Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Intradermal Injection of Different Doses of Botulinum Toxin Type A: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Split-Face Pilot Study in Rosacea Patients with Erythematic Telangiectasia

IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Dermatologic Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1155/2024/5596030
Yuan Jiang, Fengyuan Wang, Wenqi Chen, Yihe Chen, Jie Dai
{"title":"Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Intradermal Injection of Different Doses of Botulinum Toxin Type A: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Split-Face Pilot Study in Rosacea Patients with Erythematic Telangiectasia","authors":"Yuan Jiang,&nbsp;Fengyuan Wang,&nbsp;Wenqi Chen,&nbsp;Yihe Chen,&nbsp;Jie Dai","doi":"10.1155/2024/5596030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Introduction</i>. Rosacea is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease of the central facial skin with unknown origin, significantly impacting quality of patient’s life and causing various psychosocial problems. Erythematotelangiectatic rosacea (ETR) is characterized by paroxysmal flushing that occurs repeatedly and is easily resistant to therapeutic drugs. While microinjection of type A botulinum toxin (BTX) can treat ETR, there is no consensus on the injection dose, and strong evidence to verify its efficacy and safety is lacking. This randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical study aimed to investigate the efficacy, safety, and optimal dose of two different single-point injection doses (0.5 U and 1 U) of BTX in the treatment of rosacea. <i>Methods</i>. Twenty-six patients with ETR were randomly assigned to receive different single-point injections of BTX (0.5 U and 1 U, respectively) every 1 cm on one half of the face. The Clinical Erythema Score (CEA), VISIA red area absolute value, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale Score (GAIS), and recurrence at 12-week follow-up were evaluated at baseline, 2,4, 8, and 12 weeks after injection. Additionally, the Dermatological Quality of Life Index (DLQI) questionnaire survey and adverse reactions were also recorded. <i>Results</i>. All twenty-six patients completed the follow-up visits and were included in the analysis. Compared to the 0.5 UBTX-treated side, the CEA score showed significantly improvement in erythema and flushing at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after injection on the 1 U BTX-treated side (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). The mean absolute value of the red area of VISIA was -19.12 ± 51.91 on 1 U BTX-treated side and 2.5 ± 42.08, on 0.5 UBTX-treated side at 4 weeks after treatment, showing significant improvement on the 1 U side (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). GAIS and DLQI were also significantly improved from Week 4 to Week 12 and Week 2 to Week 12, respectively (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). There was no recurrence of symptoms with either 0.5 U or 1 U injection by 12 weeks. Apart from one patient who experienced facial tightness and three patients who had temporary aggravation of erythema, all of which resolved without treatment, 22 patients did not report any side effects except for injection pain during the procedure. <i>Conclusions</i>. BTX-A can significantly improves symptoms and quality of life in patients with refractory rosacea with few side effects. A single-point injection of 1 U was more effective. This trial is registered with NCT06282679.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11045,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Therapy","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/5596030","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/5596030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Rosacea is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease of the central facial skin with unknown origin, significantly impacting quality of patient’s life and causing various psychosocial problems. Erythematotelangiectatic rosacea (ETR) is characterized by paroxysmal flushing that occurs repeatedly and is easily resistant to therapeutic drugs. While microinjection of type A botulinum toxin (BTX) can treat ETR, there is no consensus on the injection dose, and strong evidence to verify its efficacy and safety is lacking. This randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical study aimed to investigate the efficacy, safety, and optimal dose of two different single-point injection doses (0.5 U and 1 U) of BTX in the treatment of rosacea. Methods. Twenty-six patients with ETR were randomly assigned to receive different single-point injections of BTX (0.5 U and 1 U, respectively) every 1 cm on one half of the face. The Clinical Erythema Score (CEA), VISIA red area absolute value, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale Score (GAIS), and recurrence at 12-week follow-up were evaluated at baseline, 2,4, 8, and 12 weeks after injection. Additionally, the Dermatological Quality of Life Index (DLQI) questionnaire survey and adverse reactions were also recorded. Results. All twenty-six patients completed the follow-up visits and were included in the analysis. Compared to the 0.5 UBTX-treated side, the CEA score showed significantly improvement in erythema and flushing at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after injection on the 1 U BTX-treated side (P < 0.05). The mean absolute value of the red area of VISIA was -19.12 ± 51.91 on 1 U BTX-treated side and 2.5 ± 42.08, on 0.5 UBTX-treated side at 4 weeks after treatment, showing significant improvement on the 1 U side (P < 0.05). GAIS and DLQI were also significantly improved from Week 4 to Week 12 and Week 2 to Week 12, respectively (P < 0.05). There was no recurrence of symptoms with either 0.5 U or 1 U injection by 12 weeks. Apart from one patient who experienced facial tightness and three patients who had temporary aggravation of erythema, all of which resolved without treatment, 22 patients did not report any side effects except for injection pain during the procedure. Conclusions. BTX-A can significantly improves symptoms and quality of life in patients with refractory rosacea with few side effects. A single-point injection of 1 U was more effective. This trial is registered with NCT06282679.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估皮内注射不同剂量 A 型肉毒杆菌毒素的疗效和安全性:一项针对红斑性肢端肥大症红斑痤疮患者的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、分面试验研究
导言。红斑痤疮是一种常见的面部中央皮肤慢性炎症性皮肤病,病因不明,严重影响患者的生活质量,并造成各种社会心理问题。红斑性酒渣鼻(ETR)的特点是阵发性潮红,反复发作,且容易对治疗药物产生耐药性。虽然微量注射 A 型肉毒毒素(BTX)可以治疗 ETR,但对注射剂量尚未达成共识,也缺乏有力的证据来验证其有效性和安全性。这项随机、双盲、分面临床研究旨在探讨两种不同单点注射剂量(0.5 U 和 1 U)的 BTX 治疗酒渣鼻的疗效、安全性和最佳剂量。研究方法26 名红斑痤疮患者被随机分配到半边脸每隔 1 厘米注射不同剂量的 BTX(分别为 0.5 U 和 1 U)。分别在基线、注射后 2、4、8 和 12 周对临床红斑评分 (CEA)、VISIA 红色区域绝对值、全球美学改善量表评分 (GAIS) 和 12 周随访时的复发情况进行了评估。此外,还记录了皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)问卷调查和不良反应。结果所有 26 名患者均完成了随访并纳入分析。与注射 0.5 UBTX 的一侧相比,注射 1 UBTX 的一侧在注射后 2、4 和 8 周的 CEA 评分显示红斑和潮红明显改善(P < 0.05)。治疗 4 周后,1 U BTX 治疗侧 VISIA 红色区域的平均绝对值为 -19.12 ± 51.91,0.5 UBTX 治疗侧为 2.5 ± 42.08,显示 1 U 侧有显著改善(P < 0.05)。从第 4 周到第 12 周以及从第 2 周到第 12 周,GAIS 和 DLQI 也分别有明显改善(P < 0.05)。无论是注射 0.5 U 还是 1 U,12 周后症状均未复发。除了一名患者出现面部紧绷,三名患者出现暂时性红斑加重(均无需治疗即可缓解)外,22 名患者除在注射过程中出现注射疼痛外,未报告任何副作用。结论是BTX-A 能明显改善难治性酒渣鼻患者的症状和生活质量,且副作用小。单点注射 1 U 的效果更好。该试验已在 NCT06282679 上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatologic Therapy
Dermatologic Therapy 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Dermatologic Therapy has been created to fill an important void in the dermatologic literature: the lack of a readily available source of up-to-date information on the treatment of specific cutaneous diseases and the practical application of specific treatment modalities. Each issue of the journal consists of a series of scholarly review articles written by leaders in dermatology in which they describe, in very specific terms, how they treat particular cutaneous diseases and how they use specific therapeutic agents. The information contained in each issue is so practical and detailed that the reader should be able to directly apply various treatment approaches to daily clinical situations. Because of the specific and practical nature of this publication, Dermatologic Therapy not only serves as a readily available resource for the day-to-day treatment of patients, but also as an evolving therapeutic textbook for the treatment of dermatologic diseases.
期刊最新文献
Pharmaceutical Management of Rosacea—An Australian/New Zealand Medical Dermatology Consensus Narrative A3669G Polymorphism of Glucocorticoid Receptor Is More Present in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris Than in Healthy Controls and Contributes to Steroid-Resistance Baricitinib for the Treatment of Chronic Pruritus of Unknown Origin Patient Awareness, Education, and Support for Atopic Dermatitis in Egypt and Lebanon: Results of a Physician Survey and Social Analytics Evaluation of Quality of Life in First-Degree Relatives of Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Using Family Dermatology Life Quality Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1