认识、优化团队运作、解决员工健康问题以及关注风险。研究结果包括有助于解决公共行为健康机构劳动力严重短缺问题的重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal examines the organization, financing, delivery and outcomes of behavioral health services (i.e., alcohol, drug abuse, and mental disorders), providing practical and empirical contributions to and explaining the implications for the broader behavioral health field. Each issue includes an overview of contemporary concerns and recent developments in behavioral health policy and management through research articles, policy perspectives, commentaries, brief reports, and book reviews. This journal is the official publication of the National Council for Behavioral Health.
期刊最新文献
Relational Complexity of the Near-Age Peer Support Provider Role in Youth and Young Adult Community Mental Health Settings. Clinical Variables Associated with Successful Treatment of Depression or Anxiety in Collaborative Care. A Qualitative Investigation of Characteristics Impacting Clinical Decision-Making in Integrated Behavioral Health Care. Descriptive Trends in Medicaid Antipsychotic Prescription Claims and Expenditures, 2016 - 2021. Looking Toward the Future of Integrated Care: History, Developments, and Opportunities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1