A Sociology of Plasma Proteins - A Technocrat's Perspective.

0 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International journal of social determinants of health and health services Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1177/27551938241264764
Albert Farrugia
{"title":"A Sociology of Plasma Proteins - A Technocrat's Perspective.","authors":"Albert Farrugia","doi":"10.1177/27551938241264764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This commentary addresses the article \"Toward a Sociology of Plasma Products\" by Holloway and Grundy in this issue of the <i>International Journal of Social Determinants of Health and Health Services</i>. The program of research proposed by the authors positioning the medico-industrial field of plasma products within a sociological context is supported, this being an endeavor which has not been attempted previously. I seek to augment Holloway and Grundy's proposed approach through some additional insights which are the result of over forty years of personal commitment in the field. Holloway and Grundy's proposed areas of engagement involving the products, the recipients, the donors and the governance of the systems binding these together is widened through an examination of additional technological factors that have shaped the field. These factors include the influence of the medical industry, the role of patient groups, the continuing controversy on the sourcing of plasma raw material, and the roles of different governance models. Converging these factors with Holloway and Grundy's proposed program should enhance its capacity to develop a framework for understanding the dynamics within this complex and unique sector. The concepts developed in both articles will assist stakeholders to develop a societal framework for the provision of these essential medicines.</p>","PeriodicalId":73479,"journal":{"name":"International journal of social determinants of health and health services","volume":" ","pages":"88-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of social determinants of health and health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27551938241264764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This commentary addresses the article "Toward a Sociology of Plasma Products" by Holloway and Grundy in this issue of the International Journal of Social Determinants of Health and Health Services. The program of research proposed by the authors positioning the medico-industrial field of plasma products within a sociological context is supported, this being an endeavor which has not been attempted previously. I seek to augment Holloway and Grundy's proposed approach through some additional insights which are the result of over forty years of personal commitment in the field. Holloway and Grundy's proposed areas of engagement involving the products, the recipients, the donors and the governance of the systems binding these together is widened through an examination of additional technological factors that have shaped the field. These factors include the influence of the medical industry, the role of patient groups, the continuing controversy on the sourcing of plasma raw material, and the roles of different governance models. Converging these factors with Holloway and Grundy's proposed program should enhance its capacity to develop a framework for understanding the dynamics within this complex and unique sector. The concepts developed in both articles will assist stakeholders to develop a societal framework for the provision of these essential medicines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血浆蛋白社会学--技术专家的视角。
本评论针对霍洛威和格兰迪在本期《国际健康与医疗服务社会决定因素杂志》上发表的文章《走向血浆产品社会学》进行了评论。作者提出的将血浆产品这一医疗工业领域置于社会学背景下进行研究的计划得到了支持,这是一项以前从未尝试过的工作。我试图通过一些额外的见解来充实霍洛韦和格兰迪提出的方法,这些见解是我个人四十多年来致力于该领域研究的成果。霍洛韦和格兰迪提出的涉及产品、接受者、捐赠者以及将这些因素结合在一起的系统管理的参与领域,通过对塑造这一领域的其他技术因素的研究而得到拓宽。这些因素包括医疗行业的影响、患者团体的作用、关于血浆原料来源的持续争议以及不同管理模式的作用。将这些因素与霍洛韦和格兰迪提出的计划结合起来,应能提高其制定框架的能力,从而了解这一复杂而独特领域的动态。这两篇文章中提出的概念将有助于利益相关者为提供这些基本药物制定一个社会框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social Mechanisms of Health Inequities, and the Political Economy of Health Care Services. Does Participating in New Rural Cooperative Medical Insurance Change Catastrophic Health Expenditure? Evidence from the China Household Income Project. The Locations of Palestine and the U.S. in the Global Map of Homelessness: Part 2. Demand and Supply Drivers of Medicare and Non-Medicare Health Spending: An Analysis of U.S. States, 1991-2019. Advancing Equity in Health Care Among Dalits and Tribal People in India: The Progress, Current Realities, and the Way Forward.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1